Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 26, 2023; 11(18): 4231-4240
Published online Jun 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i18.4231
Published online Jun 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i18.4231
Ref. | Region of interest | Modality | AI performance | Human performance |
Niiya et al[33], 2022 | Ribs | CT | 0.93 (sensitivity) | Data has not provided by the authors |
Meng et al[34], 2021 | Ribs | CT | 0.92 (recall rate); 0.94 (precision) | 0.79, 083 (recall rate of radiologist 1 & 2); 0.88 (precision of radiologist 1 & 2) |
Ozkaya et al[22], 2022 | Hand & Wrist (Scaphoid) | Radiographs | 0.84 (AUC); 0.72 (sensitivity) | 0.92, 0.76 (AUC of experienced orthopedist, and ED physician, respectively); 0.86, 0.62 (sensitivity of experienced orthopedist, and ED physician, respectively) |
Oka et al[23], 2021 | Hand & Wrist (Distal of radius & styloid process of the ulna) | Radiographs | 0.98 ± 0.016/0.98 ± 0.018 & 0.91 ± 0.025/0.96 ± 0.035; (accuracy/sensitivity for detecting distal radius fractures & fractures of the ulnar styloid process, respectively) | Data not provided by the authors |
Liu et al[24], 2021 | Tibial plateau fractures | Radiographs | 0.91 (accuracy) | 0.92 ± 0.03 (accuracy) |
Small et al[25], 2021 | Vertebrae (Cervical) | CT | 0.92 (accuracy); 0.79 (sensitivity); 3-8 min (report time) | 0.96 (accuracy); 0.93 (sensitivity); 33-43 min (report time) |
Murata et al[26], 2020 | Vertebrae | Radiographs | 0.86 (accuracy); 0.84 (sensitivity) | 0.77, 0.88 (accuracy rate of orthopedic residents & orthopedic surgeons, respectively); 0.72, 0.77, 0.96 (sensitivity of orthopedic residents, orthopedic, surgeons & spine surgeons, respectively) |
Mutasa et al[27], 2020 | Femur (Femoral neck) | Radiographs | 0.92 (accuracy); 0.91 (sensitivity); 0.93 (specificity) | Data not provided by the authors |
Bae et al[29], 2021 | Femur (Femoral neck) | Radiographs | 0.98 (AUC); 0.98 (accuracy); 0.97 (sensitivity); 0.98 (specificity) | Data not provided by the authors |
Jones et al[30], 2020 | Various anatomic regions | Radiographs | Mean AUCs above 0.98 for most areas | Data not provided by the authors |
Guermazi et al[31], 2022 | Various anatomic regions | Radiographs | 0.93 (AUC) 0.88 (Sensitivity); 0.88 (specificity) | 0.64 ± 0.09 (sensitivity); 0.90 ± 0.08 (specificity) |
Inoue et al[32], 2022 | Pelvis, rib, vertebrae | CT | 0.78 (sensitivity); 0.64 (accuracy) | 0.69 (sensitivity of orthopedic surgeon 1); 0.67 (sensitivity of orthopedic surgeon 2); 0.76 (sensitivity of orthopedic surgeon 3) |
- Citation: Salimi M, Parry JA, Shahrokhi R, Mosalamiaghili S. Application of artificial intelligence in trauma orthopedics: Limitation and prospects. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(18): 4231-4240
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i18/4231.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i18.4231