Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2024; 12(24): 5542-5548
Published online Aug 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i24.5542
Published online Aug 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i24.5542
Table 1 Proportion of clinical efficacy
Group | n | Significant effect | Effective | Invalid | Total effective |
A | 49 | 35 (71.43) | 13 (26.53) | 1 (2.04) | 48 (97.96) |
B | 49 | 27 (55.10) | 15 (30.61) | 7 (14.29) | 42 (85.71) |
χ2 | 4.900 | ||||
P value | 0.027 |
Table 2 Comparison of alveolar bone mineral density
Group | n | Alveolar crest parietal bone mineral density in | t value | P value | Apical bone mineral density in | t value | P value | ||
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||||||
A | 49 | 350.28 ± 25.37 | 327.36 ± 26.60 | 4.365 | < 0.001 | 332.23 ± 11.58 | 308.09 ± 12.62 | 9.866 | < 0.001 |
B | 49 | 350.54 ± 23.63 | 339.17 ± 25.16 | 2.306 | 0.023 | 331.28 ± 14.73 | 300.04 ± 15.75 | 10.141 | < 0.001 |
t value | 0.053 | 2.258 | 0.355 | 2.792 | |||||
P value | 0.958 | 0.026 | 0.723 | 0.006 |
Table 3 Comparison of masticatory function and language function
Table 4 The proportion of patient satisfaction
Group | n | Very satisfied | Satisfied | Not satisfied | Satisfaction |
A | 49 | 39 (79.59) | 9 (18.37) | 1 (2.04) | 48 (97.96) |
B | 49 | 23 (46.94) | 16 (32.65) | 10 (20.41) | 39 (79.59) |
t value | 8.295 | ||||
P value | 0.004 |
Table 5 Proportion of oral adverse reactions
Group | n | Gingivitis | Periodontal discomfort | Implant loosening | Root resorption | Total |
Total | 49 | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.04) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.04) |
B | 49 | 1 (2.04) | 1 (2.04) | 7 (14.29) | 3 (6.13) | 12 (24.49) |
χ2 | 10.731 | |||||
P value | 0.001 |
- Citation: Yang Y, Zhou SC, Ma YH, Wang X, Dong QS. Clinical efficacy, bone density, and follow-up in implant and orthodontic treatment for inclined adjacent teeth. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(24): 5542-5548
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i24/5542.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i24.5542