Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 26, 2022; 10(6): 1826-1833
Published online Feb 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i6.1826
Table 1 Comparison of Piper Fatigue Scale scores of the two groups (mean ± SD, points)
Groups
Time
Behavior
Cognition
Emotion
Feelings
Total PFS scores
Observation group (n = 52)Before intervention5.15 ± 1.494.09 ± 1.385.37 ± 1.484.19 ± 1.3518.80 ± 2.74
After intervention2.60 ± 0.8212.44 ± 1.0113.46 ± 1.1312.25 ± 0.77118.55 ± 2.851
Control group (n = 51)Before intervention5.06 ± 1.424.03 ± 1.245.34 ± 1.414.12 ± 1.3810.75 ± 1.76
After intervention4.63 ± 1.3713.78 ± 1.1314.47 ± 1.2613.03 ± 0.95115.92 ± 2.451
Tafter intervention-9.1906.3484.2854.58212.304
Pafter intervention-< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
Table 2 Comparison of Herth hope Index scores of the two groups (mean ± SD, points)
Groups
Time
Maintain close contact with others
Take positive attitude
Attitudes toward reality and the future
Total HHI scores
Observation group (n = 52)Before intervention9.14 ± 2.289.53 ± 2.7210.93 ± 2.4329.61 ± 4.57
After intervention14.06 ± 1.78114.28 ± 1.89114.52 ± 1.76142.86 ± 3.521
Control group (n = 51)Before intervention9.33 ± 2.649.48 ± 2.6610.85 ± 3.1629.69 ± 5.24
After intervention10.67 ± 1.69111.08 ± 1.46112.03 ± 1.39133.78 ± 2.581
Tafter intervention-9.9099.6037.95814.894
Pafter intervention-< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
Table 3 Comparison of Hamilton Anxiety Scale and Hamilton Depression Scale scores of the two groups (mean ± SD, points)
Groups
Time
HAMA
HAMD
Observation group (n = 52)Before intervention20.22 ± 2.5522.07 ± 4.57
After intervention9.11 ± 3.1219.98 ± 3.211
Control group (n = 51)Before intervention20.06 ± 3.1222.25 ± 4.22
After intervention13.97 ± 3.32116.88 ± 3.551
Tafter intervention-7.65710.351
Pafter intervention-< 0.001< 0.001
Table 4 Comparison of Chinese Strategies Used by People to Promote Health scores between the two groups (mean ± SD, points)
Groups
Time
Positive attitude
Self-determination
Self-relief
Observation group (n = 52)Before intervention39.48 ± 9.198.33 ± 2.3529.57 ± 6.71
After intervention52.87 ± 7.72111.29 ± 2.49135.46 ± 6.421
Control group (n = 51)Before intervention40.40 ± 9.547.82 ± 1.8328.78 ± 5.92
After intervention47.80 ± 9.1819.04 ± 2.65131.42 ± 5.981
Tafter intervention-3.0364.4423.303
Pafter intervention-0.003< 0.0010.001