Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2022; 10(21): 7265-7274
Published online Jul 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7265
Table 1 Number of subjects recruited at each center
Center
Experimental group (n = 198)
Control group (n = 201)
Total (n = 399)
Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital09292
First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University383270
People’s Hospital of Liaoning Province40040
Cangzhou People’s Hospital314273
Second People’s Hospital of Huai’an393574
Ganyu District People’s Hospital of Lianyungang50050
Table 2 Baseline information of patients in the two groups
Male (n, %)Age (yr)Height (cm)Weight (kg)Heart rate (beats/min)Body temperature (℃)Systolic pressure (mmHg)Diastolic pressure (mmHg)
Experimental group (n = 198)109 (55.3)65.57 ± 10.47164.83± 7.2865.12 ± 9.19176.9 ± 14.3436.42 ± 0.33147.48 ± 23.2084.23 ± 14.00
Control group (n = 201)132 (65.7)64.87 ± 10.75MissingMissing 78.2 ± 15.8036.43 ± 0.34150.30 ± 24.11 84.57 ± 14.43
Statistic4.460.420.230.280.520.041.440.567
P value0.350.6740.63130.59390.6030.9650.150.57
Table 3 Changes in baseline total National Institutes of Health stroke scale scores at each follow-up visit
Experimental group (n = 198)Control group (n = 201)Rank-sum testP value
Baseline (day 0)3.40 ± 2.083.63 ± 2.720.4950.621
Visit 1 (days 7 ± 2) 1.75 ± 2.032.34 ± 2.371.5880.056
Relative to baseline -1.67 ± 2.11-1.25 ± 2.62300.727< 0.0001
Visit 2 (days 14 ± 2) 1.65 ± 1.902.45 ± 2.268.138< 0.0001
Relative to baseline-2.33 ± 2.33-1.45 ± 2.36222.404< 0.0001
Visit 3 (days 21 ± 3) 2.33 ± 1.63 5.0 ± 3.542.2070.016
Relative to baseline -2.50 ± 2.32-1.67 ± 4.1216.19< 0.0001
Table 4 Efficacy of medications in the two groups, n (%)
Experimental group (n = 198)Control group (n = 201)χ2 P value
Visit 1 (days 7 ± 2)Marked response128 (64.64)97 (48.26)11.600.003
Mild response67 (33.84)102 (50.75)
No response3 (1.51)2 (0.99)
Visit 2 (days 14 ± 2) Marked response62 (74.7)64 (45.4)835.36< 0.0001
Mild response21 (25.30)75 (53.2)
No response02 (1.41)
Visit 3 (days 21 ± 3) Marked response4 (66.7)2 (22.2)887.40< 0.0001
Mild response2 (33.3)6 (66.7)
No response0 (0)1 (11.1)
Visit 1 (days 7 ± 2)Overall response195 (98.48)199 (99.01)0.1210.728
No response3 (1.52)2 (0.99)
Visit 2 (days 14 ± 2) Overall response83 (100)139 (98.59)403.127< 0.0001
No response02 (1.41)
Visit 3 (days 21 ± 3) Overall response6 (100)8 (88.89)9.630.0019
No response01 (11.11)
Table 5 Distribution of modified Rankin scale scores in the two groups

Experimental group (n = 198)
Control group (n = 201)
Rank-sum test
P value
Baseline1.880.3903
No symptom15 (7.6)48 (23.6)
No significant disability132 (66.7)95 (47.8)
Mild disability38 (19.2)41 (20.2)
Moderate disability7 (3.5)9 (4.4)
Moderately severe disability6 (3.0)8 (3.9)
Severe disability00
Visit 1 (days 7 ± 2)11.661540.020
No symptom119 (60.1)89 (44.8)
No significant disability57 (28.8)86 (42.4)
Mild disability16 (8.1)17 (8.4)
Moderate disability6 (3.0)7 (3.4)
Moderately severe disability02 (1.0)
Severe disability00
Visit 2 (days 14 ± 2)6.0980.192
No symptom46 (55.4%)59 (41.8%)
No significant disability29 (34.9%)62 (44.0%)
Mild disability8 (9.6%)15 (10.6%)
Moderate disability04 (2.8%)
Moderately severe disability01 (0.7%)
Severe disability00
Table 6 Propensity score matching between the experimental group and control group
Factors
Before propensity score; Experimental group (n = 198)
Control group (n = 201)
P value
After propensity score; Experimental group (n = 111)
Control group (n = 111)
P value
Combined medication based on vitamins-0.3310.2880.250.3750.910.34
Combined medication based on Chinese patent medicine0.5390.310.0820.1470.170.68
Combined medication based on neurotrophic agents 0.5750.2250.011-0.1930.4670.494
Combined medication based on free-radical scavengers-1.823 0.2450-0.0170.0030.955
Concomitant medication for respiratory diseases-1.1820.440.007-0.0320.0030.953
Concomitant medication for genitourinary diseases -0.6380.5570.2520.2790.1970.657
Concomitant medication for coronary heart disease0.4140.4230.3280.5121.0850.298