Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 26, 2022; 10(33): 12146-12155
Published online Nov 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i33.12146
Published online Nov 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i33.12146
Table 1 Comparison of general data of the two groups of patients (mean ± SD)
Index | Group A (n = 60) | Group B (n = 60) | t/χ2 value | P value |
Age (yr) | 69.6 ± 5.3 | 70.3 ± 5.7 | -0.697 | 0.487 |
Height (cm) | 165.0 ± 6.1 | 163.9 ± 5.5 | 1.037 | 0.302 |
Body weight (kg) | 125.1 ± 9.7 | 126.4 ± 7.5 | -0.821 | 0.413 |
SBP (mmHg) | 129.5 ± 7.6 | 128.0 ± 8.2 | 1.039 | 0.301 |
DBP (mmHg) | 75.2 ± 6.9 | 76.8 ± 7.7 | -1.199 | 0.233 |
HR (beats/min) | 76.4 ± 8.1 | 75.0 ± 7.0 | 1.013 | 0.313 |
Sex, n (%) | 0.862 | 0.353 | ||
Male | 33 (55.00) | 38 (63.33) | ||
Female | 27 (45.00) | 22 (36.67) | ||
hypertension, n (%) | 1.269 | 0.260 | ||
Yes | 26 (43.33) | 20 (33.33) | ||
No | 34 (56.67) | 40 (66.67) | ||
Diabetes, n (%) | 1.713 | 0.191 | ||
Yes | 11 (18.33) | 6 (10.00) | ||
No | 49 (81.67) | 54 (90.00) | ||
ASA stage, n (%) | 2.874 | 0.238 | ||
I stage | 15 (25.00) | 10 (16.67) | ||
II stage | 35 (58.33) | 33 (55.00) | ||
III stage | 10 (16.67) | 17 (28.33) |
Table 2 Comparison of surgical indicators between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group | Operation time (min) | Anesthesia time (min) | Total rehydration (mL) | Urine volume (mL) |
Group A (n = 60) | 216.3 ± 20.5 | 233.8 ± 19.5 | 2568.1 ± 208.4 | 398.5 ± 58.1 |
Group B (n = 60) | 212.0 ± 22.7 | 229.5 ± 22.8 | 2590.4 ± 211.7 | 410.3 ± 63.5 |
t value | 1.089 | 1.110 | -0.581 | -1.062 |
P value | 0.278 | 0.269 | 0.562 | 0.290 |
Table 3 Comparison of surgical indicators between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group | Operation time (min) | Anesthesia time (min) | Total rehydration (mL) | Urine volume (mL) |
Group A (n = 60) | 216.3 ± 20.5 | 233.8 ± 19.5 | 2568.1 ± 208.4 | 398.5 ± 58.1 |
Group B (n = 60) | 212.0 ± 22.7 | 229.5 ± 22.8 | 2590.4 ± 211.7 | 410.3 ± 63.5 |
t value | 1.089 | 1.110 | -0.581 | -1.062 |
P value | 0.278 | 0.269 | 0.562 | 0.290 |
Table 4 Comparison of airway compliance indexes between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 |
Ppeak (cmH2O) | ||||
Group A (n = 60) | 15.36 ± 2.44 | 20.06 ± 1.98 | 21.58 ± 2.74 | 17.41 ± 2.80 |
Group B (n = 60) | 16.11 ± 2.70 | 18.62 ± 2.70 | 20.67 ± 2.68 | 18.15 ± 2.76 |
t value | -1.596 | 3.331 | 1.839 | -1.458 |
P value | 0.113 | 0.001 | 0.068 | 0.148 |
Pmean (cmH2O) | ||||
Group A (n = 60) | 8.51 ± 1.84 | 10.33 ± 1.96 | 11.36 ± 2.24 | 10.71 ± 2.54 |
Group B (n = 60) | 8.93 ± 2.00 | 9.81 ± 2.71 | 10.95 ± 2.46 | 10.40 ± 2.75 |
t value | -1.197 | 1.204 | 0.955 | 0.641 |
P value | 0.234 | 0.231 | 0.342 | 0.522 |
Cdyn (cmH2O) | ||||
Group A (n = 60) | 38.64 ± 3.11 | 30.52 ± 3.04 | 29.64 ± 3.11 | 33.75 ± 3.58 |
