Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 16, 2024; 12(20): 4154-4165
Published online Jul 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4154
Published online Jul 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4154
Table 1 Ultrasonography B-line and dual-lung 6-zone pulmonary consolidation score in children with respiratory distress syndrome
Classification | Ultrasonography changes | Ultrasonography scores |
B-line | There are A-lines and the number of B-lines is < 3 | 0 |
B-lines appear between two consecutive ribs or more, i.e. B-lines ≥ 3 | 1 | |
Dense and integrated B-line (without A-line) | 2 | |
Pulmonary consolidation | No pulmonary consolidation | 0 |
Involved intercostal space, lung consolidation range ≤ 1/2 of the lung field | 3 | |
The range of the lung consolidation involving the intercostal space is greater than half of the lung field | 4 |
Table 2 X-ray grading and imaging manifestations
X-ray grading | X-ray imaging manifestations |
0 | No image changes |
I | The transparency of both lung fields is generally reduced, with evenly scattered small particles and reticular shadows visible |
II | Except for the aggravation of grade I changes, bronchial inflation sign can be seen, extending to the middle and outer zones of the lung field |
III | The lesion worsens, the transparency of the lung field decreases further, and the cardiac and diaphragmatic margins appear blurry |
IV | The entire lung field appears as a white lung, with more pronounced bronchial inflation signs resembling bald branches |
Table 3 Comparison of respiratory distress syndrome neonatal ultrasonography score, respiratory distress score, oxygenation index, and chest X-ray grade before treatment
Items | n | Ultrasonography score, points | Respiratory distress score, points | Oxygenation index | Chest X-ray grade | |||||
0 | I | II | III | IV | ||||||
Sex | Male | 50 | 26.68 ± 7.41 | 7.60 ± 1.32 | 7.99 ± 2.64 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 17 | 19 |
Female | 23 | 26.87 ± 7.35 | 7.83 ± 0.98 | 7.76 ± 1.59 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 10 | |
t/Z | −0.102 | −0.730 | 0.388 | −0.057 | ||||||
P value | 0.919 | 0.468 | 0.699 | 0.955 | ||||||
Pregnancy duration in wk | < 32 | 29 | 25.66 ± 7.83 | 7.69 ± 1.26 | 7.59 ± 2.76 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 | 10 |
32–36 | 35 | 26.77 ± 6.95 | 7.57 ± 1.29 | 8.01 ± 2.17 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 | 13 | |
> 36 | 9 | 30.11 ± 6.86 | 8.00 ± 0.87 | 8.66 ± 1.40 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |
F/H | 1.277 | 0.436 | 0.744 | 2.073 | ||||||
P value | 0.285 | 0.648 | 0.479 | 0.355 | ||||||
Weight in g | < 1500 | 21 | 26.29 ± 8.28 | 7.76 ± 1.22 | 7.87 ± 3.06 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 9 |
1500–2500 | 38 | 26.29 ± 6.85 | 7.53 ± 1.22 | 7.56 ± 2.03 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 14 | 13 | |
> 2500 | 14 | 28.64 ± 7.39 | 7.93 ± 1.27 | 8.97 ± 1.70 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
F/H | 0.576 | 0.625 | 1.901 | 0.494 | ||||||
P value | 0.565 | 0.538 | 0.157 | 0.781 | ||||||
First ultrasonography time in h | < 1 | 15 | 29.20 ± 6.13 | 8.07 ± 0.80 | 9.02 ± 2.65 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
1–1.5 | 39 | 25.23 ± 7.68 | 7.59 ± 1.33 | 7.68 ± 2.30 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 13 | 12 | |
> 1.5 | 19 | 27.89 ± 7.09 | 7.53 ± 1.26 | 7.55 ± 2.06 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 7 | |
F/H | 1.954 | 1.000 | 2.135 | 5.689 | ||||||
P value | 0.149 | 0.373 | 0.126 | 0.058 |
Table 4 Comparison of the respiratory distress syndrome neonatal ultrasonography score, respiratory distress score, oxygenation index, and chest X-ray grade before and after treatment
Items | Before treatment, n = 73 | After treatment, n = 73 | t/Z | P value | |
Ultrasonography score (points) | 26.74 ± 7.34 | 15.12 ± 6.11 | 17.324 | < 0.001 | |
Respiratory distress score (points) | 7.67 ± 1.23 | 3.93 ± 1.25 | 47.887 | < 0.001 | |
Oxygenation index | 7.92 ± 2.35 | 5.84 ± 2.13 | 9.543 | < 0.001 | |
Chest X-ray grade | 0 | 0 (0.00) | 32 (43.84) | −7.460 | < 0.001 |
I | 2 (2.74) | 24 (32.88) | |||
II | 20 (27.40) | 16 (21.92) | |||
III | 22 (30.14) | 1 (1.37) | |||
IV | 29 (39.73) | 0 (0.00) |
Table 5 Correlation between the respiratory distress syndrome neonatal ultrasonography score and respiratory distress score, oxygenation index, and chest X-ray grade before and after treatment (n = 73)
Comparator | Ultrasonography score | |||
Before treatment | After treatment | |||
ρ | P value | ρ | P value | |
Respiratory distress score | 0.446 | < 0.001 | 0.429 | < 0.001 |
Oxygenation index | 0.703 | < 0.001 | 0.748 | < 0.001 |
Chest X-ray grade | 0.859 | < 0.001 | 0.764 | < 0.001 |
Table 6 Respiratory distress syndrome parameters
Categorical variable | AUC | SE | P value | Youden index | Optimal cutoff value | Sensitivity, % | Specificity, % |
I–II | 1.000 | 0.000 | < 0.001 | 1.000 | > 12 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
II–III | 0.805 | 0.077 | < 0.001 | 0.682 | > 24 | 68.18 | 100.00 |
III–IV | 0.946 | 0.030 | < 0.001 | 0.795 | > 30 | 93.10 | 86.36 |
- Citation: Yang H, Gao LJ, Lei J, Li Q, Cui L, Li XH, Yin WX, Tian SH. Relationship between neonatal respiratory distress syndrome pulmonary ultrasonography and respiratory distress score, oxygenation index, and chest radiography grading. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(20): 4154-4165
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i20/4154.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4154