Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 26, 2022; 10(18): 6001-6008
Published online Jun 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i18.6001
Published online Jun 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i18.6001
Table 1 Comparison of basic information
Groups | Male/female | Age (yr) | Causes of injury (Falling injury/traffic accidents/falling from heights) | Preoperative ASIA grade(B/C/D) | Frankel classification (A/B/C/D) | Preoperative AO classification (A3/B3/C2) | BMI (kg/m2) |
Group 1 | 35/25 | 45.37 ± 4.24 | 13/32/15 | 13/22/25 | 13/18/15/14 | 13/35/12 | 23.75 ± 1.69 |
Group 2 | 29/31 | 45.26 ± 4.09 | 16/29/15 | 12/20/28 | 15/20/12/13 | 15/30/15 | 23.84 ± 1.76 |
χ2/t value | 1.205 | 0.145 | 0.4579 | 0.305 | 0.619 | 0.861 | 0.286 |
P value | 0.272 | 0.885 | 0.7954 | 0.859 | 0.892 | 0.650 | 0.776 |
Table 2 Comparison of the surgical indicators (mean ± SD)
Groups | Blood loss (mL) | Incision length (cm) | Operating time (min) | Intraoperative X-rays | Length of hospital stay (d) |
Group 1 (n = 60) | 748.28 ± 74.69 | 6.97 ± 0.62 | 145.79 ± 14.63 | 18.77 ± 1.63 | 12.89 ± 1.67 |
Group 2 (n = 60) | 625.71 ± 62.43 | 7.14 ± 0.75 | 125.28 ± 12.07 | 19.05 ± 1.52 | 12.48 ± 1.43 |
t value | 9.753 | 1.353 | 8.376 | 0.973 | 1.444 |
P value | 0.001 | 0.179 | 0.001 | 0.332 | 0.151 |
Table 3 Comparison of the function of the affected vertebrae (mean ± SD)
Group | Anterior vertebral height ratio of the affected vertebra (%) | Posterior vertebral height ratio of the affected vertebra (%) | Cobb angle (°) | Canal-occupying ratio of the affected vertebra (%) | ||||
Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | |
Group 1 (n = 60) | 61.86 ± 6.20 | 91.97 ± 7.12 | 89.74 ± 8.51 | 97.52 ± 1.66 | 27.54 ± 2.71 | 5.11 ± 0.53 | 66.12 ± 6.17 | 13.09 ± 1.23 |
Group 2 (n = 60) | 61.57 ± 6.25 | 89.20 ± 6.16 | 89.43 ± 8.62 | 95.40 ± 2.35 | 27.68 ± 2.62 | 7.09 ± 0.75 | 66.63 ± 6.41 | 12.87 ± 1.45 |
t value | 0.255 | 2.279 | 0.198 | 5.708 | 0.288 | 16.700 | 0.444 | 0.896 |
P value | 0.799 | 0.024 | 0.843 | 0.001 | 0.774 | 0.001 | 0.658 | 0.372 |
Table 4 Comparison of the quality of life scores between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group | Activities of daily living | Spirit | Sleep | Appetite | ||||
Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | |
Group 1 (n = 60) | 35.78 ± 5.61 | 51.13 ± 2.04 | 32.91 ± 6.23 | 48.72 ± 5.45 | 36.47 ± 4.52 | 50.87 ± 1.69 | 33.96 ± 5.12 | 52.41 ± 1.37 |
Group 2 (n = 60) | 36.02 ± 5.77 | 44.81 ± 3.62 | 33.80 ± 6.14 | 42.36 ± 5.22 | 36.68 ± 4.31 | 45.12 ± 2.78 | 34.03 ± 5.08 | 46.89 ± 2.65 |
t value | 0.200 | 10.203 | 0.683 | 5.653 | 0.226 | 11.856 | 0.065 | 12.413 |
P value | 0.842 | 0.001 | 0.497 | 0.001 | 0.822 | 0.001 | 0.948 | 0.001 |
- Citation: Zhang B, Wang JC, Jiang YZ, Song QP, An Y. Effectiveness and postoperative rehabilitation of one-stage combined anterior-posterior surgery for severe thoracolumbar fractures with spinal cord injury. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(18): 6001-6008
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i18/6001.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i18.6001