Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 26, 2022; 10(12): 3698-3708
Published online Apr 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i12.3698
Published online Apr 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i12.3698
Table 1 The association between the expressions of karyopherin A2 and clinicopathology of patients with triple-negative breast cancer, n (%)
Clinical data | Cases | KPNA2 positive expression rate | χ2 | P value |
Age (yr) | 2.868 | 0.090 | ||
< 50 | 55 | 33 (60.00) | ||
≥ 50 | 63 | 47 (74.60) | ||
BMI (kg/m2) | 0.271 | 0.602 | ||
< 22 | 60 | 42 (70.00) | ||
≥ 22 | 58 | 38 (65.52) | ||
Karnofsky score (points) | 0.088 | 0.767 | ||
< 70 | 52 | 36 (69.23) | ||
≥ 70 | 66 | 44 (66.67) | ||
Differentiation degree | 0.393 | 0.531 | ||
High differentiation | 51 | 33 (64.71) | ||
Medium low differentiation | 67 | 47 (70.15) | ||
Intravascular tumor thrombus | 8.511 | 0.004 | ||
Yes | 25 | 23 (92.00) | ||
No | 93 | 57 (61.29) | ||
Tumor size | 0.136 | 0.712 | ||
> 5 cm | 53 | 35 (66.04) | ||
≤ 5 cm | 65 | 45 (69.23) | ||
TNM stages | 7.863 | 0.005 | ||
III | 94 | 58 (61.70) | ||
IV | 24 | 22 (91.67) | ||
Pathological type | 0.301 | 0.583 | ||
Invasive ductal carcinoma | 96 | 64 (66.67) | ||
Other | 22 | 16 (72.73) | ||
Ki-67 | 2.764 | 0.096 | ||
≤ 14% | 37 | 29 (78.38) | ||
> 14% | 81 | 51 (62.96) | ||
P53 | 0.034 | 0.854 | ||
Positive | 79 | 54 (68.35) | ||
Negative | 39 | 26 (66.67) |
Table 2 The association between the expression of SRY-related HMG box-2 and clinicopathology of patients with triple-negative breast cancer, n (%)
Clinical data | Cases | SOX2 positive expression rate | χ2 | P value |
Age (yr) | 0.000 | 0.994 | ||
< 50 | 55 | 41 (74.55) | ||
≥ 50 | 63 | 47 (74.60) | ||
BMI (kg/m2) | 0.545 | 0.460 | ||
< 22 | 60 | 43 (71.67) | ||
≥ 22 | 58 | 45 (77.59) | ||
Karnofsky score (points) | 0.574 | 0.449 | ||
< 70 | 52 | 37 (71.15) | ||
≥ 70 | 66 | 51 (77.27) | ||
Differentiation degree | 0.000 | 0.988 | ||
High differentiation | 51 | 38 (74.51) | ||
Medium low differentiation | 67 | 50 (74.63) | ||
Intravascular tumor thrombus | 7.689 | 0.006 | ||
Yes | 25 | 24 (96.00) | ||
No | 93 | 64 (68.82) | ||
Tumor size | 0.420 | 0.517 | ||
> 5 cm | 53 | 38 (71.70) | ||
≤ 5 cm | 65 | 50 (76.92) | ||
TNM stages | 7.180 | 0.007 | ||
III | 94 | 65 (69.15) | ||
IV | 24 | 23 (95.83) | ||
Pathological type | 0.049 | 0.825 | ||
Invasive ductal carcinoma | 96 | 72 (75.00) | ||
Other | 22 | 16 (72.73) | ||
Ki-67 | 0.073 | 0.787 | ||
≤ 14% | 37 | 27 (72.97) | ||
> 14% | 81 | 61 (75.31) | ||
P53 | 0.741 | 0.389 | ||
Positive | 79 | 57 (72.15) | ||
Negative | 39 | 31 (79.49) |
Table 3 Correlation analysis
KPNA2 expression | SOX2 expression | rs | P value | |
Positive | Negative | |||
Positive | 72 | 8 | 0.514 | 0.000 |
Negative | 16 | 22 |
Table 4 The comparison of clinical data between the observation and control groups, n (%)
Clinical data | Observation group (n = 60) | Control group (n = 58) | t/χ2 | P value |
