Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2022; 10(21): 7365-7375
Published online Jul 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7365
Published online Jul 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7365
Variables | Total (n = 34) | CRT (n = 17) | Radiation (n = 17) | P value |
Age (yr) | 0.275 | |||
Median (range) | 76.0 (72.0-80.0) | 77.0 (75.0-80.0) | 75.0 (72.0-80.0) | |
Age | 0.731 | |||
≤ 75 yr | 16 (47.1) | 7 (41.2) | 9 (52.9) | |
> 75 yr | 18 (52.9) | 10 (58.8) | 8 (47.1) | |
Gende | 1.000 | |||
Female | 5 (14.7) | 3 (17.6) | 2 (11.8) | |
Male | 29 (85.3) | 14 (82.4) | 15 (88.2) | |
Primary tumor location | 1.000 | |||
Cervical | 3 (8.8) | 1 (5.9) | 2 (11.8) | |
Distal third | 14 (41.2) | 7 (41.2) | 7 (41.2) | |
Middle third | 11 (32.4) | 6 (35.3) | 5 (29.4) | |
Proximal third | 6 (17.6) | 3 (17.6) | 3 (17.6) | |
cTNM stage | 0.282 | |||
II | 12 (35.3) | 4 (23.5) | 8 (47.1) | |
III | 22 (64.7) | 13 (76.5) | 9 (52.9) | |
Gastric tube insertion | 1.000 | |||
No | 23 (67.6) | 11 (64.7) | 12 (70.6) | |
Yes | 11 (32.4) | 6 (35.3) | 5 (29.4) | |
Follow-up (mo) | 0.293 | |||
Median (IQR) | 24.5 (15.2-32.5) | 26.0 (19.0-36.0) |
Total (n = 34) | CRT (n = 17) | Radiation (n = 17) | P value | |
Fatigue | 0.273 | |||
0 | 14 (41.2) | 8 (47.1) | 6 (35.3) | |
Grade 1 | 18 (52.9) | 7 (41.2) | 11 (64.7) | |
Grade 2 | 2 (5.9) | 2 (11.8) | 0 (0) | |
Granulocytopenia | 0.450 | |||
0 | 15 (44.1) | 6 (35.3) | 9 (52.9) | |
Grade 1 | 16 (47.1) | 10 (58.8) | 6 (35.3) | |
Grade 2 | 3 (8.8) | 1 (5.9) | 2 (11.8) | |
Thrombocytopenia | 1.000 | |||
0 | 29 (85.3) | 14 (82.4) | 15 (88.2) | |
Grade 1 | 5 (14.7) | 3 (17.6) | 2 (11.8) | |
Anemia | 0.342 | |||
0 | 10 (29.4) | 3 (17.6) | 7 (41.2) | |
Grade 1 | 17 (50.0) | 10 (58.8) | 7 (41.2) | |
Grade 2 | 7 (20.6) | 4 (23.5) | 3 (17.6) | |
Esophagitis | 0.865 | |||
0 | 16 (47.1) | 9 (52.9) | 7 (41.2) | |
Grade 1 | 15 (44.1) | 7 (41.2) | 8 (47.1) | |
Grade 2 | 2 (5.9) | 1 (5.9) | 1 (5.9) | |
Grade 3 | 1 (2.9) | 0 (0) | 1 (5.9) | |
Gastrointestinal reactions | 0.012 | |||
0 | 22 (64.7) | 7 (41.2) | 15 (88.2) | |
Grade 1 | 12 (35.3) | 10 (58.8) | 2 (11.8) | |
Radiation pneumonitis | 0.653 | |||
0 | 27 (79.4) | 13 (76.5) | 14 (82.4) | |
Grade 1 | 6 (17.6) | 4 (23.5) | 2 (11.8) | |
Grade 2 | 1 (2.9) | 0 (0) | 1 (5.9) | |
Dermatitis | 0.601 | |||
0 | 30 (88.2) | 16 (94.1) | 14 (82.4) | |
Grade 1 | 4 (11.8) | 1 (5.9) | 3 (17.6) | |
Short-term efficacy | 0.409 | |||
ORR | 28 (82.4) | 15 (88.2) | 13 (76.5) | |
CR | 2 (5.9) | 1 (5.9) | 1 (5.9) | |
PR | 26 (76.5) | 14 (82.4) | 12 (70.6) | |
SD | 3 (8.8) | 2 (11.8) | 1 (5.9) | |
PD | 3 (8.8) | 0 (0) | 3 (17.6) |
- Citation: Liu LH, Yan MH, Di YP, Fu ZG, Zhang XD, Li HQ. Comparison of involved-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with S-1 vs radiotherapy alone for elderly patients with esophageal cancer. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(21): 7365-7375
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i21/7365.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7365