Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 16, 2023; 11(32): 7795-7805
Published online Nov 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i32.7795
Published online Nov 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i32.7795
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the two groups, n (%)
Variable | LG group (n = 38) | OG group (n = 38) | P value |
Age (yr) | 59.3 ± 9.8 | 60.5 ± 10.2 | 0.59 |
Sex-male | 24 (63.2) | 26 (68.4) | 0.71 |
Sex-female | 14 (36.8) | 12 (31.6) | |
BMI (kg/m)2 | 23.4 ± 3.2 | 22.9 ± 2.9 | 0.48 |
ECOG PS-0 | 28 (73.7) | 29 (76.3) | 0.86 |
ECOG PS-1 | 10 (26.3) | 9 (23.7) | |
Comorbidities-yes | 14 (36.8) | 16 (42.1) | 0.67 |
Comorbidities-no | 24 (63.2) | 22 (57.9) | |
Tumor location-upper third | 10 (26.3) | 12 (31.6) | 0.75 |
Tumor location-middle third | 14 (36.8) | 13 (34.2) | |
Tumor location-lower third | 14 (36.8) | 13 (34.2) | |
Tumor size (cm) | 5.2 ± 1.8 | 5.4 ± 2.1 | 0.66 |
Clinical stage1-II | 14 (36.8) | 15 (39.5) | 0.82 |
Clinical stage1-III | 24 (63.2) | ||
Pathological response-complete2 | 4 (10.5) | 3 (7.9) | 0.69 |
Pathological response-partial2 | 18 (47.4) | 19 (50.0) | |
Pathological response-stable2 | 12 (31.6) | 11 (28.9) | |
Pathological response-progressive2 | 4 (10.5) | 5 (13.2) | |
Type of gastrectomy-total2 | 20 (52.6) | 21 (55.3) | 0.88 |
Type of gastrectomy-subtotal2 | 18 (47.4) | 17 (44.7) |
Table 2 Perioperative outcomes of the two groups
Variable | LG group (n = 38) | OG group (n = 38) | P value |
Operation time (min) | 210 ± 45 | 220 ± 50 | 0.28 |
Blood loss (mL) | 100 ± 50 | 300 ± 100 | < 0.001 |
R0 resection rate (%) | 36 (94.7) | 35 (92.1) | 0.64 |
Number of harvested lymph nodes1 | 22 ± 8 | 23 ± 9 | 0.57 |
Proximal margin (cm)2 | 3.5 ± 1.2 | 3.6 ± 1.3 | 0.72 |
Distal margin (cm)3 | 4.2 ± 1.4 | 4.3 ± 1.5 | 0.79 |
Hospital stay (days)4 | 10 ± 3 | 15 ± 4 | < 0.001 |
Anastomotic leakage-Grade I-IIA5 (%) | 2 (5.3) | 3 (7.9) | 0.67 |
Anastomotic leakage-Grade IIB-IVB5 (%) | 0 | 1 (2.6) | |
Intra-abdominal abscess-Grade I-IIA5 (%) | 1 (2.6) | 2 (5.3) | 0.54 |
Intra-abdominal abscess-Grade IIB-IVB5 (%) | 0 | 1 (2.6) | |
Wound dehiscence-Grade I-IIA5 (%) | 1 (2.6) | 2 (5.3) | 0.73 |
Wound dehiscence-Grade IIB-IVB5 | 0 | 0 | |
Surgical site infection-Grade I-IIA5 (%) | 2 (5.3) | 8 (21.1) | 0.04 |
Surgical site infection-Grade IIB-IVB5 | 0 | 0 | |
Other complications-Grade I-IIA5 (%) | 4 (10.5) | 5 (13.2) | 0.47 |
Other complications-Grade IIB-IVB5 | 0 | 1 (2.6) |
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analyses of survival outcomes
Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | |
Overall survival | ||||
Group | ||||
LG | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
OG | 1.28 (0.67-2.45) | 0.46 | 1.24 (0.64-2.40) | 0.52 |
Age | ||||
≤ 60 | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
> 60 | 1.35 (0.72-2.54) | 0.35 | 1.32 (0.69-2.51) | 0.40 |
Sex | ||||
Male | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
Female | 0.86 (0.45-1.64) | 0.65 | 0.84 (0.43-1.61) | 0.59 |
BMI | ||||
≤ 25 | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
> 25 | 1.12 (0.58-2.16) | 0.74 | 1.09 (0.56-2.13) | 0.79 |
Tumor location | ||||
Upper third | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
