Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 16, 2024; 12(20): 4154-4165
Published online Jul 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4154
Table 1 Ultrasonography B-line and dual-lung 6-zone pulmonary consolidation score in children with respiratory distress syndrome
Classification
Ultrasonography changes
Ultrasonography scores
B-lineThere are A-lines and the number of B-lines is < 30
B-lines appear between two consecutive ribs or more, i.e. B-lines ≥ 31
Dense and integrated B-line (without A-line)2
Pulmonary consolidationNo pulmonary consolidation0
Involved intercostal space, lung consolidation range ≤ 1/2 of the lung field3
The range of the lung consolidation involving the intercostal space is greater than half of the lung field4
Table 2 X-ray grading and imaging manifestations
X-ray grading
X-ray imaging manifestations
0No image changes
IThe transparency of both lung fields is generally reduced, with evenly scattered small particles and reticular shadows visible
IIExcept for the aggravation of grade I changes, bronchial inflation sign can be seen, extending to the middle and outer zones of the lung field
IIIThe lesion worsens, the transparency of the lung field decreases further, and the cardiac and diaphragmatic margins appear blurry
IVThe entire lung field appears as a white lung, with more pronounced bronchial inflation signs resembling bald branches
Table 3 Comparison of respiratory distress syndrome neonatal ultrasonography score, respiratory distress score, oxygenation index, and chest X-ray grade before treatment
Items

n
Ultrasonography score,
points
Respiratory distress score, points
Oxygenation index
Chest X-ray grade
0
I
II
III
IV
SexMale5026.68 ± 7.417.60 ± 1.327.99 ± 2.6401131719
Female2326.87 ± 7.357.83 ± 0.987.76 ± 1.59017510
t/Z−0.102−0.7300.388−0.057
P value0.9190.4680.6990.955
Pregnancy duration in wk< 322925.66 ± 7.837.69 ± 1.267.59 ± 2.760271010
32–363526.77 ± 6.957.57 ± 1.298.01 ± 2.1700111113
> 36930.11 ± 6.868.00 ± 0.878.66 ± 1.4000216
F/H1.2770.4360.7442.073
P value0.2850.6480.4790.355
Weight in g< 15002126.29 ± 8.287.76 ± 1.227.87 ± 3.0601659
1500–25003826.29 ± 6.857.53 ± 1.227.56 ± 2.0301101413
> 25001428.64 ± 7.397.93 ± 1.278.97 ± 1.7000437
F/H0.5760.6251.9010.494
P value0.5650.5380.1570.781
First ultrasonography time in h< 11529.20 ± 6.138.07 ± 0.809.02 ± 2.65002310
1–1.53925.23 ± 7.687.59 ± 1.337.68 ± 2.3002121312
> 1.51927.89 ± 7.097.53 ± 1.267.55 ± 2.0600667
F/H1.9541.0002.1355.689
P value0.1490.3730.1260.058
Table 4 Comparison of the respiratory distress syndrome neonatal ultrasonography score, respiratory distress score, oxygenation index, and chest X-ray grade before and after treatment
Items
Before treatment, n = 73
After treatment, n = 73
t/Z
P value
Ultrasonography score (points)26.74 ± 7.3415.12 ± 6.1117.324< 0.001
Respiratory distress score (points)7.67 ± 1.233.93 ± 1.2547.887< 0.001
Oxygenation index7.92 ± 2.355.84 ± 2.139.543< 0.001
Chest X-ray grade00 (0.00)32 (43.84)−7.460< 0.001
I2 (2.74)24 (32.88)
II20 (27.40)16 (21.92)
III22 (30.14)1 (1.37)
IV29 (39.73)0 (0.00)
Table 5 Correlation between the respiratory distress syndrome neonatal ultrasonography score and respiratory distress score, oxygenation index, and chest X-ray grade before and after treatment (n = 73)
Comparator
Ultrasonography score
Before treatment
After treatment
ρ
P value
ρ
P value
Respiratory distress score0.446< 0.0010.429< 0.001
Oxygenation index0.703< 0.0010.748< 0.001
Chest X-ray grade0.859< 0.0010.764< 0.001
Table 6 Respiratory distress syndrome parameters
Categorical variable
AUC
SE
P value
Youden index
Optimal cutoff value
Sensitivity, %
Specificity, %
I–II1.0000.000< 0.0011.000> 12100.00100.00
II–III0.8050.077< 0.0010.682> 2468.18100.00
III–IV0.9460.030< 0.0010.795> 3093.1086.36