Zhou R, Xu CL. Application effect of case management nursing based on patient safety in patients with prostate cancer. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(27): 6070-6076 [PMID: 39328862 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i27.6070]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Chan-Ling Xu, MMed, Nurse, Department of Comprehensive Surgery II, Jiangnan University Affiliated Hospital, No. 200 Huihe Road, Wuxi 214101, Jiangsu Province, China. xc1992081@126.com
Research Domain of This Article
Urology & Nephrology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2024; 12(27): 6070-6076 Published online Sep 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i27.6070
Table 1 Baseline data
Group
Age range
Average age
BMI range
Observation group
52-81
66.27 ± 4.78
17-28
Control group
55-80
67.46 ± 5.26
18-27
Table 2 Comparison of self-depression scale for depression and self-assessment scale for anxiety scores between the two groups before and after intervention
Group
SDS
SAS
Before intervention
After intervention
Before intervention
After intervention
Control group
61.46 ± 4.62
52.60 ± 5.21
64.36 ± 6.24
50.27 ± 5.16
Observation group
62.02 ± 4.32
41.89 ± 5.63
63.68 ± 6.02
42.69 ± 4.98
t value
0.674
10.633
0.597
8.050
P value
0.502
0.000
0.552
0.000
Table 3 Comparison of prostate cancer symptom scores between the two groups after intervention
Group
Urinary system function
Intestinal function
Sexual function
Hormone function
Control group
75.36 ± 9.68
73.67 ± 10.36
57.43 ± 8.79
64.19 ± 7.26
Observation group
78.69 ± 10.12
75.16 ± 10.95
64.62 ± 8.09
75.19 ± 7.62
T value
1.811
0.753
4.584
7.960
P value
0.073
0.453
0.000
0.000
Table 4 Comparison of quality-of-life scores between the two groups after intervention
Group
Role function
Physical function
Emotional function
Social function
Control group
74.23 ± 5.60
59.98 ± 6.01
72.16 ± 5.49
52.18 ± 6.32
Observation group
85.16 ± 5.43
67.47 ± 6.25
85.19 ± 5.01
68.23 ± 7.19
t value
10.671
6.579
13.352
12.840
P value
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Citation: Zhou R, Xu CL. Application effect of case management nursing based on patient safety in patients with prostate cancer. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(27): 6070-6076