Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 16, 2024; 12(2): 335-345
Published online Jan 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i2.335
Table 1 Basic characteristics of studies included

Ref.
No. of patients [Exp/Con (men/women)]
Course of disease, No. (Exp/Con)
Mean age or range (yr)
Experimental group
Control group
Treatment duration
Other outcomes
Standards for clinical efficacy appraisal
1Luo et al[23], 2001Exp 56 (22/34)Exp 5338.5 ± 8.6YXQNPlacebo30 d (1) Clinical efficacy; (2) Frequency of headache; (3) Duration of headache; and (4) Accompanying symptomsInvalid: No significant improvement in headache, reduction rate < 30%
Con 56 (20/36)Con 5437.6 ± 11
2Li et al[19], 2003Exp 79 (24/55)Exp 7937.2 ± 14.1YXQNSibelium capsules2 wkClinical efficacyInvalid: No significant improvement in headache, reduction rate < 25%
Con 71 (20/51)Con 7133.8 ± 13.8
3Li[18], 2003Exp 62 (-/-)Exp 6234 ± 5.2YXQNQuantianma capsule1 mo (1) Clinical efficacy; (2) Frequency of headache; (3) Duration of headache; and (4) Intensity of headacheInvalid: No significant improvement in headache frequency after treatment
Con 58 (-/-)Con 58
4Niu 2003[27]Exp 35 (-/-)Exp 35 (-/-)-YXQNSibelium capsules30 d (1) Clinical efficacy; (2) Frequency of headache; and (3) Duration of
headache
Invalid: No change in headache severity, < 30% fewer episodes
Con 35 (-/-)Con35 (-/-)-
5He et al[20], 2005Exp 64 (-/-)Exp 64 (-/-)33 ± 4.2YXQNSibelium capsules/placebo30 d (1) Clinical efficacy; (2) Frequency of headache; (3) Duration of headache; and (4) Intensity of headacheInvalid: No significant improvement in headache frequency after treatment
Con 40 (-/-)Con 40 (-/-)
Placebo 56 (-/-)Placebo 56 (-/-)
6Bai[20], 2011Exp 28 (9/19)Exp 28 (9/19)19-42YXQNSibelium capsules8 wk (1) Clinical efficacy; and (2) Adverse reactionsInvalid: No significant improvement in headache frequency after treatment
Con 28 (8/20)Con 28 (8/20)18-42
7Li and Liu[26], 2012Exp 59 (28/31)Exp 59 (28/31)42 ± 6YXQNSibelium capsules1 mo(1) Clinical efficacy; (2) Frequency of headache; and (3) Duration of headacheInvalid: Headache score decreased < 35% after treatment
Con 59 (22/37)Con 59 (22/37)43 ± 5
8Zhang and Kuang[22], 2015Exp 59 (21/19)Exp 59 (21/19)32.8YXQNRotundinum8 wk(1) Clinical efficacy; and (2) AdversereactionsInvalid: No significant improvement in headache, reduction rate < 50%
Con 59 (17/23)Con 59 (17/23)33.5
9Xie and Peng[24], 2017Exp 75 (30/45)Exp 75 (30/45)38.91 ± 7.1YXQNPlacebo1 mo(1) Clinical efficacy; (2) Frequency of headache; (3) Duration of headache; (4) Intensity of headache; and (5) Adverse reactionsInvalid: No significant improvement in headache frequency after treatment
Con 75 (32/43)Con 75 (32/43)39.33 ± 6.89
10Jiang[29], 2019Exp 34 (13/21)Exp 34 (13/21)52.3 ± 3.2YXQNSibelium capsules30 d(1) Clinical efficacy; (2) Intensity of headache; (3) Duration of headacheInvalid: No change in headache severity, < 30% fewer episodes
Con 26 (10/16)Con 26 (10/16)54.2 ± 2.8
11Jiang[25], 2020Exp 45 (21/24)Exp 45 (21/24)43.5 ± 2.5YXQNSibelium capsules1 mo(1) Clinical efficacy; (2) Frequency of headache; and (3) Duration of headacheInvalid: No significant improvement in headache frequency after treatment
Con 45 (20/25)Con 45 (20/25)44.5 ± 3.5
12Wang[28], 2021Exp 42 (16/26)47.3 ± 6.4YXQNToutongning Capsules1 mo(1) Clinical efficacy; (2) Frequency of headache; (3) Duration of headache; and (4) Intensity of headacheInvalid: No significant improvement in headache frequency after treatment
Con 42 (17/25)46.4 ± 6.1