Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 6, 2024; 12(19): 3701-3707
Published online Jul 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i19.3701
Published online Jul 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i19.3701
Table 1 Comparison of patients' general data
Group | Experimental group | Control group | F/t | P value |
Age (yr) | 64.90 ± 5.31 | 65.73 ± 3.15 | -0.736 | 0.46 |
Gender (Male/female) | 13/17 | 14/ 16 | 0.59 | 0.44 |
Body mass index | 24.37 ± 1.81 | 23.96 ± 2.13 | 0.80 | 0.42 |
Smoking history (pack/yr) | 16/14 | 15/ 14 | 0.64 | 0.42 |
High blood pressure (Yes/No) | 14/16 | 13/17 | 0.58 | 0.44 |
Diabetes (Yes/No) | 8/22 | 7/23 | 0.59 | 0.45 |
Glycosylated hemoglobin (%) | 6.50 ± 0.68 | 5.51 ± 0.72 | -0.07 | 0.94 |
Total cholesterol (mmoL/L) | 5.48 ± 0.68 | 5.68 ± 0.72 | -1.09 | 0.28 |
Triglyceride (mmoL/L) | 1.65.48 ± 0.49 | 1.58 ± 0.42 | -2.53 | 0.20 |
Low density lipoprotein (mmoL/L) | 3.18 ± 0.55 | 3.50 ± 0.45 | -1.60 | 0.11 |
Phospholipid protein A1 (g/L) | 1.06 ± 0.21 | 0.98 ± 0.17 | 1.58 | 0.12 |
Phospholipid protein B (g/L) | 1.57 ± 0.35 | 1.53 ± 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.67 |
Lipoprotein (mg/dL) | 127.25 ± 7.93 | 134.42 ± 9.39 | -1.92 | 0.06 |
Table 2 Comparison of anxiety and depression between the two groups before and after intervention
Group | n | SAS | SDS | ||
Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | ||
Experimental group | 30.00 | 57.33 ± 3.01 | 41.33 ± 3.42 | 50.40 ± 1.45 | 39.47 ± 1.57 |
Control group | 30.00 | 56.27 ± 2.89 | 44.9 ± 3.1 | 52.77 ± 1.43 | 41.37 ± 1.35 |
t | -2.37 | -1.90 | 1.07 | -3.57 | |
P value | 0.37 | P < 0.01 | 0.17 | P < 0.01 |
Table 3 Comparison of compliance patterns between the two groups before and after intervention
Group | n | Face therapy | Avoidance therapy | ||
Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | ||
Experimental group | 30.00 | 17.20 ± 1.75 | 13.13 ± 1.38 | 21.63 ± 1.54 | 13.70 ± 1.62 |
Control group | 30.00 | 17.37 ± 0.96 | 15.67 ± 1.08 | 22.27 ± 1.29 | 15.13 ± 1.55 |
t | 0.23 | -3.54 | -0.63 | -1.43 | |
P value | 0.45 | P < 0.01 | 0.09 | P < 0.01 |
Table 4 Comparison of treatment compliance between the two groups after intervention
Group | n | Complete compliance | Partial compliance | Noncompliance |
Experimental group | 30 | 18 | 8 | 4 |
Control group | 30 | 10 | 12 | 8 |
χ2 value | 3.96 | |||
P value | 0.047 |
Table 5 Comparison of pelvic floor function between the two groups before and after intervention
Group | n | Bladder function | Gastrointestinal function | ||
Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | ||
Experimental group | 30 | 16.83 ± 1.72 | 10.47 ± 1.3 | 23.27 ± 3.37 | 13.60 ± 1.30 |
Control group | 30 | 15.9 ± 1.16 | 10.2 ± 1.22 | 24.67 ± 2.92 | 14.77 ± 1.48 |
t | 0.27 | 0.93 | -1.40 | -1.17 | |
P value | 0.42 | 0.02 | 0.09 | P < 0.01 |
- Citation: Wei J, Li BWX, Han SJ, Zhuang HJ, Cao WH. Effect of continuous nursing on treatment compliance and side effect management of coronary heart disease. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(19): 3701-3707
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i19/3701.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i19.3701