Clinical Trials Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2024; 12(24): 5534-5541
Published online Aug 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i24.5534
Table 1 Basic clinical data of children in the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group

Control group
Observation group
t/χ2
P value
Case (n)4242
AgeMaximum10110.0790.694
Minimum66
Average8.79 ± 1.088.87 ± 1.170.3540.443
Height (cm)Maximum1411443.9770.051
Minimum113111
Average126.59 ± 2.52125.34 ± 2.401.6790.098
Body quality (kg/m2)Highest20.6921.380.7600.308
Lowest15.3515.30
Table 2 Comparison of clinical efficacy between the two groups
Group
Control group
Observation group
t/χ2
P value
Case (n)4242
Healing05
Significant1725
Effective159
Invalid103
Total effective rate, n (%)32 (76.19)39 (92.86)17.1630.001
Table 3 Comparison of growth indicators between the two groups of children (mean ± SD)
Group
Control group
Observation group
t
P value
Growth rate (%)
Before intervention4.56 ± 0.614.81 ± 0.751.7150.090
After intervention3.56 ± 0.592.25 ± 0.898.1900.001
Height (cm)
Before intervention125.26 ± 3.00125.11 ± 2.950.2220.829
After intervention133.44 ± 2.33127.81 ± 2.4310.9340.001
Bone age (year)
Before intervention8.80 ± 0.508.91 ± 0.640.9410.348
After intervention9.24 ± 0.647.21 ± 0.3318.8360.001
Table 4 Comparison of ovarian function indicators between the two groups of children (mean ± SD)
Group
Control group
Observation group
t
P value
P (ng/mL)
Before intervention4.76 ± 1.604.83 ± 1.690.1410.891
After intervention2.94 ± 0.732.14 ± 0.645.4660.001
T (nmol/L)
Before intervention6.78 ± 2.166.73 ± 2.220.1480.881
After intervention4.46 ± 1.443.11 ± 1.124.7570.001
E2 (pg/mL)
Before intervention30.34 ± 5.7230.85 ± 5.690.3870.706
After intervention18.76 ± 2.9211.44 ± 2.7511.8140.001
PRL (ng/mL)
Before intervention12.76 ± 3.5113.05 ± 3.640.3700.712
After intervention11.00 ± 2.548.93 ± 2.793.5910.001
LH (U/L)
Before intervention3.16 ± 0.083.19 ± 0.080.5690.572
After intervention2.14 ± 0.361.51 ± 0.279.3140.001
FSH (IU/L)
Before intervention15.22 ± 5.2615.36 ± 5.150.1230.913
After intervention8.76 ± 2.576.27 ± 2.354.6150.001
Table 5 Comparison of adverse reactions between the two groups of children, n (%)
Group
Control group
Observation group
Z
P value
Case4242
Sweat1 (2.38)0 (0)
Back pain1 (2.38)0 (0)
Dizziness00
Dry mouth1 (2.38)1 (2.38)
Adverse reaction rate3 (7.14)1 (2.38)0.2160.641