Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 26, 2023; 11(33): 7994-8002
Published online Nov 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i33.7994
Published online Nov 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i33.7994
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of patients with primary breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Variable | Value |
No. of patients | 32 |
Age (yr) | mean ± SD: 56.6 ± 12.4; Range: 32-78 |
Sex | Female: 28 (87.5%); Male: 4 (12.5%) |
Tumor size (cm) | mean ± SD: 4.2 ± 2.1; Range: 1.5-9 |
Treatment modalities | Chemotherapy alone: 8 (25%); Chemotherapy + rituximab: 16 (50%); Chemotherapy + radiotherapy: 6 (18.8%); Chemotherapy + rituximab + radiotherapy: 2 (6.3%) |
Ki-67 expression level (%) | Mean ± SD: 68.4 ± 21.6; Range: 20-95 |
Follow-up duration (mo) | Median: 24; Range: 6-60 |
Survival status | Dead: 8 (25%); Alive with disease: 6 (18.8%); Alive without disease: 18 (56.3%) |
Table 2 Conventional ultrasound features of primary breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma lesions
Feature | PB-DLBCL (n = 32), n (%) | Benign (n = 32), n (%) | P value | AUC |
Shape | < 0.001 | 0.799 | ||
Round/oval | 5 (15.6) | 24 (75) | ||
Irregular | 27 (84.4) | 8 (25) | ||
Margin | < 0.001 | 0.750 | ||
Circumscribed | 8 (25) | 28 (87.5) | ||
Microlobulated/spiculated/indistinct/angular | 24 (75) | 4 (12.5) | ||
Orientation | 0.003 | 0.637 | ||
Parallel | 21 (65.6) | 30 (93.8) | ||
Non-parallel | 11 (34.4) | 2 (6.3) | ||
Echo | < 0.001 | 0.688 | ||
Anechoic/hyperechoic/isoechoic | 4 (12.5) | 16 (50) | ||
Hypoechoic | 28 (87.5) | 16 (50) | ||
Posterior acoustic features | < 0.001 | 0.812 | ||
None/shadowing/combined pattern | 11 (34.4) | 26 (81.3) | ||
Enhancement | 21 (65.6) | 6 (18.8) | ||
Calcification | > 0.05 | NA | ||
Present | 2 (6.3) | 4 (12.5) | ||
Absent | 30 (93.8) | 28 (87.5) | ||
Vascularity | < 0.001 | 0.612 | ||
Avascular | 10 (31.3) | 18 (56.3) | ||
Hypovascular | 12 (37.5) | 14 (43.8) | ||
Hypervascular | 10 (31.3) | 0 (0) |
Table 3 Shear wave elastography features of primary breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma lesions
Feature | PB-DLBCL (n = 32) | Benign (n = 32) | P value | AUC |
mean ± SD/range | mean ± SD/range | |||
Mean elasticity value (kPa) | 113.4 ± 46.9/(42-212) | 27.8 ± 16.4/(9-68) | < 0.001 | 0.969 |
Standard deviation (kPa) | 29.6 ± 14/(11-64) | 11 ± 6/(4-28) | < 0.001 | 0.875 |
Minimum elasticity value (kPa) | 51 ± 21/(19-97) | 13 ± 7/(5-34) | < 0.001 | 0.906 |
Maximum elasticity value (kPa) | 175 ± 67/(82-321) | 46 ± 23/(18-98) | < 0.001 | 0.938 |
Ratio of lesion to fat | 7.1 ± 3.2/(2.6-14.5) | 1.8 ± 0.9/(0.7-4.2) | < 0.001 | 0.812 |
Table 4 Mean elasticity value and Ki-67 expression level of primary breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma lesions
Ki-67 expression level (%) | Mean elasticity value (kPa) |
20 | 42 |
25 | 46 |
30 | 51 |
35 | 55 |
40 | 59 |
45 | 64 |
50 | 68 |
55 | 73 |
60 | 78 |
65 | 83 |
70 | 88 |
75 | 93 |
80 | 98 |
85 | 103 |
90 | 108 |
95 | 113 |
Table 5 Overall survival and progression-free survival of primary breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients according to the mean elasticity value of primary breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma lesions
Time (mo) | High-stiffness group OS (%) | High-stiffness group PFS (%) | Low-stiffness group OS (%) | Low-stiffness group PFS (%) |
0 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
6 | 87.5 | 75 | 93.8 | 87.5 |
12 | 75 | 62.5 | 87.5 | 81.3 |
18 | 62.5 | 50 | 81.3 | 75 |
24 | 50 | 37.5 | 75 | 68.8 |
30 | 37.5 | 25 | 68.8 | 62.5 |
36 | 25 | 12.5 | 62.5 | 56.3 |
42 | 12.5 | 0 | 56.3 | 50 |
48 | 0 | NA | 50 | 43.8 |
54 | NA | NA | 43.8 | NA |
60 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
- Citation: Zhang XD, Zhang K. Comparative analysis of conventional ultrasound and shear wave elastography features in primary breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(33): 7994-8002
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i33/7994.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i33.7994