Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2022; 10(21): 7333-7340
Published online Jul 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7333
Published online Jul 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7333
Table 1 Comparison of general information of the two groups of patients, n (%)
Factor | Breast cancer group (n = 108) | Benign group (n = 110) | t/χ2 | P value |
Age (mean ± SD, yr) | 46.1 ± 7.0 | 47.5 ± 8.4 | -1.336 | 0.183 |
Body mass index (mean ± SD, kg/m2) | 24.6 ± 2.5 | 24.3 ± 2.6 | 0.868 | 0.386 |
Affected side distribution | 0.902 | 0.342 | ||
Left side | 58 (53.7) | 52 (48.15) | ||
Right | 50 (46.3) | 58 (53.7) | ||
Hypertension | 0.618 | 0.432 | ||
Yes | 11 (10.19) | 15 (13.89) | ||
No | 97 (89.81) | 95 (87.96) | ||
Diabetes | 2.062 | 0.151 | ||
Yes | 6 (5.56) | 12 (11.11) | ||
No | 102 (94.44) | 98 (90.74) | ||
Hyperlipidemia | 2.221 | 0.136 | ||
Yes | 17 (15.74) | 10 (9.26) | ||
No | 91 (84.26) | 100 (92.59) | ||
Menopause | 0.930 | 0.335 | ||
Yes | 18 (16.67) | 24 (22.22) | ||
No | 90 (83.33) | 86 (79.63) |
Table 2 Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient values between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Groups | Ktrans (min-1) | Kep (min-1) | Ve | ADC (× 10-3 mm2/s) |
Breast cancer group (n = 108) | 0.481 ± 0.113 | 0.577 ± 0.120 | 0.764 ± 0.170 | 0.741 ± 0.184 |
Benign group (n = 110) | 0.264 ± 0.096 | 0.408 ± 0.113 | 0.528 ± 0.150 | 1.109 ± 0.241 |
t value | 15.290 | 10.707 | 10.874 | -12.655 |
P value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Table 3 Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient values in breast cancer patients with different immunostaining and histochemical results (mean ± SD)
Express the situation | n | Ktrans (min-1) | Kep (min-1) | Ve | ADC (× 10-3 mm2/s) |
ER | |||||
Positive | 74 | 0.462 ± 0.105 | 0.563 ± 0.112 | 0.740 ± 0.166 | 0.713 ± 0.170 |
Feminine | 34 | 0.522 ± 0.100 | 0.607 ± 0.109 | 0.816 ± 0.154 | 0.802 ± 0.168 |
t value | -2.698 | -1.912 | -2.259 | -2.536 | |
P value | 0.008 | 0.059 | 0.026 | 0.013 | |
PR | |||||
Positive | 62 | 0.468 ± 0.108 | 0.542 ± 0.115 | 0.751 ± 0.165 | 0.721 ± 0.180 |
Feminine | 46 | 0.499 ± 0.111 | 0.624 ± 0.116 | 0.782 ± 0.158 | 0.768 ± 0.178 |
t value | -1.458 | -3.651 | -0.983 | -1.348 | |
P value | 0.148 | 0.000 | 0.328 | 0.180 | |
HER-2 | |||||
Positive | 34 | 0.461 ± 0.107 | 0.621 ± 0.116 | 0.713 ± 0.166 | 0.719 ± 0.181 |
Feminine | 74 | 0.490 ± 0.110 | 0.557 ± 0.109 | 0.787 ± 0.162 | 0.751 ± 0.178 |
t value | -1.283 | 2.777 | -2.188 | -0.863 | |
P value | 0.202 | 0.006 | 0.031 | 0.390 |
Table 4 Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient values in breast cancer patients with different prognosis (mean ± SD)
Recurrence | n | Ktrans (min-1) | Kep (min-1) | Ve | ADC (× 10-3 mm2/s) |
Relapse | 22 | 0.457 ± 0.111 | 0.528 ± 0.109 | 0.698 ± 0.155 | 0.663 ± 0.181 |
No recurrence | 86 | 0.487 ± 0.107 | 0.590 ± 0.112 | 0.781 ± 0.165 | 0.761 ± 0.176 |
t value | -1.165 | -2.329 | -2.130 | -2.317 | |
P value | 0.247 | 0.022 | 0.035 | 0.022 |
Table 5 The value of magnetic resonance imaging parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient values in predicting patient recurrence
Index | Critical value | AUC | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Missed diagnosis rate (%) | Misdiagnosis rate (%) |
Kep (min-1) | 0.561 | 0.599 | 65.19 | 55.40 | 34.81 | 44.60 |
Ve | 0.725 | 0.527 | 58.04 | 51.06 | 41.96 | 48.94 |
ADC (×10-3 mm2/s) | 0.718 | 0.739 | 71.57 | 61.09 | 28.43 | 38.91 |
ADC + Kep + Ve | - | 0.858 | 83.67 | 77.18 | 16.33 | 22.82 |
- Citation: Wang Z, Ren GY, Yin Q, Wang Q. Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging quantitative parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient value with pathological breast cancer. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(21): 7333-7340
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i21/7333.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7333