Liu JL, Liang ZH, Cui B, Liu JY, Sun L. Impact of uterine artery embolization on ovarian function and pregnancy outcome after uterine-fibroids treatment: A prospective study. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(15): 2551-2559 [PMID: 38817222 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i15.2551]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Li Sun, MD, Associate Chief Physician, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 980 (Bethune International Peace) Hospital of PLA Joint Logistics Support Forces, No. 398 Zhongshan West Road, Shijiazhuang 050082, Hebei Province, China. sunl0117@126.com
Research Domain of This Article
Medicine, General & Internal
Article-Type of This Article
Prospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. May 26, 2024; 12(15): 2551-2559 Published online May 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i15.2551
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study participants
Variable
UAE group (n = 87)
Control group (n = 87)
P value
Age (yr)
34.6 ± 4.2
34.8 ± 4.1
0.76
Body mass index (kg/m2)
24.3 ± 3.5
24.5 ± 3.4
0.68
Parity
0.9 ± 0.8
0.8 ± 0.7
0.54
Number of fibroids
2.4 ± 1.2
2.3 ± 1.1
0.59
Size of largest fibroid (cm)
5.6 ± 1.8
5.5 ± 1.7
0.71
Location of fibroids, n (%)
0.82
Submucosal
12 (13.8)
14 (16.1)
Intramural
48 (55.2)
46 (52.9)
Subserosal
27 (31.0)
27 (31.0)
Type of fibroids, n (%)
0.77
Pedunculated
9 (10.3)
8 (9.2)
Sessile
78 (89.7)
79 (90.8)
Table 2 Ovarian function and fertility of the study participants (mean ± SD)
Variable
UAE group (n = 87)
Control group (n = 87)
P value
FSH (IU/L)
Baseline
6.4 ± 1.2
6.5 ± 1.1
0.69
6 months
6.6 ± 1.3
6.7 ± 1.2
0.72
12 months
6.7 ± 1.4
6.8 ± 1.3
0.75
24 months
6.9 ± 1.5
7.0 ± 1.4
0.78
36 months
7.1 ± 1.6
7.2 ± 1.5
0.81
Change from baseline to 36 months
0.7 ± 0.8
0.7 ± 0.7
0.83
LH (IU/L)
Baseline
4.3 ± 1.1
4.4 ± 1.0
0.66
6 months
4.5 ± 1.2
4.6 ± 1.1
0.68
12 months
4.6 ± 1.3
4.7 ± 1.2
0.71
24 months
4.8 ± 1.4
4.9 ± 1.3
0.74
36 months
5.0 ± 1.5
5.1 ± 1.4
0.77
Change from baseline to 36 months
0.7 ± 0.9
0.7 ± 0.8
0.79
E2 (pg/mL)
Baseline
68.2 ± 15.4
69.3 ± 14.6
0.62
6 months
70.4 ± 16.2
71.5 ± 15.4
0.64
12 months
72.6 ± 17.0
73.7 ± 16.2
0.66
24 months
74.8 ± 17.8
75.9 ± 17.0
0.68
36 months
77.0 ± 18.6
78.1 ± 17.8
0.70
Change from baseline to 36 months
8.8 ± 10.2
8.8 ± 9.6
0.72
AMH (ng/mL)
Baseline
3.2 ± 1.4
3.3 ± 1.3
0.67
6 months
3.1 ± 1.3
3.2 ± 1.2
0.69
12 months
3.0 ± 1.2
3.1 ± 1.1
0.71
24 months
2.9 ± 1.1
3.0 ± 1.0
0.73
36 months
2.8 ± 1.0
2.9 ± 0.9
0.75
Change from baseline to 36 months
-0.4 ± 0.6
-0.4 ± 0.5
0.77
