Su JQ, Liang F. Comparing pharmacotherapy and transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of anxiety and depression after aortic dissection surgery. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(21): 4476-4482 [PMID: 39070826 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i21.4476]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Feng Liang, MBChB, Associate Chief Physician, Department of Vascular Surgery, Qinghai Province Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease Specialist Hospital, No. 7 Zhuanchang Road, Nanchuan West Road, Xining 810012, Qinghai Province, China. feng_liang0163@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
Article-Type of This Article
Case Control Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2024; 12(21): 4476-4482 Published online Jul 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i21.4476
Table 1 Analysis of anxiety and depression in both groups (mean ± SD, points)
Group
n
HAMA
HAMD
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Control group
75
26.95 ± 3.14
16.99 ± 3.07
27.08 ± 7.03
19.53 ± 4.95
Study group
76
26.63 ± 3.86
14.53 ± 2.11
28.13 ± 7.01
17.21 ± 5.34
t value
0.549
5.744
0.919
2.770
P value
0.584
< 0.001
0.360
0.006
Table 2 Curative effect analysis in both groups
Groups
n
Effectual
Improved
Ineffective
Effective rate (%)
Control group
75
43
17
15
80.00
Study group
76
52
20
4
94.74
χ2
7.453
P value
0.006
Table 3 Serum index analysis for both groups (mean ± SD, ng/mL)
Group
n
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor
5-HT
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Control group
75
23.46 ± 4.26
29.17 ± 3.29
44.16 ± 6.40
68.21 ± 10.57
Study group
76
23.43 ± 4.17
31.27 ± 3.41
44.08 ± 6.48
78.56 ± 11.28
t value
0.044
3.850
0.076
5.816
P value
0.965
< 0.001
0.939
< 0.001
Table 4 Sleep quality analysis in both groups (mean ± SD, point)
Group
n
Before treatment
After treatment
Control group
75
13.28 ± 1.74
9.39 ± 1.27
Study group
76
13.26 ± 1.67
7.20 ± 1.03
t value
0.061
11.615
P value
0.952
< 0.001
Table 5 Cognitive function analysis for both groups (mean ± SD, point)
Group
n
Attention
Immediate memory
Delayed memory
Visuospatial
Language
Aggregate score
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Control group
75
93.36 ± 2.64
94.75 ± 1.73
81.35 ± 6.63
90.75 ± 2.36
88.61 ± 5.73
95.12 ± 2.13
90.15 ± 1.34
92.53 ± 1.35
87.63 ± 3.63
93.41 ± 2.15
441.09 ± 10.09
466.56 ± 4.71
Study group
76
93.42 ± 2.71
97.28 ± 0.69
81.28 ± 6.57
96.58 ± 1.47
88.57 ± 5.62
99.25 ± 0.66
90.18 ± 1.26
95.49 ± 1.61
87.61 ± 3.53
96.07 ± 2.04
441.05 ± 8.88
484.66 ± 3.01
t value
0.14
11.825
0.066
18.245
0.051
16.142
0.177
12.2
0.037
7.774
0.026
28.194
P value
0.889
< 0.001
0.948
< 0.001
0.959
< 0.001
0.86
< 0.001
0.971
< 0.001
0.979
< 0.001
Citation: Su JQ, Liang F. Comparing pharmacotherapy and transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of anxiety and depression after aortic dissection surgery. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(21): 4476-4482