Lv YS, Xue J, Meng Z, Zhang Q, Liu XH. Value of improved nursing measures and enhanced nursing management to reduce the occurrence of adverse events in pediatric infusion. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(20): 4130-4136 [PMID: 39015921 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4130]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Qing Zhang, BSc, Nurse, Department of Pediatrics, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 10 Tieyi Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100038, China. luyansong0342@bjsjth.cn
Research Domain of This Article
Pediatrics
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Jul 16, 2024; 12(20): 4130-4136 Published online Jul 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4130
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups
Group
n
Gender, n (%)
Age (mean ± SD)
Infusion time [(mean ± SD), d], χ2
Admission diagnosis disease type, n (%)
Male /Female
Respiratory diseases
Digestive system diseases
Nervous system disease
Urinary system disease
Control group
65
35 (53.85)/30 (46.15)
6.89 ± 2.12
5.85 ± 1.47
34 (52.31)
23 (35.38)
5 (7.69)
3 (4.62)
Observation group
65
33 (50.77)/32 (49.23)
6.82 ± 2.24
5.92 ± 1.43
32 (49.23)
24 (36.92)
7 (10.77)
2 (3.08)
χ2/t
0.123
0.160
0.241
0.615
P value
0.725
0.873
0.810
0.893
Table 2 Comparison of adverse infusion events between the two groups
Group
n
Fluid extravasation
Dosing error
Repeated puncture
Needle falls off
Number of cases (n)
Incidence (%)
Number of cases (n)
Incidence (%)
Number of cases (n)
Incidence (%)
Number of cases (n)
Incidence (%)
Control group
65
8
12.31
2
3.08
6
9.23
9
13.85
Observation group
65
2
3.08
0
0.00
2
3.08
1
1.54
χ2
3.900
2.031
2.131
0.693
P value
0.048
0.154
0.144
0.008
Table 3 Comparison of family satisfaction between the two groups, n (%)
Group
n
Very satisfied
Generally
Dissatisfied
Satisfaction
Control group
65
30 (46.15)
26 (40.00)
9 (13.85)
56 (86.15)
Observation group
65
46 (70.77)
17 (26.15)
2 (3.08)
63 (96.92)
χ2
4.866
P value
0.027
Table 4 Comparison of compliance between the two groups of children, n (%)
Group
n
Active compliance
Basic compliance
N on-compliance
Compliance rate
Control group
65
37 (56.92)
20 (30.77)
8 (12.31)
57 (87.69)
Observation group
65
48 (73.85)
16 (24.62)
1 (1.54)
64 (98.46)
χ2
5.849
P value
0.016
Table 5 Comparison of nursing complaints between the two groups
Group
n
Repeated puncture
The nurse has a bad attitude
Dosing error
Cumulative complaints
Number of cases (n)
Incidence (%)
Number of cases (n)
Incidence (%)
Number of cases (n)
Incidence (%)
Number of cases (n)
Incidence (%)
Control group
65
2
3.08
1
1.54
1
1.54
4
6.15
Observation group
65
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
0.00
χ2
4.127
P value
0.042
Citation: Lv YS, Xue J, Meng Z, Zhang Q, Liu XH. Value of improved nursing measures and enhanced nursing management to reduce the occurrence of adverse events in pediatric infusion. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(20): 4130-4136