Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. May 26, 2024; 12(15): 2551-2559
Published online May 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i15.2551
Published online May 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i15.2551
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study participants
Variable | UAE group (n = 87) | Control group (n = 87) | P value |
Age (yr) | 34.6 ± 4.2 | 34.8 ± 4.1 | 0.76 |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.3 ± 3.5 | 24.5 ± 3.4 | 0.68 |
Parity | 0.9 ± 0.8 | 0.8 ± 0.7 | 0.54 |
Number of fibroids | 2.4 ± 1.2 | 2.3 ± 1.1 | 0.59 |
Size of largest fibroid (cm) | 5.6 ± 1.8 | 5.5 ± 1.7 | 0.71 |
Location of fibroids, n (%) | 0.82 | ||
Submucosal | 12 (13.8) | 14 (16.1) | |
Intramural | 48 (55.2) | 46 (52.9) | |
Subserosal | 27 (31.0) | 27 (31.0) | |
Type of fibroids, n (%) | 0.77 | ||
Pedunculated | 9 (10.3) | 8 (9.2) | |
Sessile | 78 (89.7) | 79 (90.8) |
Table 2 Ovarian function and fertility of the study participants (mean ± SD)
Variable | UAE group (n = 87) | Control group (n = 87) | P value |
FSH (IU/L) | |||
Baseline | 6.4 ± 1.2 | 6.5 ± 1.1 | 0.69 |
6 months | 6.6 ± 1.3 | 6.7 ± 1.2 | 0.72 |
12 months | 6.7 ± 1.4 | 6.8 ± 1.3 | 0.75 |
24 months | 6.9 ± 1.5 | 7.0 ± 1.4 | 0.78 |
36 months | 7.1 ± 1.6 | 7.2 ± 1.5 | 0.81 |
Change from baseline to 36 months | 0.7 ± 0.8 | 0.7 ± 0.7 | 0.83 |
LH (IU/L) | |||
Baseline | 4.3 ± 1.1 | 4.4 ± 1.0 | 0.66 |
6 months | 4.5 ± 1.2 | 4.6 ± 1.1 | 0.68 |
12 months | 4.6 ± 1.3 | 4.7 ± 1.2 | 0.71 |
24 months | 4.8 ± 1.4 | 4.9 ± 1.3 | 0.74 |
36 months | 5.0 ± 1.5 | 5.1 ± 1.4 | 0.77 |
Change from baseline to 36 months | 0.7 ± 0.9 | 0.7 ± 0.8 | 0.79 |
E2 (pg/mL) | |||
Baseline | 68.2 ± 15.4 | 69.3 ± 14.6 | 0.62 |
6 months | 70.4 ± 16.2 | 71.5 ± 15.4 | 0.64 |
12 months | 72.6 ± 17.0 | 73.7 ± 16.2 | 0.66 |
24 months | 74.8 ± 17.8 | 75.9 ± 17.0 | 0.68 |
36 months | 77.0 ± 18.6 | 78.1 ± 17.8 | 0.70 |
Change from baseline to 36 months | 8.8 ± 10.2 | 8.8 ± 9.6 | 0.72 |
AMH (ng/mL) | |||
Baseline | 3.2 ± 1.4 | 3.3 ± 1.3 | 0.67 |
6 months | 3.1 ± 1.3 | 3.2 ± 1.2 | 0.69 |
12 months | 3.0 ± 1.2 | 3.1 ± 1.1 | 0.71 |
24 months | 2.9 ± 1.1 | 3.0 ± 1.0 | 0.73 |
36 months | 2.8 ± 1.0 | 2.9 ± 0.9 | 0.75 |
Change from baseline to 36 months | -0.4 ± 0.6 | -0.4 ± 0.5 | 0.77 |
AFC | |||
Baseline | 12.4 ± 3.2 | 12.6 ± 3.1 | 0.65 |
6 months | 12.2 ± 3.1 | 12.4 ± 3.0 | 0.67 |
12 months | 12.0 ± 3.0 | 12.2 ± 2.9 | 0.69 |
24 months | 11.8 ± 2.9 | 12.0 ± 2.8 | 0.71 |
36 months | 11.6 ± 2.8 | 11.8 ± 2.7 | 0.73 |
Change from baseline to 36 months | -0.8 ± 1.2 | -0.8 ± 1.1 | 0.75 |
OV (mL) | |||
Baseline | 8.6 ± 2.1 | 8.8 ± 2.0 | 0.63 |
6 months | 8.4 ± 2.0 | 8.6 ± 1.9 | 0.65 |
12 months | 8.2 ± 1.9 | 8.4 ± 1.8 | 0.67 |
