Influence of standardized nursing intervention combined with mindfulness stress reduction training on the curative effect in patients with acute pancreatitis

Table 1 Comparison of patients’ general data, n, (%)

General data	Control group (n = 40)	Observation group (n = 40)	χ2/t	P value
Sex, male	23 (57.5)	24 (60.0)	0.043	0.905
Female	17 (42.5)	16 (40.0)
Age (yr, mean ± SD)	33.52 ± 6.35	32.95 ± 6.20	0.073	0.830
Course of disease (h, mean ± SD)	39.25 ± 5.40	39.45 ± 5.34	0.613	0.503
BMI (kg/m2, mean ± SD)	22.64 ± 2.16	22.71 ± 2.11	0.235	0.416
Mild acute pancreatitis	32 (80.0)	34 (85.0)	0.423	0.104
Serve acute pancreatitis	8 (20.0)	6 (15.0)
Marital status			0.240	0.632
Married	31 (77.5)	33 (82.5)
Spinsterhood, divorced, widowed	9 (22.5)	7 (17.5)
Education level			1.231	0.522
Above high school	33 (82.5)	32 (80.0)
High school and below	7 (17.5)	8 (20.0)

Table 2 Comparison of the complication incidence rate, n (%)

Group	n	Sedimentary pneumonia	Pressure sores	Total occurrence
Control	40	5 (12.5)	4 (10.00)	22.50
Observation	40	1a (2.5)	1a (2.5)	5.00a
t		1.535	1.810	2.304
P		0.001	0.003	0.001

^aIndicates the comparison to control group, P < 0.05.

Table 3 Comparison of anxiety and depression (mean ± SD, scores)

Group	n	Self-Rating Anxiety Scale scores	Self-Rating Depression Scale scores
Control	40	50.15 ± 5.23	51.27 ± 5.30
Observation	40	45.14 ± 4.30a	45.76 ± 4.24a
t		8.652	7.542
P		0.006	0.003

^aIndicates the comparison to control group, P < 0.05.

Table 4 Comparison of life quality scores (mean ± SD, scores)

Group	n	Psychological field	Physiological field	Environmental field	Social relations
Control	40	14.20 ± 1.23	12.15 ± 1.30	13.05 ± 1.14	14.15 ± 1.30
Observation	40	16.24 ± 1.40a	15.16 ± 1.34a	16.32 ± 1.18a	18.25 ± 1.26a
t		10.253	9.830	6.424	3.896
P value		0.026	0.004	0.005	0.012

^aIndicates the comparison to control group, P < 0.05.