Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 16, 2024; 12(20): 4180-4190
Published online Jul 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4180
Published online Jul 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4180
Table 1 Patient characteristics
Patient | Sex | Age at presentation (years) | Duration of rhinophyma (years) |
1 | M | 53 | 12 |
2 | F | 47 | 8 |
3 | M | 50 | 10 |
4 | M | 54 | 8 |
5 | M | 46 | 6 |
6 | M | 56 | 14 |
7 | M | 58 | 15 |
8 | M | 65 | 20 |
9 | M | 55 | 15 |
10 | M | 60 | 20 |
11 | M | 53 | 16 |
12 | M | 62 | 18 |
13 | M | 65 | 15 |
14 | M | 48 | 8 |
15 | M | 39 | 5 |
16 | F | 52 | 10 |
17 | M | 49 | 8 |
18 | M | 45 | 6 |
19 | M | 50 | 8 |
20 | M | 43 | 6 |
21 | M | 38 | 6 |
22 | M | 47 | 8 |
23 | M | 50 | 10 |
24 | M | 33 | 10 |
25 | M | 63 | 15 |
26 | M | 60 | 20 |
27 | M | 57 | 13 |
28 | M | 58 | 15 |
Table 2 Rhinophyma Severity Index pre- and postoperatively
Patient | RHISI (before treatment) | RHISI (6 months after treatment) | RHISI (5 years after treatment) | RHISI improvement (6 months, %) | RHISI improvement (5 years, %) |
1 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 100 | 83.33 |
2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 100 | 75 |
5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
8 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 83.33 | 66.67 |
9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
10 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 100 | 66.67 |
11 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
12 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 83.33 | 66.67 |
13 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
14 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 100 | 75 |
15 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
16 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
17 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
18 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
19 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 100 | 66.67 |
21 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
22 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
23 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
24 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 100 | 83.33 |
25 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
26 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 100 | 83.33 |
27 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 83.33 | 66.67 |
28 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
Table 3 Results of patient satisfaction survey
Question | 6 months after treatment (%) | 5 years after treatment (%) |
Satisfaction | ||
0–3 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
4–6 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
7–9 | 3 (0.11) | 2 (0.07) |
10 | 25 (0.89) | 26 (0.93) |
Effects maintained | ||
Yes | 26 (0.93) | 24 (0.86) |
Not sure | 2 (0.07) | 4 (0.14) |
No | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Self-impression | ||
Excellent | 25 (0.89) | 25 (0.89) |
Good | 2 (0.07) | 2 (0.07) |
Sufficient | 1 (0.04) | 1 (0.04) |
Disappointing | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Back to social life | ||
Too long | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Long | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Sufficient | 4 (0.14) | 4 (0.14) |
Quick | 19 (0.68) | 19 (0.68) |
Very quick | 5 (0.18) | 5 (0.18) |
Recommend | ||
Yes | 28 (1) | 28 (1) |
Not sure | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
No | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Table 4 Clinical manifestations of recurrent rhinophyma 5 years postoperatively
Type | Percentage (%) |
Recurrence of rhinophyma | 5/28 (18) |
Improved postoperatively | 5/5 (100) |
Same before/postoperatively | 0/5 (0) |
Worse postoperatively | 0/5 (0) |
- Citation: Zheng YP, He XF, Zhang YF, Geng LX, Zhang HM, Wan H, He X. Five-blade scratcher for treating severe rhinophyma: A retrospective study. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(20): 4180-4190
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i20/4180.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4180