Group B (n = 60) | 39.33 ± 4.05 | 28.64 ± 3.58 | 28.11 ± 2.90 | 32.68 ± 2.83 |
t value | -1.047 | 3.101 | 2.787 | 1.816 |
P value | 0.297 | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.072 |
Table 5 Comparison of serum inflammatory factor levels before and after operation between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group | TNF-α (ng/mL) | IL-6 (pg/mL) | IL-10 (pg/mL) | |||
Preoperative | 4 h after operation | Preoperative | 4 h after operation | Preoperative | 4 h after operation | |
Group A (n = 60) | 43.26 ± 6.80 | 76.65 ± 8.77 | 47.14 ± 5.50 | 56.94 ± 7.30 | 34.62 ± 5.10 | 29.51 ± 4.75 |
Group B (n = 60) | 45.10 ± 6.55 | 89.28 ± 12.64 | 45.03 ± 6.28 | 69.71 ± 10.38 | 36.36 ± 6.15 | 25.83 ± 5.08 |
t value | -1.510 | -6.359 | 1.958 | -7.795 | -1.687 | 4.099 |
P value | 0.134 | 0.000 | 0.053 | 0.000 | 0.094 | 0.000 |
Table 6 Comparison of hemodynamic indexes between two groups of patients before and after operation (mean ± SD)
Group | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 |
CO (L/min) | ||||
Group A (n = 60) | 4.81 ± 0.85 | 4.43 ± 0.80 | 4.36 ± 0.75 | 4.51 ± 0.83 |
Group B (n = 60) | 4.95 ± 0.90 | 4.30 ± 0.78 | 4.13 ± 0.80 | 4.37 ± 0.86 |
t value | -0.876 | 0.901 | 1.625 | 0.907 |
P value | 0.383 | 0.369 | 0.107 | 0.366 |
CI [L/(min·m2)] | ||||
Group A (n = 60) | 4.11 ± 0.40 | 3.83 ± 0.46 | 3.51 ± 0.42 | 3.68 ± 0.40 |
Group B (n = 60) | 4.26 ± 0.44 | 3.90 ± 0.50 | 3.30 ± 0.39 | 3.53 ± 0.44 |
t value | -1.954 | -0.798 | 2.838 | 1.954 |
P value | 0.053 | 0.426 | 0.005 | 0.053 |
SVI (mL/m2) | ||||
Group A (n = 60) | 47.52 ± 4.63 | 44.03 ± 3.75 | 43.85 ± 3.11 | 45.08 ± 4.09 |
Group B (n = 60) | 48.36 ± 4.90 | 43.41 ± 4.03 | 41.66 ± 3.57 | 44.13 ± 4.37 |
t value | -0.965 | 0.872 | 3.583 | 1.229 |
P value | 0.336 | 0.385 | 0.000 | 0.221 |
MAP (mmHg) | ||||
Group A (n = 60) | 97.63 ± 4.15 | 88.16 ± 5.20 | 87.11 ± 4.64 | 102.84 ± 5.00 |
Group B (n = 60) | 98.90 ± 4.68 | 86.85 ± 4.96 | 86.08 ± 5.03 | 104.07 ± 4.86 |
t value | -1.573 | 1.412 | 1.166 | -1.366 |
P value | 0.118 | 0.161 | 0.246 | 0.174 |
Table 7 Comparison of the complication rate between the two groups
Group | Lung infection | Atelectasis | Other | Complication rate (%) |
Group A (n = 60) | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 (5.00) |
Group B (n = 60) | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 (11.67) |
χ2 value | 1.745 | |||
P value | 0.186 |
- Citation: Wang Y, Yang Y, Wang DM, Li J, Bao QT, Wang BB, Zhu SJ, Zou L. Different positive end expiratory pressure and tidal volume controls on lung protection and inflammatory factors during surgical anesthesia. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(33): 12146-12155
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i33/12146.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i33.12146