Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2023; 11(21): 5056-5062
Published online Jul 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i21.5056
Table 1 Comparison of care outcomes after care between groups, n (%)
Grouping
Number of examples
Visible effect
Effective
Invalid
Total efficiency
Control group4015 (37.50)15 (37.50)10 (25.00)30 (75.00)
Experimental group4027 (67.50)10 (25.00)3 (7.50)37 (92.50)
χ2----4.501
P----0.034
Table 2 Comparison of changes in traditional Chinese medicine symptom scores, visual analogue scale scores and Pittsburgh sleep quality index scores before and after care between groups (mean ± SD, points)
Grouping
Number of examples
Chinese Medicine symptom score
VAS score
PSQI score
Before care
After care
Before care
After care
Before care
After care
Control group4019.82 ± 4.0414.27 ± 2.676.81 ± 1.344.02 ± 1.2017.15 ± 1.0913.04 ± 1.10
Experimental group4019.88 ± 4.0112.05 ± 2.256.77 ± 1.353.11 ± 1.1817.09 ± 1.1010.82 ± 1.07
t-0.0674.0210.1333.4200.2459.149
P-0.9470.0000.8940.0010.8070.000