Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 6, 2023; 11(31): 7553-7561
Published online Nov 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i31.7553
Published online Nov 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i31.7553
Table 1 Ultrasonographic characteristics of benign and malignant tumors
Echo | Capsule | Blood flow resistance index | Form | Blood flow signal display rate | ||||
Rules | Irregularity | Yes | No | Clear | Not clear | |||
Benign tumor | 55 | 5 | 46 | 14 | 0.79 ± 0.05 | 54 | 6 | 15 (25%) |
Malignant tumor | 8 | 42 | 12 | 38 | 0.44 ± 0.49 | 5 | 45 | 50 (100%) |
χ2/t | 63.809 | 30.350 | 24.010 | 70.189 | 63.462 | |||
P value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Table 2 Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient value (mm2/s) and time-signal intensity curve image features [n (%)] between benign and malignant tumors
Solid part ADC value | ADC value of cystic part | TIC image features | |||
I type | II type | III type | |||
Benign tumor | 1789.74 ± 122.53 | 2799.33 ± 89.88 | 46 (76.67) | 14 (23.33) | 0 (0.00) |
Malignant tumor | 867.67 ± 15.87 | 2260.03 ± 91.75 | 0 (0.00) | 4 (0.08) | 46 (92.00) |
χ2/t | 33.353 | 20.615 | 65.885 | 4.685 | 94.875 |
P value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.030 | 0.000 |
Table 3 Serum tumor markers in patients with benign and malignant tumors
n | CA125 (U/mL) | HE4 (pmol/L) | |
Benign tumor | 60 | 22.67 ± 4.57 | 75.33 ± 9.84 |
Malignant tumor | 50 | 397.60 ± 180.02 | 298.70 ± 40.66 |
t | -11.462 | -28.982 | |
P value | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Table 4 Comparison of diagnostic results and pathological results of three examination methods for ovarian tumors
n | US | MRI | Tumor marker | Joint detection method | |||||
Benign | Malignant | Benign | Malignant | Benign | Malignant | Benign | Malignant | ||
Benign tumor | 60 | 48 | 12 | 51 | 9 | 49 | 11 | 59 | 1 |
Malignant tumor | 50 | 12 | 38 | 8 | 42 | 4 | 46 | 0 | 50 |
Total | 110 | 60 | 50 | 59 | 51 | 53 | 57 | 59 | 51 |
Table 5 Comparison of diagnostic efficiency of different methods
Method | Diagnostic accuracy (%) | Diagnostic sensitivity (%) | Diagnostic specificity (%) |
US | 78.18 (86/110) | 80.00 (48/60) | 76.00 (38/50) |
MRI | 84.55 (93/110) | 85.00 (51/60) | 84.00 (42/50) |
Tumor marker | 86.36 (95/110) | 81.67 (49/60) | 92.00 (46/50) |
Joint detection method | 99.09 (109/110) | 98.33 (59/60) | 100.00 (50/50) |
χ2 | 22.705 | 16.590 | 30.303 |
P value | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Yang Q, Zhang H, Ma PQ, Peng B, Yin GT, Zhang NN, Wang HB. Value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging combined with tumor markers in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(31): 7553-7561
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i31/7553.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i31.7553