He MM, Lin XT, Lei M, Xu XL, He ZH. Does delaying ureteral stent placement lead to higher rates of preoperative acute pyelonephritis during pregnancy? World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(3): 802-810 [PMID: 35127896 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i3.802]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Zhi-Hui He, PhD, Chief Doctor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, No. 151 Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China. 945523157@qq.com
Research Domain of This Article
Urology & Nephrology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Jan 21, 2022; 10(3): 802-810 Published online Jan 21, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i3.802
Table 1 Patient characteristics associated with early and delayed time to ureteral stent placement
Demographic data/clinical parameters
Total (n = 100)
Early TTU (n = 42)
Delayed TTU (n = 58)
P value
Age (yr), mean ± SD
30 ± 4.55
31 ± 4.87
29 ± 4.19
0.06
BMI (kg/cm2), mean ± SD
23.05 ± 3.06
23.38 ±3.28
22.81 ± 2.89
0.36
Gestation (wk), mean ± SD
22 (18, 27)
22 ± 7.83
22 ± 5.02
0.99
History of stones, n (%)
26 (76)
14 (53.8)
12 (46.2)
0.16
WBC count (× 109/L), mean ± SD
13.48 ± 3.49
14.19 ± 4.12
12.97 ± 2.87
0.10
CRP (mg/dL), median (Q1, Q3)
2.64 (1.04, 4.35)
4.25 (1.9, 5.89)
1.77 (0.98, 4.0)
0.12
Stone size (mm), median (Q1, Q3)
8.25 (4.28, 14)
9.98 (4.5, 12)
9.07 (0, 15)
0.59
< 10 mm, n (%)
55 (55)
21 (38.2)
34 (61.8)
0.39
≥ 10 mm, n (%)
45 (45)
21 (46.7)
24 (53.3)
Hydronephrosis (mm), median (Q1, Q3)
26.5 (15, 62)
47 (15, 80)
34 (15, 42)
0.30
None/light, n (%)
62 (62)
21 (40.4)
31 (59.6)
0.73
Moderate/severe, n (%)
38 (38)
21 (43.8)
27 (56.3)
Stone location, n (%)
0.09
None
24 (24)
11 (45.8)
13 (54.2)
Ureter
48 (48)
24 (50)
24 (50)
Kidney
28 (28)
7 (25)
21 (75)
Urology consultation time (h), median (Q1, Q3)
27 (19, 52)
19 (13, 23)
48 (24, 90)
0.001
≤ 24 h, n (%)
53 (53)
34 (64.2)
19 (35.8)
0.00
> 24 h, n (%)
47 (47)
8 (17)
39 (83)
Preoperative fetal complications, n (%)
12 (12)
6 (50)
6 (50)
0.55
PANP, n (%)
32 (32)
15 (46.9)
17 (53.1)
0.50
UTI after surgery, n (%)
22 (22)
11 (50)
11 (50)
0.39
LOS (d), mean ± SD
7 ± 3.56
6 ± 3.03
8 ± 3.60
0.001
Total cost (Yuan in RMB), mean ± SD
12382.79 ± 5665.26
10448.95 ± 2412.28
13783.16 ± 6841.61
0.001
Newborn weight (g), mean ± SD
2893.30 ± 542.10
2891.67 ± 509.18
2894.48 ± 569.15
0.98
Cesarean section rate, n (%)
38 (38)
17 (44.7)
21 (55.3)
0.66
Preterm delivery, n (%)
8 (8)
6 (75)
2 (25)
0.07
Table 2 Associations between preoperative characteristics and preoperative acute pyelonephritis
