Application of sensory and motor training in AIDET communication mode in patients after knee arthroplasty

Table 1 Patients' general data, n (%)/mean ± SD

General data	Control group (n = 50)		Observation group (n = 50)	χ2/t	P value
Sex	Male	26 (52.00)	23 (46.00)	χ2 = 0.360	0.549
	Female	24 (48.00)	27 (54.00)
Age (years)	63.86 ± 6.15		64.18 ± 6.25	t = 0.258	0.797
Affected limb	Left	24 (48.00)	27 (54.00)	χ2 = 0.360	0.549
	Right	26 (52.00)	23 (46.00)
BMI (kg/m2)	22.96 ± 2.84		23.04 ± 3.01	t = 0.137	0.892
Basic diseases	Hypertension	18 (36.00)	20 (40.00)	χ2 = 0.428	0.807
	Hyperlipidemia	15 (30.00)	16 (32.00)
	No	17 (34.00)	14 (28.00)
History of smoking	Yes	12 (24.00)	15 (30.00)	χ2 = 0.457	0.499
	No	38 (76.00)	35 (70.00)

BMI: Body mass index.

Table 2 Comparison of the New York hospital for special surgery scores of knee function, mean ± SD

Group	Admission	Discharge	Eight weeks after intervention	F	P value
Observation group (n = 50)	54.73 ± 6.83	65.23 ± 6.84a	84.53 ± 5.27a,b	282.734	< 0.001
Control group (n = 50)	56.04 ± 7.15	61.03 ± 7.15a	74.92 ± 6.52a,b	99.182	< 0.001
t value	0.937	3.001	8.106
P value	0.351	0.003	< 0.001

^aP < 0.05 vs the functional score at the time of admission.

^bP < 0.05 vs the functional score at discharge.

Table 3 Comparison of the Berg Balance Scale scores of balance function, mean ± SD

Group	Admission	Discharge	Eight weeks after intervention	F	P value
Observation group (n = 50)	33.82 ± 5.48	40.58 ± 5.80a	48.52 ± 5.43a,b	87.175	< 0.001
Control group (n = 50)	34.40 ± 5.51	37.80 ± 5.67a	42.73 ± 5.51a,b	28.334	< 0.001
t value	0.528	2.424	5.292
P value	0.599	0.017	< 0.001

^aP < 0.05 vs the Berg Balance Scale score at the time of admission.

^bP < 0.05 vs the Berg Balance Scale score at discharge.

Table 4 Comparison of time of functional walking ability tests, mean ± SD

Group	Admission	Discharge	8 weeks after intervention	F	P value
Observation group (n = 50)	61.28 ± 6.23	28.84 ± 4.29a	16.82 ± 3.41a,b	1152.415	< 0.001
Control group (n = 50)	59.96 ± 6.82	36.84 ± 5.20a	25.10 ± 4.73a,b	491.940	< 0.001
t value	1.010	8.391	10.041
P value	0.315	< 0.001	< 0.001

^aP < 0.05 vs test time at admission.

^bP < 0.05 vs test time at discharge.

Table 5 Comparison of proprioception test, mean ± SD

Group	Admission	Discharge	8 weeks after intervention	F	P value
Observation group (n = 50)	18.10 ± 3.28	14.82 ± 2.75a	10.12 ± 1.54a,b	116.623	< 0.001
Control group (n = 50)	17.98 ± 3.35	16.37 ± 2.95a	13.68 ± 1.82a,b	30.466	< 0.001
t value	0.181	2.718	10.559
P value	0.857	0.008	< 0.001

^aP < 0.05 vs the proprioception test at the time of admission.

^bP < 0.05 vs the proprioception test at discharge.

Table 6 Comparison of resilience, mean ± SD

Group	Tough and tensile		Optimistic		Sense of power
	Pre-intervention	Post-intervention	Pre-intervention	Post-intervention	Pre-intervention	Post-intervention
Observation group (n = 50)	26.86 ± 5.18	43.28 ± 5.82a	8.92 ± 3.15	13.15 ± 2.20a	16.38 ± 4.82	25.83 ± 4.02a
Control group (n = 50)	27.25 ± 5.21	37.18 ± 5.52a	9.18 ± 3.24	11.63 ± 2.08a	17.04 ± 4.96	21.36 ± 4.18a
t value	0.375	5.377	0.407	3.550	0.675	5.450
P value	0.708	< 0.001	0.685	0.001	0.501	< 0.001

^aP < 0.05 vs pre-intervention.