Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 26, 2024; 12(18): 3378-3384
Published online Jun 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i18.3378
Table 1 Comparison of basic clinical data of two groups
GroupnSex
Age (yr)Course of disease (yr)Educational background (n)
Male
Female
Junior high school or below
High school
Above high school
Insulin pump group2101149632.65 ± 9.1412.45 ± 2.16508872
Insulin subcutaneous injection group21011010033.01 ± 9.5313.04 ± 2.58469074
Statistical value-0.0850.3952.5410.9198
P value-0.7700.6930.0110.6313
Table 2 Comparison of levels of blood sugar after treatment in two groups of patients
Group
n
Fasting blood glucose
2 h postprandial blood glucose
Insulin pump group2105.67 ± 1.588.41 ± 1.27
Insulin subcutaneous injection group2106.58 ± 1.079.35 ± 1.59
Statistical value-6.9106.694
P value-< 0.001< 0.001
Table 3 Comparison of pain scores of two groups
Group
n
0
1
2
3
4
Insulin pump group210126443460
Insulin subcutaneous injection group210767842122
Statistical value-23.844
P value-< 0.001
Table 4 Comparison of pregnancy complications and pregnancy outcomes between the two groups
Group
n
Amniotic fluid contamination
Oligohydramnios
Preeclampsia
Premature rupture of membranes
Macrosomia
Fetal distress
Insulin pump group210866222
Insulin subcutaneous injection group2101410826416
Statistical value-1.7271.040.29622.0410.67611.376
P value-0.1890.3080.586< 0.0010.4110.001
Table 5 Comparison of levels of insulin pump group, subcutaneous injection group, secreted frizzled-related protein 5, homocysteine and C1q/TNF-related protein 9
Variable
Insulin pump group (n = 210)
Insulin subcutaneous injection group (n = 210)
t/χ2
P value
SFRP5 (mmol/L)6.72 ± 1.056.08 ± 1.265.655< 0.001
Hcy (mmol/L)5.27 ± 2.027.04 ± 1.4810.243< 0.001
CTRP9 (mmol/L)46.28 ± 8.1538.86 ± 6.5410.290< 0.001