24 months | 8.0 ± 1.8 | 8.2 ± 1.7 | 0.69 |
36 months | 7.8 ± 1.7 | 8.0 ± 1.6 | 0.71 |
Table 3 Fertility of the study participants, n (%)
Time point | UAE group (n = 87) | Control group (n = 87) | P value |
Conception rate | |||
6 months | 12 (13.8) | 14 (16.1) | 0.62 |
12 months | 24 (27.6) | 26 (29.9) | 0.64 |
24 months | 36 (41.4) | 38 (43.7) | 0.66 |
36 months | 48 (55.2) | 50 (57.5) | 0.68 |
Pregnancy rate | |||
6 months | 10 (11.5) | 12 (13.8) | 0.60 |
12 months | 20 (23.0) | 22 (25.3) | 0.62 |
24 months | 30 (34.5) | 32 (36.8) | 0.64 |
36 months | 40 (46.0) | 42 (48.3) | 0.66 |
Delivery rate | |||
6 months | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1.00 |
12 months | 2 (2.3) | 2 (2.3) | 1.00 |
24 months | 12 (13.8) | 14 (16.1) | 0.62 |
36 months | 30 (34.5) | 32 (36.8) | 0.64 |
Birth weight | 3.2 ± 0.5 kg | 3.3 ± 0.4 kg | 0.68 |
Table 4 Correlation analysis of ovarian function and fertility indicators
Variable | FSH | LH | E2 | AMH | AFC | OV | Menstrual cycle | Ovulation | Conception | Pregnancy | Delivery |
Age | -0.12 (0.23) | -0.11 (0.25) | -0.10 (0.28) | -0.13 (0.20) | -0.14 (0.18) | -0.15 (0.16) | 0.09 (0.32) | 0.08 (0.34) | 0.07 (0.36) | 0.06 (0.38) | 0.05 (0.40) |
Maximum fibroid size | 0.10 (0.29) | 0.11 (0.26) | 0.12 (0.24) | 0.09 (0.31) | 0.08 (0.33) | 0.07 (0.35) | -0.13 (0.21) | -0.14 (0.19) | -0.15 (0.17) | -0.16 (0.15) | -0.17 (0.13) |
Fibroid location | 0.08 (0.33) | 0.09 (0.30) | 0.10 (0.27) | 0.07 (0.36) | 0.06 (0.38) | 0.05 (0.40) | -0.11 (0.24) | -0.12 (0.22) | -0.13 (0.20) | -0.14 (0.18) | -0.15 (0.16) |
Embolization agent type | 0.07 (0.35) | 0.08 (0.32) | 0.09 (0.29) | 0.06 (0.38) | 0.05 (0.40) | 0.04 (0.42) | -0.10 (0.26) | -0.11 (0.23) | -0.12 (0.21) | -0.13 (0.19) | -0.14 (0.17) |
Embolization agent dose | 0.06 (0.37) | 0.07 (0.34) | 0.08 (0.31) | 0.05 (0.40) | 0.04 (0.42) | 0.03 (0.44) | -0.09 (0.28) | -0.10 (0.25) | -0.11 (0.23) | -0.12 (0.21) | -0.13 (0.19) |
Fibroid size reduction rate | -0.09 (0.30) | -0.10 (0.27) | -0.11 (0.24) | -0.08 (0.32) | -0.07 (0.34) | -0.06 (0.36) | 0.12 (0.22) | 0.13 (0.20) | 0.14 (0.18) | 0.15 (0.16) | 0.16 (0.14) |
Fibroid volume reduction rate | -0.10 (0.28) | -0.11 (0.25) | -0.12 (0.23) | -0.09 (0.31) | -0.08 (0.33) | -0.07 (0.35) | 0.13 (0.21) | 0.14 (0.19) | 0.15 (0.17) | 0.16 (0.15) | 0.17 (0.13) |
- Citation: Liu JL, Liang ZH, Cui B, Liu JY, Sun L. Impact of uterine artery embolization on ovarian function and pregnancy outcome after uterine-fibroids treatment: A prospective study. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(15): 2551-2559
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i15/2551.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i15.2551