Efficacy and safety analysis of continued nursing of complications in discharged patients after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage

Table 1 Basic characteristics of included literature

Ref.	Intervention group/control group (n)	Post discharge intervention measures		Outcome indicators for complications
		Control group	Intervention group
Yan et al[6], 2012	51/48	Regular health	Regular health guidance + telephone intervention	4, 6, 7
Mai et al[7], 2015	30/30	Telephone follow-up	Continuing care intervention	1, 6, 7, 9
Yu et al[8], 2016	30/30	Regular health education	Regular health education + continuing care	1, 5
Ou et al[9], 2017	50/50	Telephone follow-up	Continuous care model on mobile platforms	1, 6, 7, 4
Ji et al[10], 2018	54/54	Usual care	Nurse led "hospital community family" linkage	1, 2, 3, 4
Chen et al[11], 2019	50/50	Usual care	Extended care	1, 2, 3, 4
Huang et al[12], 2019	50/50	Regular health education	QR code management	1, 6, 7, 10
Wang et al[13], 2021	75/75	Regular health education	Regular health education + WeChat group	1, 6, 7, 4
Li et al[14], 2022	39/38	Usual care	Routine care + continuity of case management	1, 3, 6, 7

Table 2 Methodological quality results of the JBI quality evaluation tool included in the literature evaluation

Ref.	Randomization	Analysis of results of randomized study subjects by inclusion group	Same evaluation method	The evaluation method is reliable	Appropriate statistical methods	Reasonable experimental design
Yan et al[6], 2012	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Mai et al[7], 2015	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Yu et al[8], 2016	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Ou et al[9], 2017	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Ji et al[10], 2018	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Chen et al[11], 2019	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Huang et al[12], 2019	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Wang et al[13], 2021	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Li et al[14], 2022	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes