Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 6, 2024; 12(19): 3725-3733
Published online Jul 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i19.3725
Published online Jul 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i19.3725
Table 1 Comparison of general information between two groups of patients [n/mean ± SD)]
| General information | Group | χ2/F | P value | ||
| Regular group (30) | EMGBF group (30) | Intensive EMGBF group (30) | |||
| Gender (Male/Female) | 16/14 | 14/16 | 17/13 | 0.623 | 0.732 |
| Average age (yr) | 66.63 ± 1.32 | 65.62 ± 1.31 | 66.27 ± 2.14 | 2.935 | 0.058 |
| Duration of disease(yr) | 4.31 ± 0.67 | 4.33 ± 0.25 | 4.34 ± 0.25 | 0.036 | 0.964 |
| Lesion site | |||||
| Hemispheres | 14 | 17 | 18 | 1.165 | 0.559 |
| Brainstem | 16 | 13 | 12 | ||
- Citation: Meng QN, Zhu Y, Liu SW, Hu B, Chai DJ, Dong CX. Study on the treatment of dysphagia after stroke with electromyographic biofeedback intensive training. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(19): 3725-3733
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i19/3725.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i19.3725