AFC
Baseline
12.4 ± 3.2
12.6 ± 3.1
0.65
6 months
12.2 ± 3.1
12.4 ± 3.0
0.67
12 months
12.0 ± 3.0
12.2 ± 2.9
0.69
24 months
11.8 ± 2.9
12.0 ± 2.8
0.71
36 months
11.6 ± 2.8
11.8 ± 2.7
0.73
Change from baseline to 36 months
-0.8 ± 1.2
-0.8 ± 1.1
0.75
OV (mL)
Baseline
8.6 ± 2.1
8.8 ± 2.0
0.63
6 months
8.4 ± 2.0
8.6 ± 1.9
0.65
12 months
8.2 ± 1.9
8.4 ± 1.8
0.67
24 months
8.0 ± 1.8
8.2 ± 1.7
0.69
36 months
7.8 ± 1.7
8.0 ± 1.6
0.71
Table 3 Fertility of the study participants, n (%)
Time point
UAE group (n = 87)
Control group (n = 87)
P value
Conception rate
6 months
12 (13.8)
14 (16.1)
0.62
12 months
24 (27.6)
26 (29.9)
0.64
24 months
36 (41.4)
38 (43.7)
0.66
36 months
48 (55.2)
50 (57.5)
0.68
Pregnancy rate
6 months
10 (11.5)
12 (13.8)
0.60
12 months
20 (23.0)
22 (25.3)
0.62
24 months
30 (34.5)
32 (36.8)
0.64
36 months
40 (46.0)
42 (48.3)
0.66
Delivery rate
6 months
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
1.00
12 months
2 (2.3)
2 (2.3)
1.00
24 months
12 (13.8)
14 (16.1)
0.62
36 months
30 (34.5)
32 (36.8)
0.64
Birth weight
3.2 ± 0.5 kg
3.3 ± 0.4 kg
0.68
Table 4 Correlation analysis of ovarian function and fertility indicators
Variable
FSH
LH
E2
AMH
AFC
OV
Menstrual cycle
Ovulation
Conception
Pregnancy
Delivery
Age
-0.12 (0.23)
-0.11 (0.25)
-0.10 (0.28)
-0.13 (0.20)
-0.14 (0.18)
-0.15 (0.16)
0.09 (0.32)
0.08 (0.34)
0.07 (0.36)
0.06 (0.38)
0.05 (0.40)
Maximum fibroid size
0.10 (0.29)
0.11 (0.26)
0.12 (0.24)
0.09 (0.31)
0.08 (0.33)
0.07 (0.35)
-0.13 (0.21)
-0.14 (0.19)
-0.15 (0.17)
-0.16 (0.15)
-0.17 (0.13)
Fibroid location
0.08 (0.33)
0.09 (0.30)
0.10 (0.27)
0.07 (0.36)
0.06 (0.38)
0.05 (0.40)
-0.11 (0.24)
-0.12 (0.22)
-0.13 (0.20)
-0.14 (0.18)
-0.15 (0.16)
Embolization agent type
0.07 (0.35)
0.08 (0.32)
0.09 (0.29)
0.06 (0.38)
0.05 (0.40)
0.04 (0.42)
-0.10 (0.26)
-0.11 (0.23)
-0.12 (0.21)
-0.13 (0.19)
-0.14 (0.17)
Embolization agent dose
0.06 (0.37)
0.07 (0.34)
0.08 (0.31)
0.05 (0.40)
0.04 (0.42)
0.03 (0.44)
-0.09 (0.28)
-0.10 (0.25)
-0.11 (0.23)
-0.12 (0.21)
-0.13 (0.19)
Fibroid size reduction rate
-0.09 (0.30)
-0.10 (0.27)
-0.11 (0.24)
-0.08 (0.32)
-0.07 (0.34)
-0.06 (0.36)
0.12 (0.22)
0.13 (0.20)
0.14 (0.18)
0.15 (0.16)
0.16 (0.14)
Fibroid volume reduction rate
-0.10 (0.28)
-0.11 (0.25)
-0.12 (0.23)
-0.09 (0.31)
-0.08 (0.33)
-0.07 (0.35)
0.13 (0.21)
0.14 (0.19)
0.15 (0.17)
0.16 (0.15)
0.17 (0.13)
Citation: Liu JL, Liang ZH, Cui B, Liu JY, Sun L. Impact of uterine artery embolization on ovarian function and pregnancy outcome after uterine-fibroids treatment: A prospective study. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(15): 2551-2559