Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 16, 2024; 12(20): 4130-4136
Published online Jul 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4130
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups
GroupnGender, n (%)
Age (mean ± SD)Infusion time [(mean ± SD), d], χ2Admission diagnosis disease type, n (%)
Male /Female
Respiratory diseases
Digestive system diseases
Nervous system disease
Urinary system disease
Control group6535 (53.85)/30 (46.15)6.89 ± 2.125.85 ± 1.4734 (52.31)23 (35.38)5 (7.69)3 (4.62)
Observation group6533 (50.77)/32 (49.23)6.82 ± 2.245.92 ± 1.4332 (49.23)24 (36.92)7 (10.77)2 (3.08)
χ2/t0.1230.1600.2410.615
P value0.7250.8730.8100.893
Table 2 Comparison of adverse infusion events between the two groups
GroupnFluid extravasation
Dosing error
Repeated puncture
Needle falls off
Number of cases (n)
Incidence (%)
Number of cases (n)
Incidence (%)
Number of cases (n)
Incidence (%)
Number of cases (n)
    Incidence (%)
Control group65812.3123.0869.23913.85
Observation group6523.0800.0023.0811.54
χ23.9002.0312.1310.693
P value0.0480.1540.1440.008
Table 3 Comparison of family satisfaction between the two groups, n (%)
Group
n
Very satisfied
Generally
Dissatisfied
Satisfaction
Control group6530 (46.15)26 (40.00)9 (13.85)56 (86.15)
Observation group6546 (70.77)17 (26.15)2 (3.08)63 (96.92)
χ24.866
P value0.027
Table 4 Comparison of compliance between the two groups of children, n (%)
Group
n
Active compliance
Basic compliance
N on-compliance
Compliance rate
Control group6537 (56.92)20 (30.77)8 (12.31)57 (87.69)
Observation group6548 (73.85)16 (24.62)1 (1.54)64 (98.46)
χ25.849
P value0.016
Table 5 Comparison of nursing complaints between the two groups
GroupnRepeated puncture
The nurse has a bad attitude
Dosing error
Cumulative complaints
Number of cases (n)
Incidence (%)
Number of cases (n)
Incidence (%)
Number of cases (n)
Incidence (%)
Number of cases (n)
Incidence (%)
Control group6523.0811.5411.5446.15
Observation group6500.0000.0000.0000.00
χ24.127
P value0.042