Wang Y, Yang Y, Wang DM, Li J, Bao QT, Wang BB, Zhu SJ, Zou L. Different positive end expiratory pressure and tidal volume controls on lung protection and inflammatory factors during surgical anesthesia. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(33): 12146-12155 [PMID: 36483798 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i33.12146]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Lu Zou, MD, Associate Chief Physician, Chief Doctor, Department of Anesthesiology, Changzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 25 Heping North Road, Tianning District, Changzhou 213000, Jiangsu Province, China. baobao01013812@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Anesthesiology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Nov 26, 2022; 10(33): 12146-12155 Published online Nov 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i33.12146
Table 1 Comparison of general data of the two groups of patients (mean ± SD)
Index
Group A (n = 60)
Group B (n = 60)
t/χ2 value
P value
Age (yr)
69.6 ± 5.3
70.3 ± 5.7
-0.697
0.487
Height (cm)
165.0 ± 6.1
163.9 ± 5.5
1.037
0.302
Body weight (kg)
125.1 ± 9.7
126.4 ± 7.5
-0.821
0.413
SBP (mmHg)
129.5 ± 7.6
128.0 ± 8.2
1.039
0.301
DBP (mmHg)
75.2 ± 6.9
76.8 ± 7.7
-1.199
0.233
HR (beats/min)
76.4 ± 8.1
75.0 ± 7.0
1.013
0.313
Sex, n (%)
0.862
0.353
Male
33 (55.00)
38 (63.33)
Female
27 (45.00)
22 (36.67)
hypertension, n (%)
1.269
0.260
Yes
26 (43.33)
20 (33.33)
No
34 (56.67)
40 (66.67)
Diabetes, n (%)
1.713
0.191
Yes
11 (18.33)
6 (10.00)
No
49 (81.67)
54 (90.00)
ASA stage, n (%)
2.874
0.238
I stage
15 (25.00)
10 (16.67)
II stage
35 (58.33)
33 (55.00)
III stage
10 (16.67)
17 (28.33)
Table 2 Comparison of surgical indicators between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group
Operation time (min)
Anesthesia time (min)
Total rehydration (mL)
Urine volume (mL)
Group A (n = 60)
216.3 ± 20.5
233.8 ± 19.5
2568.1 ± 208.4
398.5 ± 58.1
Group B (n = 60)
212.0 ± 22.7
229.5 ± 22.8
2590.4 ± 211.7
410.3 ± 63.5
t value
1.089
1.110
-0.581
-1.062
P value
0.278
0.269
0.562
0.290
Table 3 Comparison of surgical indicators between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group
Operation time (min)
Anesthesia time (min)
Total rehydration (mL)
Urine volume (mL)
Group A (n = 60)
216.3 ± 20.5
233.8 ± 19.5
2568.1 ± 208.4
398.5 ± 58.1
Group B (n = 60)
212.0 ± 22.7
229.5 ± 22.8
2590.4 ± 211.7
410.3 ± 63.5
t value
1.089
1.110
-0.581
-1.062
P value
0.278
0.269
0.562
0.290
Table 4 Comparison of airway compliance indexes between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group
T0
T1
T2
T3
Ppeak (cmH2O)
Group A (n = 60)
15.36 ± 2.44
20.06 ± 1.98
21.58 ± 2.74
17.41 ± 2.80
Group B (n = 60)
16.11 ± 2.70
18.62 ± 2.70
20.67 ± 2.68
18.15 ± 2.76
t value
-1.596
3.331
1.839
-1.458
P value
0.113
0.001
0.068
0.148
Pmean (cmH2O)
Group A (n = 60)
8.51 ± 1.84
10.33 ± 1.96
11.36 ± 2.24
10.71 ± 2.54
Group B (n = 60)
8.93 ± 2.00
9.81 ± 2.71
10.95 ± 2.46
10.40 ± 2.75
t value
-1.197
1.204
0.955
0.641
P value
0.234
0.231
0.342
0.522
Cdyn (cmH2O)
Group A (n = 60)
38.64 ± 3.11
30.52 ± 3.04
29.64 ± 3.11
33.75 ± 3.58
Group B (n = 60)
39.33 ± 4.05
28.64 ± 3.58
28.11 ± 2.90
32.68 ± 2.83
t value
-1.047
3.101
2.787
1.816
P value
0.297
0.002
0.006
0.072
Table 5 Comparison of serum inflammatory factor levels before and after operation between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group
TNF-α (ng/mL)
IL-6 (pg/mL)
IL-10 (pg/mL)
Preoperative
4 h after operation
Preoperative
4 h after operation
Preoperative
4 h after operation
Group A (n = 60)
43.26 ± 6.80
76.65 ± 8.77
47.14 ± 5.50
56.94 ± 7.30
34.62 ± 5.10
29.51 ± 4.75
Group B (n = 60)
45.10 ± 6.55
89.28 ± 12.64
45.03 ± 6.28
69.71 ± 10.38
36.36 ± 6.15
25.83 ± 5.08
t value
-1.510
-6.359
1.958
-7.795
-1.687
4.099
P value
0.134
0.000
0.053
0.000
0.094
0.000
Table 6 Comparison of hemodynamic indexes between two groups of patients before and after operation (mean ± SD)
Group
T0
T1
T2
T3
CO (L/min)
Group A (n = 60)
4.81 ± 0.85
4.43 ± 0.80
4.36 ± 0.75
4.51 ± 0.83
Group B (n = 60)
4.95 ± 0.90
4.30 ± 0.78
4.13 ± 0.80
4.37 ± 0.86
t value
-0.876
0.901
1.625
0.907
P value
0.383
0.369
0.107
0.366
CI [L/(min·m2)]
Group A (n = 60)
4.11 ± 0.40
3.83 ± 0.46
3.51 ± 0.42
3.68 ± 0.40
Group B (n = 60)
4.26 ± 0.44
3.90 ± 0.50
3.30 ± 0.39
3.53 ± 0.44
t value
-1.954
-0.798
2.838
1.954
P value
0.053
0.426
0.005
0.053
SVI (mL/m2)
Group A (n = 60)
47.52 ± 4.63
44.03 ± 3.75
43.85 ± 3.11
45.08 ± 4.09
Group B (n = 60)
48.36 ± 4.90
43.41 ± 4.03
41.66 ± 3.57
44.13 ± 4.37
t value
-0.965
0.872
3.583
1.229
P value
0.336
0.385
0.000
0.221
MAP (mmHg)
Group A (n = 60)
97.63 ± 4.15
88.16 ± 5.20
87.11 ± 4.64
102.84 ± 5.00
Group B (n = 60)
98.90 ± 4.68
86.85 ± 4.96
86.08 ± 5.03
104.07 ± 4.86
t value
-1.573
1.412
1.166
-1.366
P value
0.118
0.161
0.246
0.174
Table 7 Comparison of the complication rate between the two groups
Group
Lung infection
Atelectasis
Other
Complication rate (%)
Group A (n = 60)
2
0
1
3 (5.00)
Group B (n = 60)
3
1
3
7 (11.67)
χ2 value
1.745
P value
0.186
Citation: Wang Y, Yang Y, Wang DM, Li J, Bao QT, Wang BB, Zhu SJ, Zou L. Different positive end expiratory pressure and tidal volume controls on lung protection and inflammatory factors during surgical anesthesia. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(33): 12146-12155