Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 6, 2024; 12(16): 2751-2757
Published online Jun 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i16.2751
Table 1 Descriptive statistics of the participants, n (%)/mean ± SD
Variable
Intervention group (n = 40)
Control group (n = 40)
P value
Age (Yr)35.6 ± 9.836.2 ± 10.20.76
Gender0.93
    Male22 (55)23 (57.5)
    Female18 (45)17 (42.5)
Education (yr)10.4 ± 3.210.2 ± 3.40.82
Duration of illness (months)48.7 ± 24.650.3 ± 26.10.79
PANSS total score86.5 ± 14.387.2 ± 15.10.84
CGI severity score4.8 ± 0.94.9 ± 0.80.71
SF-36 total score42.3 ± 8.741.9 ± 9.20.88
Table 2 Inferential statistics of the outcome variables, mean ± SD
Variable
Intervention group (n = 40)
Control group (n = 40)
P value
PANSS total score< 0.001
Before treatment86.5 ± 14.387.2 ± 15.10.84
After treatment58.7 ± 12.473.4 ± 13.6< 0.001
Change-27.8 ± 9.7-13.8 ± 8.9< 0.001
CGI severity score< 0.001
Before treatment4.8 ± 0.94.9 ± 0.80.71
After treatment3.1 ± 0.74.1 ± 0.9< 0.001
Change-1.7 ± 0.6-0.8 ± 0.7< 0.001
SF-36 total score< 0.001
After treatment58.4 ± 10.248.6 ± 11.3< 0.001
Change16.1 ± 7.86.7 ± 8.4< 0.001
SF-36 domains
Physical functioning 64.5 ± 15.461.3 ± 16.70.29
Role-physical56.3 ± 18.743.8 ± 19.4< 0.001
Bodily pain60.0 ± 17.648.8 ± 18.9< 0.001
General health52.5 ± 12.944.4 ± 14.3< 0.001
Vitality55.0 ± 13.446.3 ± 14.7< 0.001
Social functioning62.5 ± 16.851.3 ± 18.2< 0.001
Role-emotional58.8 ± 19.645.0 ± 21.4< 0.001
Mental health59.4 ± 15.249.4 ± 16.8< 0.001
Table 3 The impact of psychological nursing interventions on the efficacy and quality of life of patients with schizophrenia receiving modified electroconvulsive therapy
Theme
Description
Quote
SatisfactionPatients and nurses expressed high satisfaction with PNI, and reported that it was helpful, supportive, and informative“PNI helped me to understand and cope with my condition and treatment, and the nurses were very patient and friendly, I felt respected and cared for” (Patient 1)
“PNI is a comprehensive and individualized approach that meets the different needs and preferences of the patients, I think it is very beneficial for their recovery and well-being” (Nurse 2)
Improvement in symptoms and functioningPatients and nurses reported that PNI improved the symptoms and functioning of the patients, such as reducing hallucinations and delusions, enhancing mood and motivation, and increasing social and occupational activities“PNI taught me how to cope and manage my stress and emotions, I felt my symptoms were reduced, and I was more willing to communicate and cooperate with my family and friends” (Patient 3)
“PNI improved the medication adherence and treatment outcome of the patients, I observed that their positive and negative symptoms were significantly improved, and their cognition and memory were also restored” (Nurse 4)
Reduction in adverse effects of MECTPatients and nurses reported that PNI reduced the adverse effects of MECT, such as cognitive impairment and memory loss“PNI helped me to understand and deal with the side effects of MECT, I did not feel as headache and nausea as before, and my memory was not affected too much” (Patient 5)
“PNI reduced the cognitive and memory impairment of MECT on the patients, by providing psychoeducation, promoting medication adherence, and enhancing coping skills, and increased the safety and comfort of the patients” (Nurse 6)
Enhancement in quality of lifePatients and nurses reported that PNI enhanced the quality of life of the patients, such as improving their self-esteem, self-care, and relationships“PNI enhanced my confidence and self-esteem, I felt I had the ability and value to do some meaningful things, and I also cared more about my health and appearance” (Patient 7)