Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 6, 2023; 11(31): 7562-7569
Published online Nov 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i31.7562
Published online Nov 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i31.7562
Patient No. | Sex | Age | BMI (kg/ | Location | Site | Onset (mo) | Status | Past history | Defect size (cm2) | Muscle flap size (cm2) | FC flap size (cm2) | Complication | Follow-up time (mo) |
1 | M | 50 | 20 | Ischial sore | Lt. | 3 | Paraplegia | None | 6 × 4 | 5 × 8 | 5 × 12 | None | 8 |
2 | M | 42 | 25.9 | Trochanteric sore | Rt. | Unknown | Paraplegia | C1VD | 12 × 13 | 15 × 10 | 6 × 15 | Wound dehiscence | 12.5 |
3 | M | 48 | 27.6 | Ischial sore | Rt. | 1 | Paraplegia | DM | 4 × 4 | 12 × 8 | 8 × 10 | Seroma | 15 |
4 | M | 52 | 18.8 | Ischial sore | Rt. | 2 | Paraplegia | None | 4 × 5 | 12 × 5 | 4 × 12 | None | 9 |
5 | M | 58 | 22.5 | Ischial sore | Rt. | 84 | Paraplegia | None | 7 × 3 | 10 × 8 | 5 × 12 | None | 10 |
6 | M | 64 | 19.5 | Ischial sore | Lt. | 1 | Paraplegia | None | 6 × 8 | 5 × 6 | 4 × 10 | None | 8 |
7 | M | 72 | 23.8 | Ischial sore | Lt. | 2 | Paraplegia | HTN, DM | 5 × 6 | 6 × 8 | 5 × 10 | None | 9 |
8 | M | 68 | 21.2 | Trochanteric sore | Lt. | 12 | Paraplegia | HTNDM | 4 × 5 | 6 × 7 | 5 × 12 | None | 18 |
9 | F | 65 | 23.6 | Ischial sore | Rt. | 1 | Paraplegia | HTN | 3 × 5 | 8 × 10 | 6 × 10 | None | 10 |
10 | F | 70 | 27.3 | Ischial sore | Rt. | 24 | Quadriplegia | None | 6 × 7 | 6 × 8 | 5 × 13 | None | 8 |
11 | M | 63 | 22.4 | Ischial sore | Lt. | 3 | Paraplegia | HTNDM | 7 × 8 | 5 × 8 | 5 × 12 | None | 10 |
12 | F | 71 | 25.7 | Ischial sore | Lt. | 2 | Paraplegia | HTNDM | 5 × 5 | 6 × 8 | 4 × 10 | None | 12 |
13 | M | 60 | 27.0 | Trochanteric sore | Rt. | 3 | Quadriplegia | None | 4 × 4 | 5 × 8 | 5 × 10 | None | 9 |
14 | M | 62 | 23.0 | Ischial sore | Rt. | 2 | Paraplegia | DM | 4 × 5 | 7 × 10 | 5 × 13 | None | 10 |
15 | M | 64 | 25.5 | Ischial sore | Lt. | 1 | Quadriplegia | HTNDM | 5 × 6 | 6 × 8 | 5 × 12 | None | 9 |
Patient No. | 3 wk follow-up postoperative flap thickness (mm) | 6 mo follow-up postoperative flap thickness (mm, %) | Difference (mm, %) |
1 | 34.05 | 31.01 (91.7) | 3.04 (-8.3) |
2 | 35.37 | 30.17 (85.3) | 5.20 (-14.7) |
3 | 48.37 | 45.08 (93.2) | 3.29 (-6.8) |
4 | 19.02 | 17.58 (92.4) | 1.44 (-7.6) |
5 | 41.98 | 37.40 (89.1) | 4.58 (-10.9) |
6 | 27.77 | 24.56 (88.4) | 3.21 (-11.6) |
7 | 37.29 | 35.58 (95.4) | 1.71 (-4.6) |
8 | 24.03 | 20.06 (83.4) | 3.97 (-16.6) |
9 | 28.95 | 25.53 (88.1) | 3.42 (-11.9) |
10 | 40.05 | 36.43 (90.9) | 4.62 (-9.1) |
11 | 43.72 | 37.33 (85.3) | 6.39 (-14.7) |
12 | 38.55 | 33.01 (85.6) | 5.54 (-14.4) |
13 | 19.87 | 17.46 (87.8) | 2.41 (-12.2) |
14 | 25.64 | 23.12 (90.1) | 2.52 (-9.9) |
15 | 28.13 | 24.77 (88.0) | 3.36 (-12.0) |
Average | 32.85 ± 8.89 | 29.27 ± 8.22 (88.98) | 3.58 (-11.02) |
- Citation: Kim EC, Park JD, Wee SY, Kim SY. Measurement of combined flap thickness for reconstruction of decubitus ulcer using computed tomography. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(31): 7562-7569
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i31/7562.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i31.7562