Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 16, 2024; 12(17): 3035-3044
Published online Jun 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i17.3035
Table 1 Comparison of the general data between the two groups, n (%)
General information
Control group (n = 51)
Case management unit (n = 52)
χ2/t
P value
Sex0.0920.762
    Male28 (54.90)27 (51.92)
    Female23 (45.10)25 (48.08)
Age (mean ± SD), yr57.85 ± 9.7458.22 ± 10.140.1890.851
BMI (mean ± SD), kg/m222.06 ± 2.2721.98 ± 2.330.1760.860
Number of lesion branches0.8680.648
    Single vessel disease12 (23.53)15 (28.85)
    Double vessel disease19 (37.25)21 (40.38)
    Three or more lesions20 (39.22)16 (30.77)
Educational background0.9200.631
    Junior high school and below14 (27.45)12 (23.08)
    Secondary to tertiary21 (41.18)19 (36.54)
    Bachelor’s degree or above16 (31.37)21 (40.38)
Concomitant disease
    Hypertension31 (60.78)27 (51.92)0.8220.365
    Diabetes22 (43.14)19 (36.54)0.4680.494
    Smoking history11 (21.57)14 (26.92)0.4020.526
    Drinking history13 (25.49)12 (23.08)0.0820.775
Table 2 Comparison of psychological status scores between the two groups (mean ± SD, scores)
Norm
Timing
Control group (n = 51)
Case management unit (n = 52)
t
P value
SDS scoreBefore intervention57.01 ± 4.5156.36 ± 4.850.7040.483
After intervention48.78 ± 3.26a42.95 ± 3.21a9.1450.000
SAS scoreBefore intervention61.74 ± 4.0562.07 ± 3.870.4230.673
After intervention53.23 ± 3.45a47.05 ± 3.21a7.8910.000
Table 3 Comparison of compliance scores between the two groups (mean ± SD, scores)
Norm
Timing
Control group (n = 51)
Case management unit (n = 52)
t
P value
Sensible dietBefore intervention61.12 ± 5.7159.98 ± 6.030.9850.327
After intervention75.47 ± 6.89a83.69 ± 5.78a6.5650.000
Take medicine on timeBefore intervention58.82 ± 6.1459.77 ± 5.870.8030.424
After intervention77.14 ± 6.82a86.58 ± 7.96a6.4580.000
Good living habitsBefore intervention63.36 ± 5.1562.24 ± 5.831.0330.304
After intervention74.14 ± 6.16a85.02 ± 5.97a9.1030.000
Reasonable exerciseBefore intervention52.89 ± 8.4154.12 ± 7.760.7720.442
After intervention70.24 ± 7.53a82.96 ± 8.04a8.2840.000
Timely reviewBefore intervention66.63 ± 5.8764.97 ± 6.081.4090.162
After intervention76.36 ± 6.96a85.04 ± 7.71a5.9940.000
Table 4 Comparison of coronary heart disease self-management scale scores between the two groups (mean ± SD, scores)
Norm
Timing
Control group (n = 51)
Case management unit (n = 52)
t
P value
Bad habitBefore intervention14.89 ± 2.1415.04 ± 1.960.3710.711
After intervention16.01 ± 1.47a17.52 ± 1.33a5.4690.000
SymptomBefore intervention8.41 ± 1.568.27 ± 1.630.4450.657
After intervention10.78 ± 1.27a12.32 ± 1.36a5.9370.000
Emotional cognitionBefore intervention9.89 ± 1.249.77 ± 1.310.4770.634
After intervention11.08 ± 1.36a12.24 ± 1.42a4.2330.000
First aidBefore intervention7.14 ± 1.567.08 ± 1.720.1850.853
After intervention8.77 ± 1.39a9.88 ± 1.45a3.9650.000
Disease knowledgeBefore intervention11.47 ± 2.0811.53 ± 1.970.1500.881
After intervention14.88 ± 2.42a15.77 ± 1.98a2.0450.043
General lifeBefore intervention11.05 ± 1.8710.96 ± 1.930.2400.811
After intervention14.47 ± 1.93a15.78 ± 1.88a3.4900.001
Treatment complianceBefore intervention5.87 ± 1.425.79 ± 1.370.2910.772
After intervention7.54 ± 1.12a8.25 ± 1.06a3.3050.001
CSMS total scoreBefore intervention68.72 ± 5.1668.44 ± 4.970.2810.780
After intervention83.63 ± 6.96a91.76 ± 7.14a5.8500.000
Table 5 Comparison of knowledge mastery scores between the two groups (mean ± SD, scores)
Norm
Timing
Control group (n = 51)
Case management unit (n = 52)
t
P value
Understanding of coronary heart diseaseBefore intervention17.85 ± 3.0218.04 ± 2.880.3270.744
After intervention21.12 ± 2.11a23.65 ± 1.74a6.6450.000
Necessity of taking medicine regularlyBefore intervention16.52 ± 2.4716.41 ± 2.580.2210.826
After intervention21.53 ± 2.11a23.74 ± 1.06a6.7360.000
Key points of self-care after CABGBefore intervention14.24 ± 2.6913.97 ± 3.780.4170.678
After intervention20.14 ± 3.23a23.12 ± 1.58a5.9650.000
Precautions after CABG surgeryBefore intervention18.85 ± 2.2519.04 ± 2.110.4420.659
After intervention22.05 ± 1.07a23.74 ± 0.77a9.2140.000
Table 6 Comparison of quality of life scores between the two groups (mean ± SD, scores)
Norm
Timing
Control group (n = 51)
Case management unit (n = 52)
t
P value
StaminaBefore intervention27.74 ± 8.2625.83 ± 9.541.0850.280
After intervention32.26 ± 6.97a38.97 ± 8.15a4.4870.000
State of an illnessBefore intervention14.53 ± 3.8515.01 ± 3.940.6250.533
After intervention17.45 ± 4.11a20.58 ± 3.89a3.9700.000
Medical treatmentBefore intervention4.96 ± 0.854.86 ± 0.940.5660.573
After intervention5.12 ± 0.795.22 ± 0.850.6180.538
General conditionBefore intervention7.54 ± 1.877.46 ± 1.930.2140.831
After intervention8.74 ± 1.91a9.85 ± 1.67a3.1420.002
Social psychologyBefore intervention15.12 ± 2.2514.97 ± 2.310.3340.739
After intervention17.63 ± 2.16a19.87 ± 2.04a5.4120.000
ProfessionalBefore intervention4.25 ± 0.984.19 ± 1.050.3000.765
After intervention5.77 ± 1.12a6.85 ± 1.24a4.6360.000
Table 7 Comparison of major adverse cardiac events between the two groups, n (%)
MACE event
Control group (n = 51)
Case management unit (n = 52)
χ2/t
P value
Myocardial infarction1 (1.96)0 (0.00)
Heart failure1 (1.96)1 (1.92)
Malignant arrhythmia2 (3.92)1 (1.92)
Cardiac readmission5 (9.80)2 (3.85)
Cerebral apoplexy1 (1.96)0 (0.00)
reCABG1 (1.96)0 (0.00)
Cumulative MACE incidence11 (21.57)4 (7.69)3.9850.046