Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2024; 12(21): 4476-4482
Published online Jul 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i21.4476
Published online Jul 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i21.4476
Table 1 Analysis of anxiety and depression in both groups (mean ± SD, points)
Group | n | HAMA | HAMD | ||
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||
Control group | 75 | 26.95 ± 3.14 | 16.99 ± 3.07 | 27.08 ± 7.03 | 19.53 ± 4.95 |
Study group | 76 | 26.63 ± 3.86 | 14.53 ± 2.11 | 28.13 ± 7.01 | 17.21 ± 5.34 |
t value | 0.549 | 5.744 | 0.919 | 2.770 | |
P value | 0.584 | < 0.001 | 0.360 | 0.006 |
Table 2 Curative effect analysis in both groups
Groups | n | Effectual | Improved | Ineffective | Effective rate (%) |
Control group | 75 | 43 | 17 | 15 | 80.00 |
Study group | 76 | 52 | 20 | 4 | 94.74 |
χ2 | 7.453 | ||||
P value | 0.006 |
Table 3 Serum index analysis for both groups (mean ± SD, ng/mL)
Group | n | Brain-derived neurotrophic factor | 5-HT | ||
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||
Control group | 75 | 23.46 ± 4.26 | 29.17 ± 3.29 | 44.16 ± 6.40 | 68.21 ± 10.57 |
Study group | 76 | 23.43 ± 4.17 | 31.27 ± 3.41 | 44.08 ± 6.48 | 78.56 ± 11.28 |
t value | 0.044 | 3.850 | 0.076 | 5.816 | |
P value | 0.965 | < 0.001 | 0.939 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Sleep quality analysis in both groups (mean ± SD, point)
Group | n | Before treatment | After treatment |
Control group | 75 | 13.28 ± 1.74 | 9.39 ± 1.27 |
Study group | 76 | 13.26 ± 1.67 | 7.20 ± 1.03 |
t value | 0.061 | 11.615 | |
P value | 0.952 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Cognitive function analysis for both groups (mean ± SD, point)
Group | n | Attention | Immediate memory | Delayed memory | Visuospatial | Language | Aggregate score | ||||||
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||
Control group | 75 | 93.36 ± 2.64 | 94.75 ± 1.73 | 81.35 ± 6.63 | 90.75 ± 2.36 | 88.61 ± 5.73 | 95.12 ± 2.13 | 90.15 ± 1.34 | 92.53 ± 1.35 | 87.63 ± 3.63 | 93.41 ± 2.15 | 441.09 ± 10.09 | 466.56 ± 4.71 |
Study group | 76 | 93.42 ± 2.71 | 97.28 ± 0.69 | 81.28 ± 6.57 | 96.58 ± 1.47 | 88.57 ± 5.62 | 99.25 ± 0.66 | 90.18 ± 1.26 | 95.49 ± 1.61 | 87.61 ± 3.53 | 96.07 ± 2.04 | 441.05 ± 8.88 | 484.66 ± 3.01 |
t value | 0.14 | 11.825 | 0.066 | 18.245 | 0.051 | 16.142 | 0.177 | 12.2 | 0.037 | 7.774 | 0.026 | 28.194 | |
P value | 0.889 | < 0.001 | 0.948 | < 0.001 | 0.959 | < 0.001 | 0.86 | < 0.001 | 0.971 | < 0.001 | 0.979 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Su JQ, Liang F. Comparing pharmacotherapy and transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of anxiety and depression after aortic dissection surgery. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(21): 4476-4482
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i21/4476.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i21.4476