Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2022; 10(21): 7333-7340
Published online Jul 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7333
Table 1 Comparison of general information of the two groups of patients, n (%)
Factor
Breast cancer group (n = 108)
Benign group (n = 110)
t/χ2
P value
Age (mean ± SD, yr)46.1 ± 7.047.5 ± 8.4-1.3360.183
Body mass index (mean ± SD, kg/m2)24.6 ± 2.524.3 ± 2.60.8680.386
Affected side distribution0.9020.342
Left side58 (53.7)52 (48.15)
Right50 (46.3)58 (53.7)
Hypertension0.6180.432
Yes11 (10.19)15 (13.89)
No97 (89.81)95 (87.96)
Diabetes2.0620.151
Yes6 (5.56)12 (11.11)
No102 (94.44)98 (90.74)
Hyperlipidemia2.2210.136
Yes17 (15.74)10 (9.26)
No91 (84.26)100 (92.59)
Menopause0.9300.335
Yes18 (16.67)24 (22.22)
No90 (83.33)86 (79.63)
Table 2 Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient values between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Groups
Ktrans (min-1)
Kep (min-1)
Ve
ADC (× 10-3 mm2/s)
Breast cancer group (n = 108)0.481 ± 0.1130.577 ± 0.1200.764 ± 0.1700.741 ± 0.184
Benign group (n = 110)0.264 ± 0.0960.408 ± 0.1130.528 ± 0.1501.109 ± 0.241
t value15.29010.70710.874-12.655
P value0.0000.0000.0000.000
Table 3 Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient values in breast cancer patients with different immunostaining and histochemical results (mean ± SD)
Express the situation
n
Ktrans (min-1)
Kep (min-1)
Ve
ADC (× 10-3 mm2/s)
ER
Positive740.462 ± 0.1050.563 ± 0.1120.740 ± 0.1660.713 ± 0.170
Feminine340.522 ± 0.1000.607 ± 0.1090.816 ± 0.1540.802 ± 0.168
t value-2.698-1.912-2.259-2.536
P value0.0080.0590.0260.013
PR
Positive620.468 ± 0.1080.542 ± 0.1150.751 ± 0.1650.721 ± 0.180
Feminine460.499 ± 0.1110.624 ± 0.1160.782 ± 0.1580.768 ± 0.178
t value-1.458-3.651-0.983-1.348
P value0.1480.0000.3280.180
HER-2
Positive340.461 ± 0.1070.621 ± 0.1160.713 ± 0.1660.719 ± 0.181
Feminine740.490 ± 0.1100.557 ± 0.1090.787 ± 0.1620.751 ± 0.178
t value-1.2832.777-2.188-0.863
P value0.2020.0060.0310.390
Table 4 Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient values in breast cancer patients with different prognosis (mean ± SD)
Recurrence
n
Ktrans (min-1)
Kep (min-1)
Ve
ADC (× 10-3 mm2/s)
Relapse220.457 ± 0.1110.528 ± 0.1090.698 ± 0.1550.663 ± 0.181
No recurrence860.487 ± 0.1070.590 ± 0.1120.781 ± 0.1650.761 ± 0.176
t value-1.165-2.329-2.130-2.317
P value0.2470.0220.0350.022
Table 5 The value of magnetic resonance imaging parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient values in predicting patient recurrence
Index
Critical value
AUC
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
Missed diagnosis rate (%)
Misdiagnosis rate (%)
Kep (min-1)0.5610.59965.1955.4034.8144.60
Ve0.7250.52758.0451.0641.9648.94
ADC (×10-3 mm2/s)0.7180.73971.5761.0928.4338.91
ADC + Kep + Ve-0.85883.6777.1816.3322.82