Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 26, 2024; 12(18): 3360-3367
Published online Jun 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i18.3360
Table 1 Baseline information
Classification
Research group (n = 60)
Control group (n = 57)
χ2/t
P value
Age (yr)58.53 ± 7.4956.84 ± 5.551.3810.170
Sex (male/female)40/2034/230.6190.431
Disease course (yr)2.43 ± 1.012.23 ± 0.821.1720.244
Pathological stage (IIIa/IIIb)35/2540/171.7810.182
Differentiation degree (low/moderate or high)21/3922/350.1630.687
Tumor diameter (cm)3.71 ± 0.693.47 ± 0.791.7530.082
Table 2 Effect of cetuximab + FOLFOX4 regimen on the clinical response of advanced gastric carcinoma patients receiving evidence-based care, n (%)
Classification
Research group (n = 60)
Control group (n = 57)
χ2
P value
CR12 (20.00)2 (3.51)
PR39 (65.00)27 (47.37)
SD5 (8.33)17 (29.82)
PD4 (6.67)11 (19.30)
RR51 (85.00)29 (50.88)15.740< 0.001
DCR56 (93.33)46 (80.70)4.1730.041
Table 3 Effect of cetuximab + FOLFOX4 regimen on safety in advanced gastric carcinoma patients receiving evidence-based care, n (%)
Classification
Research group (n = 60)
Control group (n = 57)
χ2
P value
Liver and kidney dysfunction0 (0.00)0 (0.00)
Leukopenia1 (1.67)1 (1.75)
Thrombocytopenia1 (1.67)2 (3.51)
Rash3 (5.00)3 (5.26)
Diarrhea1 (1.67)2 (3.51)
Total6 (10.00)8 (14.04)0.4520.502
Table 4 Influence of the cetuximab + FOLFOX4 regimen on the improvement in quality of life in advanced gastric carcinoma patients receiving evidence-based care, n (%)
Classification
Research group (n = 60)
Control group (n = 57)
χ2
P value
Enhancement43 (71.67)30 (52.63)4.5140.034
Stability15 (25.00)23 (40.35)3.1410.076
Decline2 (3.33)4 (7.02)0.8160.367