Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 6, 2023; 11(28): 6857-6863
Published online Oct 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i28.6857
Table 1 Nerve conduction studies for both lower extremities
Nerve stimulatedStimulation siteRecording siteOnset latency (ms)
Amplitude motor (mV), sensory (μV)
Velocity (m/s)
Right
Left
Right
Left
Right
Left
Motor studies
TibiaAnkleAHB4.34.713.614.2
Popliteal fossa12.713.68.99.44744
PeronealAnkleEDB4.95.23.53.4
Fibular head11.311.72.92.94645
Popliteal fossa13.413.82.42.74947
PeronealFibular headTA3.43.24.24.3
Popliteal fossa4.64.54.03.95450
PeronealFibular headPL2.62.73.116.5
Popliteal fossa6.34.41.115.922147
Sensory studies
SuralCalfPosterior ankle3.43.514.715.64240
Superficial peronealLateral calfAnkle3.33.415.716.14241
Table 2 Electromyography for both lower extremities
MuscleSpontaneous activity
Voluntary motor unit action potentials
Insertional activity
Fibrillation potentials
Positive sharp waves
Amplitude
Duration
Polyphasia
Recruitment
Interference pattern
Right
Vastus lateralisNL00NLNLNLNLFull
Tibialis anteriorNL00NLNLNLNLFull
Peroneus longusIncreased2+2+NLNLNLDiscreteIncomplete
Peroneus brevisIncreased2+2+NLNLNLDiscreteIncomplete
GastrocnemiusNL00NLNLNLNLFull
Left
Tibialis anteriorNL00NLNLNLNLFull
Peroneus longusNL00NLNLNLNLFull
Peroneus brevisNL00NLNLNLNLFull
Table 3 Reported cases of neuropathy of the common peroneal nerve due to compression by the fabella
Ref.
Age
Gender
Symptom
Tinel sign
Fabella size
NCV
EMG
Treatment
Outcome
This case46FemaleInverted foot with evertors atrophy+25 mm × 19 mm × 27 mmConduction blockAD and R-MUAP in PL, PBSurgeryPartially resolved
Mangieri[7]46FemaleSensory impairment+22 mm × 14 mmFocal slowingNormalSurgeryCompletely resolved
Takebe and Hirohata[6]49MaleDrop foot with sensory impairment+9 mm × 7 mm × 6 mmFocal slowingAD and R-MUAP in TA, PLSurgerySlight functional disturbance
34MaleDrop foot with sensory impairment+11 mm × 9 mm × 7 mmFocal slowingAD and R-MUAP in TA, PLSurgeryCompletely resolved
36MaleDrop foot with sensory impairment-10 mm × 10 mm × 8 mmFocal slowingAD, R-MUAP and polyphasia in TA, PLSurgeryCompletely resolved
53MaleDrop foot with sensory-11 mm × 11 mm × 8 mmConduction blockR-MUAP in TA, PLConservativeSatisfactory improvement
40MaleDrop foot with sensory impairment+8 mm × 8 mm × 6 mmFocal slowingAD in PL, R-MUAP in TA, PLConservativeCompletely resolved
22MaleDrop foot with sensory impairment-9 mm × 9 mm × 7 mmFocal slowingR-MUAP in TA, PLConservativeCompletely resolved
25MaleDrop foot with sensory impairment-7 mm × 5 mm × 4 mmFocal slowingAD in TAConservativeSatisfactory improvement
Patel et al[3]67MaleDrop foot with sensory impairment-23 mm × 20 mmFocal slowingNormalSurgeryCompletely resolved
Lee et al[8]79FemaleDrop foot with sensory impairment+16 mm × 20 mm × 15 mmConduction blockAD in TASurgeryCompletely resolved
Kubota et al[9]50FemaleDrop foot with sensory-5 mm × 5 mmFocal slowingAD in TA, PL, EDLConservativePartially resolved