Tian Y, Liu PF, Li JY, Li YN, Sun P. Hepatic MR imaging using IDEAL-IQ sequence: Will Gd-EOB-DTPA interfere with reproductivity of fat fraction quantification? World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(25): 5887-5896 [PMID: 37727487 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i25.5887]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Peng Sun, MM, Attending Doctor, Department of Magnetic Resonance, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No. 23 Youzheng Street, Nangang District, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang Province, China. 19526333113@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Sep 6, 2023; 11(25): 5887-5896 Published online Sep 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i25.5887
Table 1 Baseline patient characteristics and treatment history
Demographics
Parameter
No. of patients (%)
Age
< 60 yr
51 (65)
> 60 yr
28 (35)
Sex
Male
48 (60)
Female
17 (40)
Cause
HBV
20 (30)
HCV
9 (14)
HBV and HCV
2 (3)
Alcohol
25 (38)
Cryptogenic
9 (14)
Cirrhosis
Present
35 (54)
Absent
30 (46)
Methods of diagnosis
Biopsy
15 (23)
MR imaging
50 (77)
Tumor characteristics
Unifocal
43 (66)
Multifocal
22 (34)
Diameter of lesion
< 3 cm
42 (65)
> 3 cm
23 (35)
No treatment
45 (69)
Treated
Surgical treatment
9 (14)
Internal medicine
11 (17)
Table 2 Fat fraction and R2* (mean ± SD, n = 65) of the liver, spleen and spine at four time instants
Index
T1
T2
T3
T4
Liver FF
6.0567 ± 3.1295
6.0622 ± 3.1026
6.0928 ± 3.0863
6.103 ± 3.1272
Spleen FF
2.0183 ± 0.7687
2.0363 ± 0.7531
2.0478 ± 0.7633
2.0652 ± 0.7494
Spine FF
25.6275 ± 6.6189
25.6422 ± 6.5966
25.6495 ± 6.5979
25.6648 ± 6.5941
Liver R2*
43.1359 ± 9.95
48.211 ± 10.0155
49.5981 ± 10.0038
52.0894 ± 10.0021
Spleen R2*
42.9711 ± 13.9805
46.0781 ± 13.7729
46.3787 ± 13.7615
46.7647 ± 13.796
Spine R2*
121.7495 ± 20.602
124.902 ± 20.3045
125.7506 ± 20.263
126.4444 ± 20.3439
Table 3 The comparison of fat fraction (n = 65) before and after hepatocyte-specific contrast media injection
Variation
DF
SS
MS
F
P value
T1-T2 (liver)
1
0.001
0.001
0.0319
0.8584
T1-T3 (liver)
1
0.0417
0.0417
1.3901
0.2399
T1-T4 (liver)
1
0.0685
0.0685
2.2825
0.1325
T1-T2 (spleen)
1
0.0103
0.0103
0.4911
0.4843
T1-T3 (spleen)
1
0.0328
0.0328
1.5601
0.2132
T1-T4 (spleen)
1
0.0703
0.0703
3.3418
0.0691
T1-T2 (spleen)
1
0.0069
0.0069
0.1703
0.6803
T1-T3 (spleen)
1
0.0157
0.0157
0.3859
0.5352
T1-T4 (spleen)
1
0.045
0.045
1.1053
0.2944
Table 4 The comparison of R2* (n = 65) before and after injection of Gadoxetate disodium
Variation
DF
SS
MS
F
P value
T1-T2 (liver)
1
297.9598
297.9598
476.8081
< 0.0001
T1-T3 (liver)
1
377.59
377.59
604.2357
< 0.0001
T1-T4 (liver)
1
492.3481
492.3481
787.8766
< 0.0001
T1-T2 (spleen)
1
299.2445
299.2445
1035.896
< 0.0001
T1-T3 (spleen)
1
359.9598
359.9598
1246.074
< 0.0001
T1-T4 (spleen)
1
446.1213
446.1213
1544.34
< 0.0001
T1-T2 (spleen)
1
313.126
313.126
317.1906
< 0.0001
T1-T3 (spleen)
1
504.28
504.28
510.826
< 0.0001
T1-T4 (spleen)
1
694.3318
694.3318
703.3447
< 0.0001
Citation: Tian Y, Liu PF, Li JY, Li YN, Sun P. Hepatic MR imaging using IDEAL-IQ sequence: Will Gd-EOB-DTPA interfere with reproductivity of fat fraction quantification? World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(25): 5887-5896