Demographic data/clinical parameters
PANP (n = 32)
No-PANP (n = 68 )
P value
Age (yr), mean ± SD
29 ± 5.01
30 ± 4.04
0.53
BMI (kg/cm2), mean ± SD
21.66 ± 2.44
23.30 ± 2.97
0.007
Gestation (wk), median (Q1, Q3)
20 (19, 25)
23 (20, 28)
0.04
History of stones, n (%)
12 (46.2)
14 (53.8)
0.07
Pain to surgery (h), median (Q1, Q3)
114.5 (70, 140)
84.5 (61, 120)
0.00
< 96 h, n (%)
9 (17.6)
42 (82.4)
0.002
≥ 96 h, n (%)
23 (46.9)
26 (53.1)
Admission to surgery (h), median (Q1, Q3)
53 (24, 160)
50 (36, 90)
0.81
< 48 h, n (%)
15 (35.7)
27 (64.3)
0.81
≥ 48 h, n (%)
17 (29.3)
41 (70.7)
Pain to admission (h), median (Q1, Q3)
90 (50, 120)
24 (12, 48)
0.00
< 48 h, n (%)
3 (6.1)
46 (93.6)
0.00
≥ 48 h, n (%)
29 (56.9)
22 (43.1)
WBC count (× 109/L), mean ± SD
14.59 ± 4.40
12.96 ± 2.84
0.06
CRP (mg/dL), median (Q1, Q3)
3.20 (1.47, 6.32)
2.23 (0.97, 3.86)
0.01
Stone location, n (%)
0.00
None
6 (25)
18 (75)
Ureter
8 (16.7)
40 (83.3)
Kidney
18 (64.3)
10 (35.7)
Stone size (mm), median (Q1, Q3)
8.25 (4.5, 17)
8 (0, 12)
0.25
< 10 mm, n (%)
18 (32.7)
37 (67.3)
0.86
≥ 10 mm, n (%)
14 (31.1)
31 (68.9)
Hydronephrosis (mm), median (Q1, Q3)
31 (20, 60)
19.5 (14, 62)
0.05
None/light, n (%)
12 (23.1)
40 (76.9)
0.05
Moderate/severe, n (%)
20 (41.7)
28 (58.3)
Urology consultation time (h), median (Q1, Q3)
23 (13, 68)
34 (20, 53)
0.23
≤ 24 h, n (%)
16 (30.2)
37 (69.8)
0.68
> 24 h, n (%)
16 (34)
31 (66)
Total cost (Yuan in RMB), mean ± SD
16522.59 ± 8871.61
10236.07 ± 3281.16
0.001
Preoperative fetal complications, n (%)
6 (50)
6 (50)
0.27
UTI after surgery, n (%)
12 (54.5)
10 (45.5)
0.01
LOS (d), mean ± SD
11 ± 5.34
7 ± 2.98
0.001
Newborn weight (g), mean ± SD
2706.56 ± 649.47
2978.97 ± 460.58
0.02
Cesarean section rate, n (%)
14 (36.8)
24 (63.2)
0.42
Preterm delivery, n (%)
6 (75)
2 (25)
0.02
Table 3 Multivariate analysis of preoperative acute pyelonephritis
Variable
OR (95%CI)
P value
Pain to admission (h)
22.10 (5.31-91.91)
0.000
Stone location
0.003
None
1.0
Ureter
6.61 (1.48-29.53)
Kidney
9.91 (2.56-38.42)
Table 4 Comparison of outcomes in time to ureteral stent placement patients before and after surgery
Variable
Before surgery (n = 100)
After surgery (n = 100)
P value
WBC count (× 109/L), mean ± SD
13.48 ± 3.48
9.96 ± 1.95
< 0.01
CRP (mg/dL), median (Q1, Q3)
2.64 (1.04, 4.35)
1.35 (0.54, 2.36)
< 0.01
Hydronephrosis (mm), median (Q1, Q3)
26.50 (15.00, 75.00)
10.50 (0, 18)
< 0.01
Citation: He MM, Lin XT, Lei M, Xu XL, He ZH. Does delaying ureteral stent placement lead to higher rates of preoperative acute pyelonephritis during pregnancy? World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(3): 802-810