Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 26, 2024; 12(18): 3491-3496
Published online Jun 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i18.3491
Published online Jun 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i18.3491
Table 1 compares serum levels of interleukin-4, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 (mean ± SD)
| Groups | Time | Interleukin-4 (pg/mL) | Interleukin-6 (pg/mL) | Interleukin-10 (pg/mL) |
| Research group (n = 64) | Before treatment | 10.24 ± 1.15 | 10.11 ± 1.24 | 14.24 ± 2.15 |
| After treatment | 4.11 ± 0.45 | 5.05 ± 0.47 | 7.04 ± 0.61 | |
| Control group (n = 64) | Before treatment | 10.22 ± 1.16 | 10.09 ± 1.22 | 14.22 ± 2.18 |
| After treatment | 6.64 ± 0.57 | 6.68 ± 0.51 | 9.64 ± 0.75 | |
| t/P value Research group (before and after treatment) | 39.711/0.000 | 30.526/0.000 | 25.773/0.000 | |
| t/P value Control group (before and after treatment) | 22.159/0.000 | 20.631/0.000 | 15.893/0.000 | |
| t/P value Between-group values (before treatment) | 0.098/0.922 | 0.092/0.927 | 0.052/0.958 | |
| t/P value Between-group values (post-treatment) | 27.870/0.000 | 18.802/0.000 | 21.515/0.000 | |
Table 2 compares anal incontinence scores (mean ± SD)
| Groups | Before surgery | 7 d after surgery | 14 d after surgery | 21 d after surgery | 28 d after surgery |
| Research group (n = 64) | 4.05 ± 0.54 | 11.24 ± 1.15 | 7.24 ± 0.54 | 5.11 ± 0.48 | 4.05 ± 0.78 |
| Control group (n = 64) | 4.03 ± 0.55 | 11.22 ± 1.12 | 9.05 ± 0.64 | 8.24 ± 0.51 | 6.28 ± 0.81 |
| t value | 0.208 | 0.100 | 17.292 | 35.753 | 15.865 |
| P value | 0.836 | 0.921 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Table 3 Comparison results of serum motilin, 5-hydroxytryptamine, and vasoactive intestinal peptide levels between groups (mean ± SD)
| Groups | Time | Serum motilin (ng/L) | 5-hydroxytryptamine (pg/mL) | Vasoactive intestinal peptide (pg/mL) |
| Research group (n = 64) | Before treatment | 253.24 ± 25.54 | 63.54 ± 2.18 | 75.54 ± 5.54 |
| After treatment | 312.24 ± 28.68 | 82.54 ± 6.45 | 48.04 ± 2.15 | |
| Control group (n = 64) | Before treatment | 252.87 ± 25.68 | 63.64 ± 2.17 | 75.61 ± 5.49 |
| After treatment | 284.64 ± 26.05 | 70.55 ± 6.54 | 58.64 ± 3.24 | |
| t/P value Research group (before and after treatment) | 12.291/0.000 | 22.325/0.000 | 37.021/0.000 | |
| t/P value Control group (before and after treatment) | 6.948/0.000 | 8.023/0.000 | 21.296/0.000 | |
| t/P value Between-group values (before treatment) | 0.082/0.935 | 0.260/0.795 | 0.072/0.943 | |
| t/P value Between-group values (post-treatment) | 5.699/0.000 | 10.443/0.000 | 21.808/0.000 | |
- Citation: Liu ZL, He YW, Liu YF, Wang N, Li W, Shen LZ. A comparative study of acupuncture combined with rehabilitation gymnastics on postoperative anal function of lower rectal cancer. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(18): 3491-3496
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i18/3491.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i18.3491