Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 6, 2023; 11(22): 5236-5243
Published online Aug 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i22.5236
Published online Aug 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i22.5236
Table 1 General characteristics of subjects (n = 223) (mean ± SD)
General characteristic | n | % | ||
Gender | Male | 109 | 48.90 | - |
Female | 114 | 51.10 | ||
Age (yr) | 20-29 | 38 | 17.04 | 48.80 ± 18.10 |
30-39 | 38 | 17.04 | ||
40-49 | 36 | 16.14 | ||
50-59 | 36 | 16.14 | ||
60-69 | 40 | 17.94 | ||
70- | 35 | 15.70 | ||
Level of education | Illiteracy | 10 | 4.48 | 12.27 ± 4.00 |
Elementary school | 19 | 8.52 | ||
Middle school | 22 | 9.87 | ||
High school | 57 | 25.56 | ||
Junior college | 50 | 22.42 | ||
University | 65 | 29.15 | ||
Residence | Seoul/Gyeonggi province | 88 | 39.46 | - |
Gyeongsang province | 10 | 4.48 | ||
Jeolla province | 1 | 0.45 | ||
Gangwon province | 116 | 52.02 | ||
Chungcheong province | 7 | 3.14 | ||
Jeju province | 1 | 0.45 |
Table 2 Accuracy score and total omission errors
Linear regression | F | r2 | P value | Descriptive statistics | |||||
Minimum value | Maximum value | Mean | Standard error | Cutoff | Pathological cutoff | ||||
Total | 1.91 | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 14.00 | 2.74 | 0.21 | 3.15 | 5 |
20-29 | 0.49 | 0.03 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 1.95 | 0.36 | 2.64 | 4 |
30-39 | 2.05 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 13.00 | 2.68 | 0.53 | 3.72 | 5 |
40-49 | 2.07 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 13.00 | 2.53 | 0.48 | 3.46 | 5 |
50-59 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 12.00 | 3.50 | 0.57 | 4.61 | 6 |
60-69 | 1.33 | 0.07 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 14.00 | 2.65 | 0.47 | 3.56 | 5 |
70- | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 13.00 | 3.23 | 0.60 | 4.41 | 6 |
Table 3 Asymmetry score for egocentric neglect-omission error difference
Linear regression | F | r2 | P value | Descriptive statistics | |||||
Minimum value | Maximum value | Mean | Standard error | Cutoff | Pathological cutoff | ||||
Total | 1.09 | 0.01 | 0.34 | -3.00 | 3.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 2 |
20-29 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.96 | -2.00 | 1.00 | -0.29 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 1 |
30-39 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.91 | -2.00 | 3.00 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.50 | 2 |
40-49 | 0.51 | 0.03 | 0.60 | -3.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.31 | 2 |
50-59 | 0.85 | 0.05 | 0.44 | -3.00 | 2.00 | -0.19 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 2 |
60-69 | 0.28 | 0.02 | 0.76 | -2.00 | 3.00 | 0.25 | 0.17 | 0.58 | 2 |
70- | 0.50 | 0.03 | 0.61 | -3.00 | 3.00 | 0.57 | 0.21 | 0.99 | 2 |
Table 4 Asymmetry score for allocentric neglect-commission error difference
Linear regression | F | r2 | P value | Descriptive statistics | |||||
Minimum value | Maximum value | Mean | Standard error | Cutoff | Pathological cutoff | ||||
Total | 1.67 | 0.02 | 0.19 | -3.00 | 2.00 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 2 |
20-29 | 1.35 | 0.07 | 0.27 | -1.00 | 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 2 |
30-39 | 0.58 | 0.03 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.17 | 2 |
40-49 | 0.29 | 0.02 | 0.75 | -1.00 | 1.00 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 2 |
50-59 | 3.74 | 0.19 | 0.03a | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 2 |
60-69 | 2.25 | 0.11 | 0.12 | -3.00 | 2.00 | -0.05 | 0.09 | 0.14 | 2 |
70- | 2.18 | 0.12 | 0.13 | -1.00 | 2.00 | 0.57 | 0.09 | 0.75 | 2 |
Table 5 Expected and maximum time of execution in seconds
Time | Age | |||||||||||||
20 | 25 | 30 | 35 | 40 | 45 | 50 | 55 | 60 | 65 | 70 | 75 | 80 | ||
Expected time | ||||||||||||||
Level of education | 0 | 122 | 126 | 129 | 133 | 137 | 141 | 145 | 148 | 152 | 156 | 160 | 164 | 167 |
6 | 99 | 103 | 107 | 111 | 115 | 118 | 122 | 126 | 130 | 134 | 137 | 141 | 145 | |
9 | 88 | 92 | 96 | 99 | 103 | 107 | 111 | 115 | 118 | 122 | 126 | 130 | 134 | |
12 | 77 | 81 | 84 | 88 | 92 | 96 | 100 | 103 | 107 | 111 | 115 | 119 | 122 | |
14 | 69 | 73 | 77 | 81 | 85 | 88 | 92 | 96 | 100 | 104 | 107 | 111 | 115 | |
16 | 62 | 66 | 70 | 73 | 77 | 81 | 85 | 89 | 92 | 96 | 100 | 104 | 108 | |
Maximum time | ||||||||||||||
Level of education | 0 | 198 | 201 | 205 | 209 | 213 | 217 | 220 | 224 | 228 | 232 | 236 | 239 | 243 |
6 | 175 | 179 | 183 | 187 | 190 | 194 | 198 | 202 | 206 | 209 | 213 | 217 | 221 | |
9 | 164 | 168 | 172 | 175 | 179 | 183 | 187 | 191 | 194 | 198 | 202 | 206 | 210 | |
12 | 153 | 157 | 160 | 164 | 168 | 172 | 176 | 179 | 183 | 187 | 191 | 195 | 198 | |
14 | 145 | 149 | 153 | 157 | 160 | 164 | 168 | 172 | 176 | 179 | 183 | 187 | 191 | |
16 | 138 | 142 | 145 | 149 | 153 | 157 | 161 | 164 | 168 | 172 | 176 | 180 | 183 |
- Citation: Jang WH, Jang JS. Standardization of apple cancellation test for neglect patients in Korea: An observational study. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(22): 5236-5243
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i22/5236.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i22.5236