Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 14, 2022; 10(2): 492-501
Published online Jan 14, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i2.492
Table 1 Ultrasonographic findings of cervical lymph node metastases in positive and negative patients, n (%)
Pathological results
n
Cortical centripetal thickening
Hypoechogenicity of cortex and medulla
Long diameter/short diameter < 2
Partial liquefaction or fusion of the lymph nodes
Rich internal blood supply
Hilum deletion
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Positive cervical lymph node metastasis124 69 (55.65)55 (44.35)55 (44.35)69 (55.65)67 (54.03)57 (45.97)39 (31.45)85 (68.55)63 (50.81)61 (49.19)32 (25.81)92 (74.19)
Negative cervical lymph node metastasis85 34 (40.00)51 (60.00)26 (30.59)59 (69.41)30 (35.29)55 (64.71)14 (16.47)71 (83.53)31(36.47)54 (63.53)11 (12.94)74 (87.06)
χ2 value4.939 4.027 7.120 5.980 4.188 5.108
P value0.026 0.045 0.008 0.014 0.041 0.024
Table 2 Comparison of fine-needle aspiration thyroglobulin values between positive and negative patients with cervical lymph node metastasis (mean ± SD)
Pathological results
n
FNA-Tg (ng/mL)
t value
P value
Positive cervical lymph node metastasis124 1.56 ± 0.4714.526 0.000
Negative cervical lymph node metastasis85 0.77 ± 0.21
Table 3 The comparison of pathological diagnosis results between single and combined diagnosis of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle aspiration thyroglobulin
FNA
Pathological results
Total
FNA-Tg
Pathological results
Total
FNA + FNA-Tg
Pathological results
Total
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
Positive1068114Positive10311114Positive1207127
Negative187795Negative217495Negative47882
Total12485209Total12485209Total12485209
Table 4 Value of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle aspiration thyroglobulin alone and in combination in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with thyroid carcinoma (%)
Diagnostic method
Sensitivity
Specificity
Rate of missed diagnosis
Misdiagnosis rate
Positive predictive value
Negative predictive value
FNA85.4890.5914.529.4192.9881.05
FNA-Tg83.0687.0616.9412.9490.3577.89
FNA + FNA-Tg96.7791.763.238.2494.4995.12
Table 5 Univariate analysis of influence of fine-needle aspiration thyroglobulin on the single diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with thyroid carcinoma
Index
Correct diagnosis (n = 177)
Error diagnosis (n = 32)
t/χ2 value
P value
Age (yr)49.3 ± 5.848.2±6.60.966 0.335
Gender, n (%)0.140 0.708
Male67 (37.85)11 (34.38)
Female110 (62.15)21 (65.63)
Short diameter of lymph node (cm)0.62 ± 0.110.60 ± 0.080.982 0.327
Long diameter of lymph node (cm)1.38 ± 0.201.29 ± 0.232.288 0.023
Long diameter/short diameter, n (%)6.965 0.008
< 288 (49.72)24 (75.00)
≥ 289 (50.28)8 (25.00)
Number of collected cells, n (%)15.034 0.000
Insufficient11 (6.21)9 (28.13)
Sufficient166 (93.79)23 (71.88)
Serum TSH (ng/mL)2.09 ± 0.392.31 ± 0.46-2.854 0.005
Serum TgAb (IU/mL)20.83 ± 5.1722.15 ± 5.83-1.303 0.194
Serum Tg (ng/mL)18.94 ± 4.2016.84 ± 4.002.621 0.009
Number of cervical lymph node metastases3.41 ± 0.843.15 ± 0.761.634 0.104
Characteristics of ultrasonic signs, n (%)4.885 0.027
Signs of metastasis142 (80.23)20 (62.50)
No signs of metastasis35 (19.77)12 (37.50)
Table 6 Logistic model of the influencing factors in fine-needle aspiration thyroglobulin diagnosis of lymph node metastasis
Factors

SE
Walds
P value
OR
95%CI
Long diameter of lymph node 0.611 0.4122.1990.1381.8420.8224.131
Long diameter/short diameter0.741 0.3384.8060.0412.0981.0824.069
Number of collected cells-0.612 0.2964.2750.0470.5420.3040.969
Serum TSH0.285 0.2171.7250.2161.3300.8692.035
Serum Tg-0.442 0.1865.6470.0251.5561.0812.240
Characteristics of ultrasonic signs0.804 0.3585.0440.0372.2341.1084.507
Constant term1.309 0.6843.6620.0913.7020.96914.149