Randomized Controlled Trial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2024; 12(24): 5542-5548
Published online Aug 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i24.5542
Table 1 Proportion of clinical efficacy
Group
n
Significant effect
Effective
Invalid
Total effective
A4935 (71.43)13 (26.53)1 (2.04)48 (97.96)
B4927 (55.10)15 (30.61)7 (14.29)42 (85.71)
χ24.900
P value0.027
Table 2 Comparison of alveolar bone mineral density
GroupnAlveolar crest parietal bone mineral density in g/cm2
t value
P value
Apical bone mineral density in g/cm2
t value
P value
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
A49350.28 ± 25.37327.36 ± 26.604.365< 0.001332.23 ± 11.58308.09 ± 12.629.866< 0.001
B49350.54 ± 23.63339.17 ± 25.162.3060.023331.28 ± 14.73300.04 ± 15.7510.141< 0.001
t value0.0532.2580.3552.792
P value0.9580.0260.7230.006
Table 3 Comparison of masticatory function and language function
Group
n
Time
Masticatory function
Language function
A49Before treatment4.68 ± 1.244.82 ± 0.98
After treatment9.39 ± 0.39a,b9.25 ± 0.22a,b
B49Before treatment4.75 ± 1.364.85 ± 1.03
After treatment7.13 ± 0.40a7.05 ± 0.47a
Table 4 The proportion of patient satisfaction
Group
n
Very satisfied
Satisfied
Not satisfied
Satisfaction
A4939 (79.59)9 (18.37)1 (2.04)48 (97.96)
B4923 (46.94)16 (32.65)10 (20.41)39 (79.59)
t value8.295
P value0.004
Table 5 Proportion of oral adverse reactions
Group
n
Gingivitis
Periodontal discomfort
Implant loosening
Root resorption
Total
Total490 (0.00)0 (0.00)1 (2.04)0 (0.00)1 (2.04)
B491 (2.04)1 (2.04)7 (14.29)3 (6.13)12 (24.49)
χ210.731
P value0.001