Xu H, Du QC, Wang XY, Zhou L, Wang J, Ma YY, Liu MY, Yu H. Comprehensive analysis of the relationship between cuproptosis-related genes and esophageal cancer prognosis. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(33): 12089-12103 [PMID: 36483804 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i33.12089]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Hua Yu, MM, Associate Chief Physician, General Surgery, Shanghai Fourth People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, No. 1279 Sanmen Road, Shanghai 200434, China. luckyyuhua@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Clinical and Translational Research
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Nov 26, 2022; 10(33): 12089-12103 Published online Nov 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i33.12089
Table 1 Demographic characteristics and clinicopathological characteristics
Variables
Total, n = 151
Esophagus cancer, n = 151
Adenocarcinoma, n = 74
Squamous cell carcinoma, n = 77
Age, yr
Median
60
68.5
57
Interquartile range
(53-72)
(57-77)
(51-63.5)
Sex
Female
22 (14.6%)
11 (14.9%)
11 (14.3%)
Male
129 (85.4%)
63 (85.1%)
66 (85.7%)
AJCC-TNM Stage
Ⅰ
18 (11.9%)
11 (14.9%)
7 (9.1%)
Ⅱ
70 (46.4%)
24 (32.4%)
46 (59.7%)
Ⅲ
51 (33.8%)
31 (41.9%)
20 (26.0%)
Ⅳ
12 (7.9%)
8 (10.8%)
4 (5.2%)
EGFR status
Mutant
5 (3.3%)
3 (4.1%)
2 (2.6%)
Wild-type
146 (96.7%)
71 (95.9%)
75 (97.4%)
KRAS status
Mutant
2 (1.3%)
2 (2.7%)
0 (0)
Wild-type
149 (98.7%)
72 (97.3%)
77 (100%)
BRAF status
Mutant
1 (0.7%)
0 (0)
1 (1.3%)
Wild-type
150 (99.3%)
74 (100%)
76 (98.7)
PIK3CA status
Mutant
14 (9.3%)
4 (5.4%)
10 (13.0%)
Wild-type
137 (90.7%)
70 (94.6%)
67 (87.0%)
OS event
Event
58 (38.4%)
36 (48.6%)
22 (28.6%)
Non-event
93 (61.6%)
38 (51.4%)
55 (71.4%)
OS months
Median
13.4
14.8
13.0
Range
(7.8-22.9)
(7.3-27.5)
(11.0-18.6)
PFS event
Event
73 (48.3%)
38 (51.4%)
35 (45.5%)
Non-event
78 (51.7%)
36 (48.6%)
42 (54.5%)
PFS months
Median
10.7
10.3
10.7
Range
(5.1-18.9)
(5.4-24.5)
(3.7-15.8)
Table 2 Relationship between the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcome
Parameters
Overall survival
Progression-free survival
Non-event
Event
P value
Non-event
Event
P value
Age, yr
0.758
0.628
≤ 65
57
37
50
44
> 65
36
21
28
29
Sex
0.102
0.009
Female
17
5
17
5
Male
76
53
61
68
AJCC-TNM stage
0.021
0.013
I and II
61
27
53
35
III and IV
32
31
25
38
Pathological type
0.011
0.469
Adenocarcinoma
38
36
36
38
SCC
55
22
42
35
EGFR status
0.596
Wild-type
3
2
0.941
2
3
Mutant
90
56
76
70
BRAF status
0.428
0.332
Wild-type
1
0
1
0
Mutant
92
58
77
73
KRAS status
0.734
0.962
Wild-type
1
1
1
1
Mutant
92
57
77
72
PIK3CA status
0.828
0.896
Wild-type
9
5
7
7
Mutant
84
53
71
66
Table 3 The results of the univariate Cox regression analysis
Gene name
HR
HR.95L
HR.95H
P value
PDHA1
22.96
3.09
170.73
0.002
ATP7A
3.83
0.96
15.21
0.057
CDKN2A
0.84
0.64
1.10
0.204
PDHB
1.76
0.37
8.50
0.479
GLS
1.50
0.48
4.67
0.484
ATP7B
1.15
0.77
1.71
0.496
FDX1
1.52
0.41
5.59
0.527
DLD
1.82
0.27
12.11
0.534
LIPT2
0.87
0.46
1.64
0.662
DLST
0.58
0.05
6.70
0.662
NFE2L2
0.73
0.18
3.04
0.666
DLAT
1.43
0.23
8.89
0.702
DBT
0.83
0.27
2.54
0.744
GCSH
0.87
0.32
2.36
0.777
MTF1
0.85
0.26
2.80
0.785
LIAS
0.86
0.25
2.93
0.806
NLRP3
0.91
0.44
1.90
0.809
LIPT1
1.14
0.29
4.41
0.853
SLC31A1
1.08
0.19
6.15
0.928
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of pyruvate dehydrogenase A1 expression and the clinicopathological factors in the esophagus cancer patients
Variables
Overall survival
Progression-free survival
HR (95%CI of HR)
P value
HR (95%CI of HR)
P value
PDHA1 low
1.00 (Reference)
1.00 (Reference)
UVA PDHA1 high
2.34 (1.42-3.87)
0.0009
1.51 (0.95-2.38)
0.08
MVA PDHA1 high
1.67 (1.03-2.73)
0.0386
Age ≤ 65
1.00 (Reference)
1.00 (Reference)
Age > 65
0.81 (0.47-1.41)
0.46
0.97 (0.60-1.55)
0.89
Sex, Female
1.00 (Reference)
1.00 (Reference)
UVA Male
2.12 (0.84-5.34)
0.11
2.97 (1.19-7.39)
0.02
MVA Male
2.27 (0.90- 5.73)
0.08
Pathological types, adenocarcinoma
1.00 (Reference)
1.00 (Reference)
SCC
0.81 (0.47-1.39)
0.45
1.11 (0.70-1.77)
0.66
AJCC stage I, II
1.00 (Reference)
1.00 (Reference)
UVA AJCC stage III, IV
2.53 (1.76-3.64)
5.86 × 10-7
1.98 (1.46-2.67)
9.48 × 10-6
MVA AJCC stage III, IV
2.30 (1.58-3.35)
1.46 × 10-5
1.86 (1.37-2.52)
6.98 × 10-5
Citation: Xu H, Du QC, Wang XY, Zhou L, Wang J, Ma YY, Liu MY, Yu H. Comprehensive analysis of the relationship between cuproptosis-related genes and esophageal cancer prognosis. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(33): 12089-12103