Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 16, 2014; 2(10): 522-527
Published online Oct 16, 2014. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i10.522
Published online Oct 16, 2014. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i10.522
According to Stapfer et al[12] | According to Howard et al[13] | |
Type I | Lateral or medial wall perforation | Duodenal perforation remote from the papilla |
Type II | Perivaterian injury | Periampullary retroperitoneal perforation |
Type III | Distal bile duct injury related to wire/basket instrumentation | Guidewire perforation |
Type IV | Retroperitoneal air alone | None |
Factors | Results of multivariate analysis [OR (95%CI)] |
Dilated common bile duct | 2.32 (1.02-5.03) |
Sphincter of oddi dysfunction | 3.20 (1.64-8.94) |
Longer duration of procedure | 1.02 (1.00-1.04) |
Biliary stricture dilatation | 7.29 (1.84-28.11) |
Performance of sphincterotomy | 6.94 (2.43-19.77) |
- Citation: Prachayakul V, Aswakul P. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforation: Management and prevention. World J Clin Cases 2014; 2(10): 522-527
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v2/i10/522.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v2.i10.522