Age (yr) | 54.49 ± 4.29 | 55.70 ± 5.10 | -1.396 | 0.165 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 22.02 ± 2.05 | 22.10 ± 2.54 | -0.189 | 0.851 |
Karnofsky score (points) | 74.40 ± 5.12 | 75.52 ± 6.02 | -1.090 | 0.278 |
Differentiation degree | 1.188 | 0.276 | ||
High differentiation | 23 (38.33) | 28 (48.28) | ||
Medium low differentiation | 37 (61.67) | 30 (51.72) | ||
Intravascular tumor thrombus | 0.337 | 0.562 | ||
Yes | 14 (23.33) | 11 (18.97) | ||
No | 46 (78.33) | 47 (81.03) | ||
Tumor size | 0.576 | 0.448 | ||
> 5 cm | 29 (48.33) | 24 (41.38) | ||
≤ 5 cm | 31 (51.67) | 34 (58.62) | ||
TNM stages | 0.009 | 0.926 | ||
III | 48 (80.00) | 46 (79.31) | ||
IV | 12 (20.00) | 12 (20.69) | ||
Pathological type | 0.735 | 0.391 | ||
Invasive ductal carcinoma | 47 (78.33) | 49 (84.48) | ||
Other | 13 (21.67) | 9 (15.52) | ||
KPNA2 expression | 0.016 | 0.899 | ||
Positive | 41 (68.33) | 39 (67.24) | ||
Negative | 19 (31.67) | 19 (32.76) | ||
SOX2 expression | 0.012 | 0.914 | ||
Positive | 45 (75.00) | 43 (74.14) | ||
Negative | 15 (25.00) | 15 (25.86) | ||
Ki-67 | 0.518 | 0.472 | ||
≤ 14% | 17 (28.33) | 20 (34.48) | ||
> 14% | 43 (71.67) | 38 (65.52) | ||
P53 | 0.210 | 0.647 | ||
Positive | 39 (65.00) | 40 (68.97) | ||
Negative | 21 (35.00) | 18 (31.03) |
Table 5 Comparison of short-term therapeutic effects between the two groups, n (%)
Group | Cases | CR | PR | SD | PD | Z | P value |
Observation group | 60 | 0 (0.00) | 35 (58.33) | 19 (31.67) | 6 (10.00) | -2.183 | 0.029 |
Control group | 58 | 0 (0.00) | 23 (39.66) | 23 (39.66) | 12 (20.69) |
Table 6 Comparison of tumor markers before and after chemotherapy between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group | Cases | CEA (mg/L) | CA19-9 (kU/L) | CA125 (kU/L) | |||
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||
Observation group | 60 | 38.49 ± 6.12 | 11.40 ± 2.32a | 50.30 ± 12.21 | 19.92 ± 3.42a | 163.30 ± 34.43 | 54.30 ± 12.28a |
control group | 58 | 40.02 ± 7.05 | 20.24 ± 2.50a | 52.29 ± 11.73 | 28.38 ± 2.95a | 168.29 ± 37.71 | 79.10 ± 14.42a |
t | -1.260 | -19.919 | -0.902 | -14.368 | -0.751 | -10.070 | |
P value | 0.210 | 0.000 | 0.369 | 0.000 | 0.454 | 0.000 |
Table 7 Multivariate analysis of the prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer
Factors | SE | Walds | P value | RR (95%CI) | |
TNM staging | 0.454 | 0.102 | 19.811 | 0.000 | 1.575 (1.289-1.923) |
Degree of differentiation | 0.322 | 0.104 | 9.586 | 0.000 | 1.380 (1.125-1.692) |
Lymph node metastasis | 0.312 | 0.112 | 7.760 | 0.000 | 1.366 (1.097-1.702) |
KPNA2 | 0.360 | 0.121 | 8.852 | 0.000 | 1.433 (1.131-1.817) |
SOX2 | 0.344 | 0.132 | 6.792 | 0.000 | 1.411 (1.089-1.827) |
Chemotherapy regimens | -0.543 | 0.142 | 14.623 | 0.000 | 0.581 (0.440-0.767) |
- Citation: Ding F, Chen RY, Hou J, Guo J, Dong TY. Efficacy and prognostic factors of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(12): 3698-3708
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i12/3698.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i12.3698