Middle third | 0.97 (0.47-2.01) | 0.94 | 0.95 (0.45-1.98) | 0.89 |
Lower third | 0.92 (0.44-1.91) | 0.82 | 0.89 (0.42-1.86) | 0.75 |
Tumor size | ||||
≤ 5 cm | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
> 5 cm | 1.41 (0.75-2.65) | 0.28 | 1.38 (0.72-2.62) | 0.32 |
Pathological stage1 | ||||
II | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
III | 2.15 (1.12-4.13) | 0.02 | 2.12 (1.09-4.10) | 0.03 |
Pathological response2 | ||||
Complete | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
Partial | 1.22 (0.38-3.94) | 0.74 | 1.18 (0.36-3.86) | 0.79 |
Stable | 1.45 (0.45-4.66) | 0.54 | 1.41 (0.43-4.59) | 0.57 |
Progressive | 2.67 (0.81-8.80) | 0.11 | 2.61 (0.78-8.68) | 0.12 |
Disease-free survival | ||||
Group | ||||
LG | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
OG | 1.19 (0.64-2.21) | 0.58 | 1.16 (0.62-2.17) | 0.64 |
Age | ||||
≤ 60 | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
> 60 | 1.25 (0.68-2.30) | 0.47 | 1.23 (0.66-2.27) | 0.51 |
Sex | ||||
Male | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
Female | 0.91 (0.49-1.70) | 0.77 | 0.89 (0.47-1.66) | 0.71 |
BMI | ||||
≤ 25 | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
> 25 | 1.08 (0.57-2.05) | 0.81 | 1.05 (0.54-2.01) | 0.88 |
Tumor location | ||||
Upper third | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
Middle third | 0.99 (0.49-2.02) | 0.98 | 0.97 (0.47-1.99) | 0.93 |
Lower third | 0.94 (0.46-1.93) | 0.87 | 0.91 (0.44-1.88) | 0.80 |
Tumor size | ||||
≤ 5 cm | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
> 5 cm | 1.32 (0.72-2.42) | 0.37 | 1.29 (0.69-2.38) | 0.42 |
Pathological stage | ||||
II | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
III | 2.03 (1.08-3.81) | 0.03 | 2.01 (1.06-3.78) | 0.03 |
Pathological response | ||||
Complete | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
Partial | 1.18 (0.38-3.67) | 0.78 | 1.15 (0.36-3.59) | 0.82 |
Stable | 1.36 (0.43-4.30) | 0.60 | 1.32 (0.41-4.23) | 0.64 |
Progressive | 2.49 (0.77-8.07 | 0.13 | 2.43 (0.74-7.97) | 0.14 |
Table 4 Quality of life scores of the two groups
Period | Variable | LG group (n = 38) | OG group (n = 38) | P value |
Baseline | Physical functioning1 | 83 ± 12 | 82 ± 13 | 0.79 |
Role Functioning1 | 80 ± 15 | 79 ± 16 | 0.83 | |
Emotional functioning1 | 76 ± 14 | 75 ± 15 | 0.88 | |
Cognitive functioning1 | 78 ± 13 | 77 ± 14 | 0.81 | |
Social functioning1 | 79 ± 16 | 78 ± 17 | 0.86 | |
Before surgery | Physical functioning1 | 71 ± 14 | 70 ± 15 | 0.79 |
Role functioning1 | 68 ± 17 | 67 ± 18 | 0.83 | |
Emotional functioning1 | 64 ± 16 | 63 ± 17 | 0.88 | |
Cognitive functioning1 | 66 ± 15 | 65 ± 16 | 0.81 | |
Social functioning1 | 67 ± 18 | 66 ± 19 | 0.86 | |
Six mo after surgery | Physical functioning1 | 81 ± 13 | 72 ± 16 | 0.01 |
Role functioning1 | 78 ± 16 | 69 ± 19 | 0.02 | |
Emotional functioning1 | 74 ± 15 | 67 ± 18 | 0.07 | |
Cognitive functioning1 | 76 ± 14 | 71 ± 16 | 0.11 | |
Social functioning1 | 77 ± 17 | 71 ± 19 | 0.12 |
- Citation: Yu CD, Zhang K. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(32): 7795-7805
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i32/7795.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i32.7795