Effects of the information–knowledge–attitude–practice nursing model combined with predictability intervention on patients with cerebrovascular disease

Table 1 Comparison of living ability of the two groups of patients (mean ± SD)

Group	Number of cases	Barthel index
		Before nursing	After nursing	t value	P value
Observation group	70	28.44 ± 5.01	68.94 ± 10.52	32.292	0.000
Control group	70	28.26 ± 4.68	45.63 ± 9.63	13.472	0.000
t value		0.227	13.673
P value		0.821	0.000

Table 2 Comparison of motor function between the two groups (mean ± SD)

Group	Number of cases	FMA scores
		Before nursing	After nursing	t value	P value
Observation group	70	27.33 ± 4.52	56.73 ± 7.47	30.814	0.000
Control group	70	27.29 ± 4.85	40.39 ± 6.84	12.849	0.000
t value		0.054	13.504
P value		0.957	0.000

FMA: Fugl–Meyer motor function score.

Table 3 Comparisons of compliance behavior between the two groups, n (%)

Group	Number of cases	Disease knowledge acquisition	Timely medication	Appropriate exercise	Reasonable diet
Observation group	70	66 (94.29)	70 (100.00)	64 (91.43)	67 (95.71)
Control group	70	52 (74.29)	56 (80.00)	48 (68.57)	50 (71.43)
χ2		10.570	15.556	11.429	15.035
P value		0.001	0.000	0.001	0.000

Table 4 Comparison of satisfaction between the two groups of invalids, n (%)

Group	Very satisfied	Satisfied	Average	Unsatisfied	Satisfaction rate
Observation group	45 (64.29)	18 (25.71)	5 (7.14)	2 (2.86)	68 (97.14)
Control group	24 (34.29)	23 (32.86)	10 (14.29)	13 (18.57)	57 (81.43)
χ2					9.035
P value					0.003