Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 26, 2022; 10(36): 13227-13238
Published online Dec 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13227
Table 1 Patient characteristics, n = 80
Characteristics
n (%) or mean ± SD
Age (yr)58.5 ± 8.8
Male sex36 (45.0)
Site of the primary extrathoracic malignancy
Breast18 (22.5)
Colon12 (15.0)
Rectal11 (13.8)
Gastric11 (13.8)
Renal cell7 (8.8)
Thyroid6 (7.5)
Head and neck15 (6.3)
Endometrial3 (3.8)
Hepatic cell2 (2.5)
Other25 (6.3)
Site of intrathoracic lymphadenopathy
Mediastinal only43 (53.8)
Mediastinal and hilar21 (26.2)
Hilar only16 (20.0)
Status of the extrathoracic malignancy
Metachronous66 (82.5)
Synchronous14 (17.5)
CT findings
Intrathoracic nodal enlargement with pulmonary lesion39 (48.8)
Short axis of the target lymph node in mm18.1 ± 6.7
PET-CT findings
Patients with PET-CT examination49 (61.3)
SUVmax of the target lymph nodes9.2 ± 5.0
Table 2 Primary extrathoracic malignancy site and the final pathologic result of the intrathoracic lymphadenopathy
Extrathoracic malignancy
n (%)
Location
EBUS
Surgery
Follow-up
Paratracheal
Subcarinal
Hilar and lobar
ETM LNM
PLC LNM
Benign
ETM LNM
PLC LNM
Benign
FO
ETM LNM
Breast cancer18 (22.5)12881132--11-
Colon cancer12 (15.0)84473----11
Rectal cancer11 (13.8)42873-1----
Gastric cancer11 (13.8)75662--11-
Renal cell cancer7 (8.8)6426--1----
Thyroid cancer6 (7.5)622123-----
Head and neck cancer15 (6.3)3323---11--
Endometrial cancer3 (3.8)1222-1-----
Hepatic cell cancer2 (2.5)1102-------
Other25 (6.3)4242-2---1-
Total80 (100.0)523338471392135
Table 3 Risk factors of being malignant for intrathoracic lymphadenopathy
CovariatesUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
OR (95%CI)
P
OR (95%CI)
P
Sex
Female1
Male 1.720 (0.727-4.071)0.217
Age (yr)
≤ 601
> 601.647 (0.696-3.900)0.257
Size of sampled lymph node1.113 (1.036-1.196)0.0031.200 (1.024-1.407)0.024
Site of lymphadenopathy
Mediastinal and hilar 1
Mediastinal only1.244 (0.528-2.932)0.617
Hilar only6.788 (0.819-56.257)0.076
Status of synchronous lung lesion
Without11
With8.082 (2.292-28.501)0.00119.449 (1.875-201.753)0.013
Status of synchronous ETM
Synchronous1
Metachronous1.057 (0.629-1.776)0.834
SUVmax of sampled lymph node0.987 (0.887-1.098)0.806
Table 4 Factors influencing endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration accuracy in intrathoracic malignant lymphadenopathy, n = 94
CovariatesAccurate number,Univariate analysis
n (%)
OR (95%CI)
P value
Sex
Female46 (92.0)1
Male 41 (93.2)1.783 (0.310-10.246)0.571
Age (yr)
≤ 6047 (92.2)1
> 6040 (93.0)1.702 (0.296-9.785)0.551
Location of sampled lymph node
Hilar27 (93.1)1
Paratracheal36 (92.3)2.000 (0.312-12.815)0.465
Subcarinal24 (92.3)2.667 (0.260-27.381)0.409
Determination of target lymph node
PET-CT and CT52 (90.0)1
CT only35 (97.2)3.365 (0.377-30.052)0.277
Size of short axis in sampled lymph node in mm18.9 ± 7.01.093 (0.975-1.248)0.191
SUVmax of sampled lymph node8.8 ± 5.10.877 (0.753-1.015)0.077
Number of passes per lymph node, times, median (range)2 (1-5)2.097 (0.691-6.253)0.193
Histological specimen acquired
No7 (87.5)1
Yes80 (93.0)2.286 (0.233-22.387)0.478
Operator of EBUS-TBNA
Dr. LSJ70 (92.1)1
Dr. WQ17 (94.4)1.124 (0.133-11.085)0.863