Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 16, 2023; 11(20): 4874-4882
Published online Jul 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i20.4874
Published online Jul 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i20.4874
Table 1 General information (mean ± SD) on the sample population and differences among delivery groups
Characteristic | Sample | Mode of delivery | P value | ||||
M | Range | Pre-labor CS (n = 82) | Normal vaginal delivery (n = 155) | Forceps delivery (n = 15) | CS in labor (n = 49) | ||
SPAA (°) | 99.37 | 81-122.2 | 101.77 ± 6.12 | 99.29 ± 6.48 | 99.18 ± 5.28 | 95.62 ± 5.42 | 0.000 |
1st stage of labor (h) | - | - | - | 5.93 ± 3.53 | 6.23 ± 3.37 | - | - |
2nd stage of labor (h) | - | - | - | 0.48 ± 0.31 | 0.52 ± 0.40 | - | - |
Age (yr) | 30.22 | 21-41 | 30.67 ± 3.06 | 29.76 ± 2.97 | 30.33 ± 2.87 | 30.88 ± 3.38 | 0.059 |
Height (meters) | 1.63 | 1.50-1.78 | 1.63 ± 0.04 | 1.64 ± 0.05 | 1.62 ± 0.04 | 1.62 ± 0.05 | 0.091 |
Gestational age at delivery (wk) | 39.40 | 36-41 | 39.35 ± 1.10 | 39.31 ± 0.97 | 39.73 ± 1.16 | 39.67 ± 0.97 | 0.173 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 27.14 | 19-38 | 27.91 ± 3.45 | 26.51 ± 2.76 | 26.61 ± 2.57 | 27.99 ± 2.56 | 0.001 |
Weight gain (kg) | 14.05 ± 6.21 | 9-52 | 14.37 ± 5.21 | 13.10 ± 4.12 | 12.60 ± 3.07 | 14.43 ± 4.59 | 0.084 |
Birth weight (g) | 3426.13 | 2500-4500 | 3496.95 ± 394.84 | 3336.86 ± 344.73 | 3522.67 ± 336.99 | 3560.41 ± 410.54 | 0.000 |
Table 2 Effects of the subpubic arch angle and other factors on the ability to deliver vaginally
Predictors | Odds ratio (95%CI) | P value |
Age (yr) | 1.13 (1.00–1.27) | 0.042 |
Height (meters) | 0.00 (0.00–0.41) | 0.026 |
Gestational age at delivery (wk) | 1.27 (0.87–1.84) | 0.214 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 1.11 (0.97–1.26) | 0.130 |
Weight gain (kg) | 1.05 (0.97–1.14) | 0.256 |
Birth weight (g) | 1.00 (1.001–1.003) | 0.000 |
SPAA (°) | 0.90 (0.84–0.95) | 0.000 |
Table 3 Predictive effect of the subpubic arch angle with respect to the duration of the first stage of vaginal delivery and other factors
Predictors | B (95%CI) | P value |
Age (yr) | -0.02 (-0.21 to 0.16) | 0.789 |
Height (meters) | -0.09 (-17.39 to 4.62) | 0.254 |
Gestational age at delivery (wk) | 0.02 (-0.50 to 0.66) | 0.785 |
BMI (kg/m2) | -0.03 (-0.25 to 0.18) | 0.758 |
Weight gain (kg) | -0.19 (-0.31 to 0.02) | 0.025 |
Birth weight (g) | 0.13 (0.000 to 0.003) | 0.135 |
SPAA (°) | 0.06 (-0.05 to 0.12) | 0.459 |
Table 4 Predictive effect of the subpubic arch angle with respect to the second stage of labor in the normal vaginal delivery group
Predictors | B (95%CI) | P value |
Age (yr) | 0.17 (0.002 to 0.071) | 0.039 |
Height (meters) | -0.18 (-4.63 to -0.55) | 0.013 |
Gestational age at delivery (wk) | 0.02 (-0.10 to 0.13) | 0.853 |
BMI (kg/m2) | -0.11 (-0.074 to 0.005) | 0.087 |
Weight gain (kg) | 0.02 (-0.02 to 0.03) | 0.765 |
Birth weight (g) | 0.09 (0.000 to 0.001) | 0.316 |
SPAA (°) | 0.13 (-0.001 to 0.03) | 0.045 |
- Citation: Liang ZW, Gao WL. Predictive value of the trans-perineal three-dimensional ultrasound measurement of the pubic arch angle for vaginal delivery. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(20): 4874-4882
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i20/4874.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i20.4874