Shen LL, Shi J, Ding CW, Dai GL, Ma Q. Diagnostic efficacy of virtual organ computer-assisted analysis in measuring the volume ratio of subchorionic hematoma with serum progesterone. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(17): 3053-3060 [PMID: 38898843 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i17.3053]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Qi Ma, MD, Chief Physician, Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 1055 Sanxiang Road, Gusu District, Suzhou 215004, Jiangsu Province, China. maqisz@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Medicine, General & Internal
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Jun 16, 2024; 12(17): 3053-3060 Published online Jun 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i17.3053
Table 1 Comparison of the demographic data between the two groups, n (%)
Adverse pregnancy group (n = 57)
Normal pregnancy group (n = 96)
P value
Age
29.4 (4.2)
28.9 (3.5)
0.424
Parity
0.390
Primipara
31 (53.8)
58 (60.4)
Multipara
26 (46.2)
38 (39.6)
Vaginal bleeding
0.028
Yes
24 (42.1)
17 (17.7)
No
33 (57.9)
79 (82.3)
Abdominal pain
0.891
Yes
33 (57.9)
58 (60.4)
No
24 (42.1)
38 (39.6)
Hysteromyoma
1.000
Yes
3 (5.3)
4 (4.2)
No
54 (94.7)
92 (95.8)
Diabetes before pregnancy
0.713
Yes
2 (3.5)
4 (4.2)
No
55 (96.5)
92 (95.8)
Chronic hypertension
1.000
Yes
2 (3.5)
3 (3.1)
No
55 (96.5)
93 (96.9)
Table 2 Comparison of ultrasound parameters between patients in the adverse and normal pregnancy groups
Adverse pregnancy group (n = 57)
Normal pregnancy group (n = 96)
P value
SCH
Cs (cm)
4.6 (3.1, 6)
3.2 (2.1, 4.2)
< 0.001
Ss (cm2)
2.1 (1.5, 3)
1.3 (0.8, 1.9)
< 0.001
3DVs (cm3)
2.9 (2.2, 3.5)
1.5 (0.6, 2.4)
< 0.001
GS
Cg (cm)
9 (7.2, 10.5)
9.2 (7.9, 11.6)
0.214
Sg (cm2)
6.6 (3.6, 9.9)
7.1 (4.4, 10.7)
0.411
3DVg (cm3)
8.4 (5.3, 15.6)
12.6 (6.4, 21.3)
0.057
SCH/GS
Cs/Cg
0.5 (0.4, 0.6)
0.3 (0.2, 0.4)
< 0.001
Ss/Sg
0.3 (0.2, 0.5)
0.2 (0.1, 0.3)
< 0.001
3DVs/3DVg
0.3 (0.2, 0.5)
0.1 (0.1, 0.2)
< 0.001
Table 3 Differential diagnostic efficacy of different subchorionic hematoma sizes for adverse versus normal pregnancy
ROC
Cut-off
Sensibility
Specificity
Positive predictive value
Negative predictive value
Cs (cm)
0.671 (0.579, 0.763)
4.340
0.561
0.760
0.582
0.745
Ss (cm2)
0.697 (0.611, 0.784)
1.350
0.825
0.510
0.500
0.830
3DVs (cm3)
0.743 (0.661, 0.826)
2.180
0.807
0.719
0.630
0.863
Cs/Cg
0.262 (0.180, 0.344)
0.400
0.737
0.677
0.575
0.713
Ss/Sg
0.710 (0.624, 0.797)
0.360
0.474
0.885
0.711
0.739
3DVs/3DVg
0.767 (0.691, 0.844)
0.220
0.702
0.750
0.625
0.809
Table 4 3DVs/3DVg and progesterone for early adverse pregnancy
ROC
Cut-off
Sensibility
Specificity
Positive predictive value
Negative predictive value
3DVs/3DVg
0.767 (0.691, 0.844)
0.220
0.702
0.750
0.625
0.809
Progesterone
0.649 (0.557, 0.741)
18.2
0.677
0.625
0.756
0.530
3DVs/3DVg combined progesterone
0.824 (0.756, 0.891)
0.664
0.770
0.821
0.881
0.676
Citation: Shen LL, Shi J, Ding CW, Dai GL, Ma Q. Diagnostic efficacy of virtual organ computer-assisted analysis in measuring the volume ratio of subchorionic hematoma with serum progesterone. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(17): 3053-3060