Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 14, 2022; 10(2): 502-510
Published online Jan 14, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i2.502
Published online Jan 14, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i2.502
Table 1 Comparison of the operation status and length of postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group | n | Operation time (min) | Surgical bleeding (mL) | Anterior external incision length (cm) | Intraoperative bone graft (g) | Postoperative drainage (mL) | Hospital stays (d) |
Study group | 49 | 118.3 ± 14.0 | 339.4 ± 38.0 | 17.5 ± 2.2 | 7.10 ± 1.87 | 139.4 ± 34.0 | 7.4 ± 1.5 |
Control group | 48 | 130.1 ± 16.3 | 344.1 ± 42.6 | 17.8 ± 2.6 | 9.23 ± 2.04 | 143.8 ± 39.6 | 7.8 ± 1.7 |
t value | -3.827 | -0.574 | -0.614 | -5.362 | -0.588 | -1.229 | |
P value | 0.000 | 0.568 | 0.541 | 0.000 | 0.558 | 0.222 |
Table 2 Comparison of postoperative fracture healing between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group | n | Fracture healing time (wk) | Full load time (wk) |
Study group | 49 | 13.5 ± 1.7 | 14.6 ± 1.2 |
Control group | 48 | 14.0 ± 2.0 | 16.2 ± 1.8 |
t value | -1.328 | -5.161 | |
P value | 0.187 | 0.000 |
Table 3 Comparison of the angles of tibial plateau varus angle and tibial plateau retroversion angle between the two groups of patients at different times after surgery (mean ± SD)
Group | n | TPA angle (°) | PA angle (°) | ||
Immediately after surgery | 18 mo after surgery | Immediately after surgery | 18 mo after surgery | ||
Study group | 49 | 86.34 ± 3.81 | 86.04 ± 2.51 | 9.54 ± 2.20 | 9.83 ± 1.72 |
Control group | 48 | 86.51 ± 3.44 | 85.78 ± 2.92 | 9.31 ± 2.14 | 9.91 ± 1.84 |
t value | -0.231 | 0.471 | 0.522 | -0.221 | |
P value | 0.818 | 0.639 | 0.603 | 0.825 |
Table 4 Comparison of knee joint function between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group | n | Subjective evaluation score (points) | Radiology evaluation (points) | ||
12 mo after operation | 18 mo after surgery | 12 mo after operation | 18 mo after surgery | ||
Study group | 49 | 18.84 ± 3.50 | 25.81 ± 2.50 | 10.41 ± 2.10 | 15.50 ± 1.32 |
Control group | 48 | 16.57 ± 3.32 | 25.21 ± 2.64 | 10.13 ± 2.32 | 15.16 ± 1.27 |
t value | 3.276 | 1.150 | 0.623 | 1.292 | |
P value | 0.001 | 0.253 | 0.534 | 0.199 |
Table 5 Comparison of surgical complication rates between the two groups, n (%)
Group | n | Incision infection | Delayed fracture union | Traumatic arthritis | Complication rate |
Study group | 49 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 (3.77) |
Control group | 48 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 (15.09) |
χ2 | 4.153 | ||||
P value | 0.042 |
- Citation: Li HF, Yu T, Zhu XF, Wang H, Zhang YQ. Locking compression plate + T-type steel plate for postoperative weight bearing and functional recovery in complex tibial plateau fractures. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(2): 502-510
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i2/502.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i2.502