Clinical value of precise rehabilitation nursing in management of cerebral infarction

Table 1 Comparison of clinical symptom relief time (mean ± SD, d)

Group	n	Time of hospital stay	Time of disturbance of consciousness	Time of central hyperthermia	Time of paralysis relief
Routine intervention group	61	9.38 ± 0.97	8.07 ± 0.84	5.88 ± 0.62	6.05 ± 0.62
Model intervention group	63	7.24 ± 0.75	5.26 ± 0.54	3.49 ± 0.37	3.67 ± 0.39
t value		13.770	22.230	26.160	25.670
P value		0.001	0.001	0.001	0.001

Table 2 Comparison of Hamilton Anxiety Scale and Hamilton Depression Scale scores (mean ± SD, d)

Group	n	HAMA		HAMD
		Before the intervention	After the intervention	Before the intervention	After the intervention
Routine intervention group	61	14.86 ± 1.51	8.57 ± 0.89	15.87 ± 1.62	10.27 ± 1.05
Model intervention group	63	14.89 ± 1.48	6.23 ± 0.64	15.84 ± 1.68	8.05 ± 0.83
t value		0.112	16.850	0.101	13.080
P value		0.911	0.001	0.920	0.001

HAMA: Hamilton Anxiety Scale; HAMD: Hamilton Depression Scale.

Table 3 Comparison of disease knowledge and safety and quality

Group	n	Disease knowledge mastery [n (%)]				Safety and quality (mean ± SD, point)
		Complete control	Master	Failing to master	Mastery rate of disease knowledge	Before the intervention	After the intervention
Routine intervention group	61	28	23	10	51 (83.61)	8.49 ± 0.83	14.52 ± 1.46
Model intervention group	63	39	21	3	60 (95.24)	8.46 ± 0.87	17.69 ± 1.83
χ2/t value					4.468	0.196	10.640
P value					0.035	0.845	0.001

Table 4 Statistical data of nursing satisfaction [n (%)]

Group	n	Very satisfied	Satisfied	Not satisfied	Total satisfaction
Routine intervention group	61	33	19	9	52 (85.25)
Model intervention group	63	44	17	2	61 (96.83)
χ2					5.140
P value					0.023

Table 5 Statistical data of complications [n (%)]

Group	n	In a coma	Lung infection	Dyspnea	Stress induced ulcer	Total complication rate
Routine intervention group	61	2	5	1	2	10 (16.39)
Model intervention group	63	1	1	0	1	3 (4.76)
χ2						4.468
P value						0.035