Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2022; 10(21): 7348-7355
Published online Jul 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7348
Published online Jul 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7348
Table 1 Table showing pre and post-operative sagittal spinopelvic parameters
No. | Variable | Pre-op, median (IQR) | Post-op, median (IQR) | P value |
1 | PT | 14.4 (10.1-18.4) | 14.1 (10.6-18.6) | 0.455 |
2 | PI | 49.3 (44-54.9) | 50.9 (44.5-57.5) | 0.148 |
3 | SS | 36.4 (29.2-40.3) | 36.7 (28.5-41.1) | 0.551 |
4 | LL | -46.8 (-53.6 to -42) | -48.0 (-53.6 to -40.3) | 0.390 |
5 | SVA | 44.1 (3.0-78.5) | 46.8 (21.7-77.0) | 0.153 |
Table 2 Table showing sub-group analysis between group A and group B
No. | Variable | Group A, n = 15 | Group B, n = 17 | ||||
Pre-op, median (IQR) | Post-op, median (IQR) | P value | Pre-op, median (IQR) | Post-op, median (IQR) | P value | ||
1 | PT | 14.9 (11.1-20.8) | 14 (7.2-20.4) | 0.35 | 14.0 (9.4-18.2) | 14.4 (12.2-17) | 0.540 |
2 | PI | 45.3 (43.6-54.6) | 51.6 (44-6-61.6) | 0.124 | 48.6 (44.2-56.3) | 48.3 (42-55.7) | 0.603 |
3 | SS | 35.2 (29.5-39.5) | 37.7 (30.6-42.3) | 0.413 | 36.9 (26.7-41.8) | 35.1 (26.5-40.6) | 0.890 |
4 | LL | -46.4 (-49.7 to -43.8) | -48.5 (-55.6 to -42.5) | 0.639 | -47.8 (-56 to -40.6) | -47.5 (-52.5 to -38.5) | 0.579 |
5 | SVA | 42.9 (-36.6-78.7) | 63.7 (28.2-78.1) | 0.107 | 50.1 (17.4-79.0) | 28.2 (18.9-78.0) | 0.747 |
Table 3 Showing sub-group analysis of unilateral and bilateral total knee arthroplasty
No. | Variable | Unilateral, n = 10 | Bilateral, n = 22 | ||||
Pre-op, median (IQR) | Post-op, median (IQR) | P value | Pre-op, median (IQR) | Post-op, median (IQR) | P value | ||
1 | PT | 14 (10.1-23.4) | 13.8 (9.4-21.4) | 0.625 | 14.5 (9.8-18.3) | 14.1 (11.2-17.2) | 0.406 |
2 | PI | 51.1 (44.4-54.3) | 52 (41.6-63.0) | 0.193 | 48.5 (43.7-56.1) | 49.5 (44.5-54.9) | 0.384 |
3 | SS | 36.7 (28.6-38.5) | 37.2 (27.9-43.9) | 0.322 | 35.7 (28.9-41.7) | 36.4 (28.4-39.8) | 0.943 |
4 | LL | -44.5 (-55.4 to -38.2) | -48 (-57.8 to -36) | 0.959 | -47.5 (-54 to -43.2) | -48 (-53.6 to -40.9) | 0.867 |
5 | SVA | 47.7 (20.6-83.2) | 52.0 (26.1-83.6) | 0.375 | 42.5 (-2.9-79.1) | 33.4 (19.9-77.2) | 0.443 |
Table 4 Sub-group analysis of males and females
No. | Variable | Males, n = 9 | Females, n = 23 | ||||
Pre-op | Post-op | P value | Pre-op | Post-op | P value | ||
1 | PT | 13.7 | 13.2 | 0.571 | 15.7 | 17.1 | 0.660 |
2 | PI | 48.6 | 48.8 | 0.335 | 50.1 | 52.1 | 0.771 |
3 | SS | 34.9 | 35.5 | 0.967 | 34.4 | 34.9 | 0.934 |
4 | LL | -49.6 | -45.7 | 0.201 | -46.2 | -47.0 | 0.837 |
5 | SVA | 50.1 | 69.6 | 0.837 | 32.6 | 44.5 | 0.409 |
- Citation: Puthiyapura LK, Jain M, Tripathy SK, Puliappadamb HM. Effect of osteoarthritic knee flexion deformity correction by total knee arthroplasty on sagittal spinopelvic alignment in Indian population. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(21): 7348-7355
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i21/7348.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7348