Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 6, 2022; 10(7): 2166-2173
Published online Mar 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i7.2166
Table 1 Comparison of the characteristics of the patients (female)
Variables
Old sperm group (n = 15)
Fresh sperm group (n = 13)
P value
Age (yr)29.5 ± 2.130.6 ± 2.30.175
Infertility duration (yr)3.4 ± 1.93.1 ± 2.00.546
Average Gn days9.9 ± 3.211.1 ± 1.50.324
Average Gn consumption (IU)2591.2 ± 1453.72076.6 ± 1267.30.532
BMI21.2 ± 2.421.6 ± 2.70.301
Average oocyte number12.1 ± 4.713.5 ± 4.90.326
Table 2 Comparison of the characteristics of the patients (male)
Variables
Old sperm group(n = 15)
Fresh sperm group(n = 13)
P value
Age (yr)32.5 ± 2.231.6 ± 2.30.324
Infertility duration (yr)3.4 ± 1.93.1 ± 2.00.546
Motile sperm number (× 106)3.22.90.245
Table 3 Comparison of the 24 h in vitro maturation rate of the two groups
Groups
No. of GV oocytes
No. of MII oocytes (24 h)
Maturation rate (%)
Old sperm group1025251.0
Fresh sperm group1226855.7a
Table 4 Comparison of in vitro maturation outcomes between the two groups
Variables
Old sperm Group
Fresh sperm Group
P value
2PN rate (%)61.5 (32/52)64.7 (44/68)0.130
Cleavage rate (%)93.8 (30/32)93.2 (41/44)1.00
day-3 top embryo rate (%)16.6 (5/30)63.4 (26/41)0.001a
Useful blastocyst rate (%)6.67 (2/30)34.6 (9/26)0.009a