Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 6, 2024; 12(19): 3807-3814
Published online Jul 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i19.3807
Table 1 Comparison of patient general information, n (%)
Feature
Observation group (n = 30)
Control group (n = 30)
P value
Age56.16 ± 8.8555.44 ± 6.24> 0.05
Gender (male/female)18/1220/10
Reason for admission
Cerebrovascular disease12 (40)10 (33.3)
Traumatic brain injury8 (26.7)10 (33.3)
Other10 (33.3)10 (33.3)
Body mass index25.51 ± 2.7427.61 ± 2.72
Past medical history
Hypertension14 (46.7)16 (53.3)
Diabetes10 (33.3)12 (40)
Heart disease6 (20)8 (26.7)
Table 2 Comparison of pressure injury rates
Group
Observation group
Control group
F
P value
7 d13-6.83< 0.05
14 d27
Table 3 Recovery process comparison
Group
Observation group
Control group
t
P value
Time to get out of bed (h)48.14 ± 6.3671.54 ± 7.62-12.91 < 0.01
Length of hospital stay (d)12.1 ± 1.7414.27 ± 3.61-3.10
Table 4 Comparison of quality of life scores after intervention
Group
Observation group
Control group
t
P value
Body satisfaction score84.99 ± 5.7270.14 ± 4.9610.74 < 0.01
Sensory and functional scores80.37 ± 2.9664.16 ± 7.9510.46
Table 5 Comparison of comfort scores after intervention
Group
Observation group
Control group
t
P value
Psychological comfort score85.98 ± 4.4970.83 ± 6.510.51 < 0.01
Physical comfort score78.9 ± 5.5267.4 ± 7.030.47