Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 6, 2024; 12(1): 95-106
Published online Jan 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i1.95
Published online Jan 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i1.95
Ref. | Country | Study design | Sample size in ESD group | Sample size in TES group | Study participants details | Surgeons for ESD | Surgeons for TES | Mean age (yr) | Risk of bias |
Bisogni et al[22], 2020 | Italy | Retrospective | 13 | 36 | Patients with superficial rectal lesions such as adenomas with negative lifting sign, T1 carcinoma with indication for endoscopic resection and subepithelial colorectal tumour | Three over ten years’ experience endoscopists | Three experienced surgeons performed all the TES procedures | ESD = 74.92; TES = 69.17 | High |
Jin et al[23], 2023 | China | Retrospective | 14 | 49 | Patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumours ≤ 2 cm | Experienced endoscopist team, who had completed over 5000 cases for colonoscopy training and completed more than 300 cases for ESD | Experienced surgeon who had completed over 300 cases for TES training | ESD = 52.9; TES = 51.1 | Moderate |
Jung et al[19], 2018 | Korea | Retrospective | 40 | 16 | Patients with epithelial rectal tumour | One experienced endoscopist | One experienced surgeon | ESD = 67.4; TES = 68.4 | Moderate |
Kawaguti et al[21], 2014 | Brazil | Retrospective | 11 | 13 | Patients with early-stage rectal cancer | NR | NR | ESD = 62.3; TES =61.5 | High |
Kim et al[24], 2023 | United States | Retrospective | 101 | 103 | Patients with early-stage rectal cancer | NR | NR | ESD = 63; TES = 62 | Moderate |
Kimura et al[25], 2021 | Brazil | Retrospective | 71 | 27 | Consecutive patients undergoing either ESD or TES | Endoscopist who performed all the ESD procedures had previous training in this technique and had performed more than 20 cases/yr | Two colorectal surgeons performed TEM and both had previous training in this method, had performed more than 20 cases per year | ESD = 65.5; TES = 64.9 | Moderate |
Mao et al[18], 2017 | China | Retrospective | 31 | 26 | Patients with early-stage rectal tumour | Senior colorectal surgeons and assistants with expertise in endoscopic operations | Experienced colorectal surgeons | ESD = 52.1; TES =54.8 | High |
Mittal et al[16], 2018 | India | Retrospective | 31 | 19 | Patients with rectal polyps | NR | NR | NR | High |
Park et al[20], 2012 | Korea | Retrospective | 30 | 33 | Patients with nonpolypoid high-grade dysplasia or cancer invading the submucosa | One experienced endoscopist | Experienced surgeons | ESD = 58.6; TES = 59.5 | Low |
Park et al[26], 2021 | Korea | Retrospective | 226 | 59 | Patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumours | Four experienced endoscopist | One surgeon | ESD = 48.92; TES = 50.85 | Low |
Tajika et al[17], 2016 | India | Retrospective | 48 | 28 | Patients with lower rectal tumour | NR | NR | NR | High |
- Citation: Huang LW, Zhong Y. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs transanal endoscopic surgery for rectal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(1): 95-106
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i1/95.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i1.95