Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 6, 2024; 12(22): 4905-4912
Published online Aug 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i22.4905
Table 1 Basic information of patients
GroupAge in yrBMISex
Males
Female
Result42.1 (9.1)25 (4.4)42/50 (84)8/50 (16)
Table 2 Comparison of anorectal manometry before and after treatment
Pressure
Before
After
P value
Resting 92.27 ± 20.3874.89 ± 14.68< 0.05
Squeeze 159.93 ± 40.23113.37 ± 16.97< 0.05
Table 3 Comparison of anal sphincter pressure changes according to biofeedback therapy response
Pressure typeBeforeAfterP value
Resting stage6.14 ± 3.343.97 ± 1.87< 0.05
Type I muscle tonic contraction variability34.37 ± 17.9432.71 ± 12.23> 0.05
Type II muscle tonic contraction variability19.84 ± 9.7622.76 ± 5.81> 0.05
Post-resting stage6.01 ± 3.243.71 ± 1.31< 0.05
Table 4 Comparison of constipation scores before and after treatment
Parameter
Before
After
P value
Straining2.76 ± 1.170.14 ± 0.50< 0.01
Defecation blockage2.86 ± 1.530.20 ± 0.57< 0.01
Manual defecation0.82 ± 0.800.10 ± 0.30< 0.01